Cargando…

Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols

This study aimed to investigate the influence of immersion duration and the type of immersion solution on the outcome of push-out bond strength (POBS) tests. Root canals of 120 straight single-rooted teeth were instrumented to a diameter of 1.5 mm and irrigated with 5 mL of 3% NaOCl. Four horizontal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donnermeyer, David, Göbell, Lena, Bürklein, Sebastian, Dammaschke, Till, Schäfer, Edgar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31491864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12182860
_version_ 1783454631030947840
author Donnermeyer, David
Göbell, Lena
Bürklein, Sebastian
Dammaschke, Till
Schäfer, Edgar
author_facet Donnermeyer, David
Göbell, Lena
Bürklein, Sebastian
Dammaschke, Till
Schäfer, Edgar
author_sort Donnermeyer, David
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the influence of immersion duration and the type of immersion solution on the outcome of push-out bond strength (POBS) tests. Root canals of 120 straight single-rooted teeth were instrumented to a diameter of 1.5 mm and irrigated with 5 mL of 3% NaOCl. Four horizontal slices with a thickness of 1 mm were cut, representing the mid-portion of the root. The specimens (n = 480) were irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(EDTA) for 60 seconds, then twice with distilled water (DW) for 30 s each. The canals were filled with either AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Konstanz, Germany) or BioRoot RCS (Septodont, St. Maur-des-Fossés, France) (n = 240). Separated into four groups per type of sealer (n = 60), the specimens were incubated at 37 °C covered with gauze moistened in DW or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for either one or eight weeks. Dislodgement resistance was measured and POBS was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and the Student–Newman–Keuls test (p = 0.05). AH Plus showed higher POBS when stored in PBS compared to DW, irrespective of the incubation period (p < 0.05). BioRoot RCS displayed higher POBS when stored in DW compared to PBS after eight weeks of incubation (p < 0.05). No difference was found after one week of incubation (p > 0.05). Irrespective of the sealer or the immersion solution, POBS decreased from one week to eight weeks (p < 0.05). Mixed failure modes were found in all groups irrespective of sealer, immersion medium, or immersion period. POBS decreased after a longer incubation time in both immersion solutions. Duration of immersion and the type of immersion solution had a significant impact on the outcome of the POBS testing protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6766057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67660572019-09-30 Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols Donnermeyer, David Göbell, Lena Bürklein, Sebastian Dammaschke, Till Schäfer, Edgar Materials (Basel) Article This study aimed to investigate the influence of immersion duration and the type of immersion solution on the outcome of push-out bond strength (POBS) tests. Root canals of 120 straight single-rooted teeth were instrumented to a diameter of 1.5 mm and irrigated with 5 mL of 3% NaOCl. Four horizontal slices with a thickness of 1 mm were cut, representing the mid-portion of the root. The specimens (n = 480) were irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(EDTA) for 60 seconds, then twice with distilled water (DW) for 30 s each. The canals were filled with either AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Konstanz, Germany) or BioRoot RCS (Septodont, St. Maur-des-Fossés, France) (n = 240). Separated into four groups per type of sealer (n = 60), the specimens were incubated at 37 °C covered with gauze moistened in DW or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for either one or eight weeks. Dislodgement resistance was measured and POBS was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and the Student–Newman–Keuls test (p = 0.05). AH Plus showed higher POBS when stored in PBS compared to DW, irrespective of the incubation period (p < 0.05). BioRoot RCS displayed higher POBS when stored in DW compared to PBS after eight weeks of incubation (p < 0.05). No difference was found after one week of incubation (p > 0.05). Irrespective of the sealer or the immersion solution, POBS decreased from one week to eight weeks (p < 0.05). Mixed failure modes were found in all groups irrespective of sealer, immersion medium, or immersion period. POBS decreased after a longer incubation time in both immersion solutions. Duration of immersion and the type of immersion solution had a significant impact on the outcome of the POBS testing protocol. MDPI 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6766057/ /pubmed/31491864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12182860 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Donnermeyer, David
Göbell, Lena
Bürklein, Sebastian
Dammaschke, Till
Schäfer, Edgar
Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols
title Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols
title_full Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols
title_fullStr Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols
title_full_unstemmed Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols
title_short Duration of Immersion and Type of Immersion Solution Distort the Outcome of Push-Out Bond Strength Testing Protocols
title_sort duration of immersion and type of immersion solution distort the outcome of push-out bond strength testing protocols
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31491864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12182860
work_keys_str_mv AT donnermeyerdavid durationofimmersionandtypeofimmersionsolutiondistorttheoutcomeofpushoutbondstrengthtestingprotocols
AT gobelllena durationofimmersionandtypeofimmersionsolutiondistorttheoutcomeofpushoutbondstrengthtestingprotocols
AT burkleinsebastian durationofimmersionandtypeofimmersionsolutiondistorttheoutcomeofpushoutbondstrengthtestingprotocols
AT dammaschketill durationofimmersionandtypeofimmersionsolutiondistorttheoutcomeofpushoutbondstrengthtestingprotocols
AT schaferedgar durationofimmersionandtypeofimmersionsolutiondistorttheoutcomeofpushoutbondstrengthtestingprotocols