Cargando…

In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons

Errors throughout gene expression are likely deleterious, hence genomes are under selection to ameliorate their consequences. Additional stop codons (ASCs) are in-frame nonsense ‘codons’ downstream of the primary stop which may be read by translational machinery should the primary stop have been acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Alexander T., Hurst, Laurence D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31527909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008386
_version_ 1783454431143002112
author Ho, Alexander T.
Hurst, Laurence D.
author_facet Ho, Alexander T.
Hurst, Laurence D.
author_sort Ho, Alexander T.
collection PubMed
description Errors throughout gene expression are likely deleterious, hence genomes are under selection to ameliorate their consequences. Additional stop codons (ASCs) are in-frame nonsense ‘codons’ downstream of the primary stop which may be read by translational machinery should the primary stop have been accidentally read through. Prior evidence in several eukaryotes suggests that ASCs are selected to prevent potentially-deleterious consequences of read-through. We extend this evidence showing that enrichment of ASCs is common but not universal for single cell eukaryotes. By contrast, there is limited evidence as to whether the same is true in other taxa. Here, we provide the first systematic test of the hypothesis that ASCs act as a fail-safe mechanism in eubacteria, a group with high read-through rates. Contra to the predictions of the hypothesis we find: there is paucity, not enrichment, of ASCs downstream; substitutions that degrade stops are more frequent in-frame than out-of-frame in 3’ sequence; highly expressed genes are no more likely to have ASCs than lowly expressed genes; usage of the leakiest primary stop (TGA) in highly expressed genes does not predict ASC enrichment even compared to usage of non-leaky stops (TAA) in lowly expressed genes, beyond downstream codon +1. Any effect at the codon immediately proximal to the primary stop can be accounted for by a preference for a T/U residue immediately following the stop, although if anything, TT- and TC- starting codons are preferred. We conclude that there is no compelling evidence for ASC selection in eubacteria. This presents an unusual case in which the same error could be solved by the same mechanism in eukaryotes and prokaryotes but is not. We discuss two possible explanations: that, owing to the absence of nonsense mediated decay, bacteria may solve read-through via gene truncation and in eukaryotes certain prion states cause raised read-through rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6764699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67646992019-10-11 In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons Ho, Alexander T. Hurst, Laurence D. PLoS Genet Research Article Errors throughout gene expression are likely deleterious, hence genomes are under selection to ameliorate their consequences. Additional stop codons (ASCs) are in-frame nonsense ‘codons’ downstream of the primary stop which may be read by translational machinery should the primary stop have been accidentally read through. Prior evidence in several eukaryotes suggests that ASCs are selected to prevent potentially-deleterious consequences of read-through. We extend this evidence showing that enrichment of ASCs is common but not universal for single cell eukaryotes. By contrast, there is limited evidence as to whether the same is true in other taxa. Here, we provide the first systematic test of the hypothesis that ASCs act as a fail-safe mechanism in eubacteria, a group with high read-through rates. Contra to the predictions of the hypothesis we find: there is paucity, not enrichment, of ASCs downstream; substitutions that degrade stops are more frequent in-frame than out-of-frame in 3’ sequence; highly expressed genes are no more likely to have ASCs than lowly expressed genes; usage of the leakiest primary stop (TGA) in highly expressed genes does not predict ASC enrichment even compared to usage of non-leaky stops (TAA) in lowly expressed genes, beyond downstream codon +1. Any effect at the codon immediately proximal to the primary stop can be accounted for by a preference for a T/U residue immediately following the stop, although if anything, TT- and TC- starting codons are preferred. We conclude that there is no compelling evidence for ASC selection in eubacteria. This presents an unusual case in which the same error could be solved by the same mechanism in eukaryotes and prokaryotes but is not. We discuss two possible explanations: that, owing to the absence of nonsense mediated decay, bacteria may solve read-through via gene truncation and in eukaryotes certain prion states cause raised read-through rates. Public Library of Science 2019-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6764699/ /pubmed/31527909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008386 Text en © 2019 Ho, Hurst http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ho, Alexander T.
Hurst, Laurence D.
In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons
title In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons
title_full In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons
title_fullStr In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons
title_full_unstemmed In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons
title_short In eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons
title_sort in eubacteria, unlike eukaryotes, there is no evidence for selection favouring fail-safe 3’ additional stop codons
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6764699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31527909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008386
work_keys_str_mv AT hoalexandert ineubacteriaunlikeeukaryotesthereisnoevidenceforselectionfavouringfailsafe3additionalstopcodons
AT hurstlaurenced ineubacteriaunlikeeukaryotesthereisnoevidenceforselectionfavouringfailsafe3additionalstopcodons