Cargando…

The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the compressive strength and fluoride ion release of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cement mixing methods (hand mix and mechanical mix) compared to ready-to-use ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) (Fuji II and Fuji II Caps)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Gilliard Lima, Carvalho, Ceci Nunes, Carvalho, Edilausson Moreno, Bauer, José, Leal, Adriana Mara Araújo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6834931
_version_ 1783454640912728064
author Oliveira, Gilliard Lima
Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
Carvalho, Edilausson Moreno
Bauer, José
Leal, Adriana Mara Araújo
author_facet Oliveira, Gilliard Lima
Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
Carvalho, Edilausson Moreno
Bauer, José
Leal, Adriana Mara Araújo
author_sort Oliveira, Gilliard Lima
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the compressive strength and fluoride ion release of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cement mixing methods (hand mix and mechanical mix) compared to ready-to-use ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) (Fuji II and Fuji II Caps), two resin-modified GICs (Fuji II LC and Fuji II L Caps), and one ready-to-use GIC (Ionoseal, Voco) were used. For the compressive strength test, cylindrical specimens (6 mm × 4 mm) of each group were prepared. The test was performed in a universal testing machine (EMIC DL2000). For the fluoride release test, specimens were prepared in the form of discs and placed in deionized/distilled water, which were replaced daily for 15 days. The fluoride ion release readings were performed on an electrode (Orion 96-09) connected to a digital ion analyzer (Quimis 0400ISE). The compressive strength data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, and the ion release data were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA (material vs. time) and Holm–Sidak post test (α = 5%). RESULTS: The one-way ANOVA showed statistical difference between the tested materials (p < 0.001). Ionoseal showed the highest values of compressive strength (p < 0.001). Mechanical manipulation increased the compressive strength only for conventional GIC, and resin-modified GIC did not present any statistical difference. Conventional GIC (mechanical mix) showed higher fluoride release on first day than the other groups tested. CONCLUSION: There was influence of the mixing methods of the materials on the compressive strength and fluoride release pattern of the glass ionomer cements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6766100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67661002019-10-21 The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements Oliveira, Gilliard Lima Carvalho, Ceci Nunes Carvalho, Edilausson Moreno Bauer, José Leal, Adriana Mara Araújo Int J Dent Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the compressive strength and fluoride ion release of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cement mixing methods (hand mix and mechanical mix) compared to ready-to-use ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) (Fuji II and Fuji II Caps), two resin-modified GICs (Fuji II LC and Fuji II L Caps), and one ready-to-use GIC (Ionoseal, Voco) were used. For the compressive strength test, cylindrical specimens (6 mm × 4 mm) of each group were prepared. The test was performed in a universal testing machine (EMIC DL2000). For the fluoride release test, specimens were prepared in the form of discs and placed in deionized/distilled water, which were replaced daily for 15 days. The fluoride ion release readings were performed on an electrode (Orion 96-09) connected to a digital ion analyzer (Quimis 0400ISE). The compressive strength data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, and the ion release data were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA (material vs. time) and Holm–Sidak post test (α = 5%). RESULTS: The one-way ANOVA showed statistical difference between the tested materials (p < 0.001). Ionoseal showed the highest values of compressive strength (p < 0.001). Mechanical manipulation increased the compressive strength only for conventional GIC, and resin-modified GIC did not present any statistical difference. Conventional GIC (mechanical mix) showed higher fluoride release on first day than the other groups tested. CONCLUSION: There was influence of the mixing methods of the materials on the compressive strength and fluoride release pattern of the glass ionomer cements. Hindawi 2019-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6766100/ /pubmed/31636672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6834931 Text en Copyright © 2019 Gilliard Lima Oliveira et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oliveira, Gilliard Lima
Carvalho, Ceci Nunes
Carvalho, Edilausson Moreno
Bauer, José
Leal, Adriana Mara Araújo
The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements
title The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements
title_full The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements
title_fullStr The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements
title_short The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements
title_sort influence of mixing methods on the compressive strength and fluoride release of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31636672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6834931
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiragilliardlima theinfluenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements
AT carvalhocecinunes theinfluenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements
AT carvalhoedilaussonmoreno theinfluenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements
AT bauerjose theinfluenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements
AT lealadrianamaraaraujo theinfluenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements
AT oliveiragilliardlima influenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements
AT carvalhocecinunes influenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements
AT carvalhoedilaussonmoreno influenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements
AT bauerjose influenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements
AT lealadrianamaraaraujo influenceofmixingmethodsonthecompressivestrengthandfluoridereleaseofconventionalandresinmodifiedglassionomercements