Cargando…

Unbiased atomistic insight in the competing nucleation mechanisms of methane hydrates

Methane hydrates have important industrial and climate implications, yet their formation via homogeneous nucleation under natural, moderate conditions is poorly understood. Obtaining such understanding could lead to improved control of crystallization, as well as insight into polymorph selection in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arjun, Berendsen, Thom A., Bolhuis, Peter G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6765301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906502116
_version_ 1783454534276743168
author Arjun,
Berendsen, Thom A.
Bolhuis, Peter G.
author_facet Arjun,
Berendsen, Thom A.
Bolhuis, Peter G.
author_sort Arjun,
collection PubMed
description Methane hydrates have important industrial and climate implications, yet their formation via homogeneous nucleation under natural, moderate conditions is poorly understood. Obtaining such understanding could lead to improved control of crystallization, as well as insight into polymorph selection in general, but is hampered by limited experimental resolution. Direct molecular dynamics simulations using atomistic force fields could provide such insight, but are not feasible for moderate undercooling, due to the rare event nature of nucleation. Instead, we harvest ensembles of the rare unbiased nucleation trajectories by employing transition path sampling. We find that with decreasing undercooling the mechanism shifts from amorphous to crystalline polymorph formation. At intermediate temperature the 2 mechanisms compete. Reaction coordinate analysis reveals the amount of a specific methane cage type is crucial for crystallization, while irrelevant for amorphous solids. Polymorph selection is thus governed by kinetic accessibility of the correct cage type and, moreover, occurs at precritical nucleus sizes, apparently against Ostwald’s step rule. We argue that these results are still in line with classical nucleation theory. Our findings illuminate how selection between competing methane hydrate polymorphs occurs and might generalize to other hydrates and molecular crystal formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6765301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67653012019-10-02 Unbiased atomistic insight in the competing nucleation mechanisms of methane hydrates Arjun, Berendsen, Thom A. Bolhuis, Peter G. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Physical Sciences Methane hydrates have important industrial and climate implications, yet their formation via homogeneous nucleation under natural, moderate conditions is poorly understood. Obtaining such understanding could lead to improved control of crystallization, as well as insight into polymorph selection in general, but is hampered by limited experimental resolution. Direct molecular dynamics simulations using atomistic force fields could provide such insight, but are not feasible for moderate undercooling, due to the rare event nature of nucleation. Instead, we harvest ensembles of the rare unbiased nucleation trajectories by employing transition path sampling. We find that with decreasing undercooling the mechanism shifts from amorphous to crystalline polymorph formation. At intermediate temperature the 2 mechanisms compete. Reaction coordinate analysis reveals the amount of a specific methane cage type is crucial for crystallization, while irrelevant for amorphous solids. Polymorph selection is thus governed by kinetic accessibility of the correct cage type and, moreover, occurs at precritical nucleus sizes, apparently against Ostwald’s step rule. We argue that these results are still in line with classical nucleation theory. Our findings illuminate how selection between competing methane hydrate polymorphs occurs and might generalize to other hydrates and molecular crystal formation. National Academy of Sciences 2019-09-24 2019-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6765301/ /pubmed/31501333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906502116 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Physical Sciences
Arjun,
Berendsen, Thom A.
Bolhuis, Peter G.
Unbiased atomistic insight in the competing nucleation mechanisms of methane hydrates
title Unbiased atomistic insight in the competing nucleation mechanisms of methane hydrates
title_full Unbiased atomistic insight in the competing nucleation mechanisms of methane hydrates
title_fullStr Unbiased atomistic insight in the competing nucleation mechanisms of methane hydrates
title_full_unstemmed Unbiased atomistic insight in the competing nucleation mechanisms of methane hydrates
title_short Unbiased atomistic insight in the competing nucleation mechanisms of methane hydrates
title_sort unbiased atomistic insight in the competing nucleation mechanisms of methane hydrates
topic Physical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6765301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31501333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906502116
work_keys_str_mv AT arjun unbiasedatomisticinsightinthecompetingnucleationmechanismsofmethanehydrates
AT berendsenthoma unbiasedatomisticinsightinthecompetingnucleationmechanismsofmethanehydrates
AT bolhuispeterg unbiasedatomisticinsightinthecompetingnucleationmechanismsofmethanehydrates