Cargando…

Association of RAGE rs1800625 Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Case-Control Studies

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that the rs1800625 polymorphism in RAGE promoter region might be associated with cancer risk; however, data from different studies show conflicting results. Here, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations between RAGE rs1800625 polymorphism...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yuzhong, Lu, Zhenhua, Shen, Na, Wang, Xiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6765339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534114
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.916260
_version_ 1783454540303958016
author Xu, Yuzhong
Lu, Zhenhua
Shen, Na
Wang, Xiong
author_facet Xu, Yuzhong
Lu, Zhenhua
Shen, Na
Wang, Xiong
author_sort Xu, Yuzhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that the rs1800625 polymorphism in RAGE promoter region might be associated with cancer risk; however, data from different studies show conflicting results. Here, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations between RAGE rs1800625 polymorphism and cancer risk. MATERIAL/METHODS: We searched Embase (Excerpt Medica Database), PubMed, and CNKI (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure) databases until March 15, 2019 to identify potential studies for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen eligible studies were included in the current meta-analysis, representing 6246 cases and 6819 controls. Pooled analysis showed positive correlation between the RAGE rs1800625 polymorphism and susceptibility of cancer in recessive genetic model [CC versus TC+TT: odds ratio (OR)=1.397, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.031–1.894, P=0.031]. Subgroup analysis revealed this association in the Asian, but not Caucasian population, and this correlation was not detected in either breast or lung cancer. Sensitivity analysis indicated unstable results, which should be interpreted with caution. No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the RAGE rs1800625 polymorphism was associated with increased overall cancer risk in Asians in recessive genetic model. However, large-scale and well-designed studies in different populations and diverse cancer types are needed for a precise conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6765339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67653392019-10-02 Association of RAGE rs1800625 Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Case-Control Studies Xu, Yuzhong Lu, Zhenhua Shen, Na Wang, Xiong Med Sci Monit Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that the rs1800625 polymorphism in RAGE promoter region might be associated with cancer risk; however, data from different studies show conflicting results. Here, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations between RAGE rs1800625 polymorphism and cancer risk. MATERIAL/METHODS: We searched Embase (Excerpt Medica Database), PubMed, and CNKI (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure) databases until March 15, 2019 to identify potential studies for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen eligible studies were included in the current meta-analysis, representing 6246 cases and 6819 controls. Pooled analysis showed positive correlation between the RAGE rs1800625 polymorphism and susceptibility of cancer in recessive genetic model [CC versus TC+TT: odds ratio (OR)=1.397, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.031–1.894, P=0.031]. Subgroup analysis revealed this association in the Asian, but not Caucasian population, and this correlation was not detected in either breast or lung cancer. Sensitivity analysis indicated unstable results, which should be interpreted with caution. No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the RAGE rs1800625 polymorphism was associated with increased overall cancer risk in Asians in recessive genetic model. However, large-scale and well-designed studies in different populations and diverse cancer types are needed for a precise conclusion. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2019-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6765339/ /pubmed/31534114 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.916260 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2019 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Xu, Yuzhong
Lu, Zhenhua
Shen, Na
Wang, Xiong
Association of RAGE rs1800625 Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Case-Control Studies
title Association of RAGE rs1800625 Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Case-Control Studies
title_full Association of RAGE rs1800625 Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Case-Control Studies
title_fullStr Association of RAGE rs1800625 Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Case-Control Studies
title_full_unstemmed Association of RAGE rs1800625 Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Case-Control Studies
title_short Association of RAGE rs1800625 Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Case-Control Studies
title_sort association of rage rs1800625 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 18 case-control studies
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6765339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31534114
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.916260
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyuzhong associationofragers1800625polymorphismandcancerriskametaanalysisof18casecontrolstudies
AT luzhenhua associationofragers1800625polymorphismandcancerriskametaanalysisof18casecontrolstudies
AT shenna associationofragers1800625polymorphismandcancerriskametaanalysisof18casecontrolstudies
AT wangxiong associationofragers1800625polymorphismandcancerriskametaanalysisof18casecontrolstudies