Cargando…

Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in restorative dentistry adhesive restorations may cause postoperative sensitivity which leads to restoration failure. AIM: This study aimed to compare and evaluate the incremental and bulk fill resin Composite postoperative sensitivity in class II posterior resto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afifi, Sarah Mahmoud Hussien, Haridy, Mohamed Fouad, Farid, Mohamed Riad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6765082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592052
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.656
_version_ 1783454496969457664
author Afifi, Sarah Mahmoud Hussien
Haridy, Mohamed Fouad
Farid, Mohamed Riad
author_facet Afifi, Sarah Mahmoud Hussien
Haridy, Mohamed Fouad
Farid, Mohamed Riad
author_sort Afifi, Sarah Mahmoud Hussien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in restorative dentistry adhesive restorations may cause postoperative sensitivity which leads to restoration failure. AIM: This study aimed to compare and evaluate the incremental and bulk fill resin Composite postoperative sensitivity in class II posterior restorations bonded with two adhesive systems (self-etch and etch-and-rinse). METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly selected, their age range from twenty-five to forty years old, divided into two groups according to the packing technique of resin composite material; incremental Tetric Evoceram and Tetric Evoceram bulk-fill resin composite. Thirty patients (n = 30) for incremental Tetric Evoceram resin composite restorations and according to the adhesive systems used they were equally divided (n = 15 teeth).Thirty patients (n = 30) for Tetric Evoceram bulk-fill resin composite restorations and according to the adhesive systems used (etch and rinse or self-etch), they were equally divided (n = 15 teeth). Post-operative pain assessed at 24 hours, 1 week and 1 month using the Visual Analog Scale Score (VAS). Each patient was instructed to put a mark on the VAS line at home to point out the intensity of pain at each assessment period. The problem of measuring the pain that pain tolerance of individuals may be different from the others. This may be due to different reasons, and it is not always because of a problem in the restoration RESULTS: After 1 day, 1 week as well as 1 month, no statistically significant disagreement between the two resin composite types using self-etch adhesive strategy and total-etch adhesive strategy. Also, when the two adhesive systems were compared using Bulk Fill resin composite and incremental Nano resin composite no statistically significant disagreement between the two adhesive systems after 1 day, 1 week as well as 1 month. CONCLUSION: The post-operative hypersensitivity is related to many factors as the procedure of cavity preparation, adhesive approach, and type of resin composite used and placement technique of the resin composite.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6765082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67650822019-10-07 Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study Afifi, Sarah Mahmoud Hussien Haridy, Mohamed Fouad Farid, Mohamed Riad Open Access Maced J Med Sci Dental Science BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in restorative dentistry adhesive restorations may cause postoperative sensitivity which leads to restoration failure. AIM: This study aimed to compare and evaluate the incremental and bulk fill resin Composite postoperative sensitivity in class II posterior restorations bonded with two adhesive systems (self-etch and etch-and-rinse). METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly selected, their age range from twenty-five to forty years old, divided into two groups according to the packing technique of resin composite material; incremental Tetric Evoceram and Tetric Evoceram bulk-fill resin composite. Thirty patients (n = 30) for incremental Tetric Evoceram resin composite restorations and according to the adhesive systems used they were equally divided (n = 15 teeth).Thirty patients (n = 30) for Tetric Evoceram bulk-fill resin composite restorations and according to the adhesive systems used (etch and rinse or self-etch), they were equally divided (n = 15 teeth). Post-operative pain assessed at 24 hours, 1 week and 1 month using the Visual Analog Scale Score (VAS). Each patient was instructed to put a mark on the VAS line at home to point out the intensity of pain at each assessment period. The problem of measuring the pain that pain tolerance of individuals may be different from the others. This may be due to different reasons, and it is not always because of a problem in the restoration RESULTS: After 1 day, 1 week as well as 1 month, no statistically significant disagreement between the two resin composite types using self-etch adhesive strategy and total-etch adhesive strategy. Also, when the two adhesive systems were compared using Bulk Fill resin composite and incremental Nano resin composite no statistically significant disagreement between the two adhesive systems after 1 day, 1 week as well as 1 month. CONCLUSION: The post-operative hypersensitivity is related to many factors as the procedure of cavity preparation, adhesive approach, and type of resin composite used and placement technique of the resin composite. Republic of Macedonia 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6765082/ /pubmed/31592052 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.656 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Sarah Mahmoud Hussien Afifi, Mohamed Fouad Haridy, Mohamed Riad Farid. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Dental Science
Afifi, Sarah Mahmoud Hussien
Haridy, Mohamed Fouad
Farid, Mohamed Riad
Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
title Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
title_full Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
title_short Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
title_sort evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of bulk fill resin composite versus nano resin composite: a randomized controlled clinical study
topic Dental Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6765082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31592052
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.656
work_keys_str_mv AT afifisarahmahmoudhussien evaluationofpostoperativesensitivityofbulkfillresincompositeversusnanoresincompositearandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudy
AT haridymohamedfouad evaluationofpostoperativesensitivityofbulkfillresincompositeversusnanoresincompositearandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudy
AT faridmohamedriad evaluationofpostoperativesensitivityofbulkfillresincompositeversusnanoresincompositearandomizedcontrolledclinicalstudy