Cargando…

Patient respiratory‐triggered quantitative T(2) mapping in the pancreas

BACKGROUND: Long acquisition times and motion sensitivity limit T(2) mapping in the abdomen. Accelerated mapping at 3 T may allow for quantitative assessment of diffuse pancreatic disease in patients during free‐breathing. PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of respiratory‐triggered quantitative T(2) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vietti Violi, Naïk, Hilbert, Tom, Bastiaansen, Jessica A.M., Knebel, Jean‐Francois, Ledoux, Jean‐Baptiste, Stemmer, Alto, Meuli, Reto, Kober, Tobias, Schmidt, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30637852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26612
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Long acquisition times and motion sensitivity limit T(2) mapping in the abdomen. Accelerated mapping at 3 T may allow for quantitative assessment of diffuse pancreatic disease in patients during free‐breathing. PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of respiratory‐triggered quantitative T(2) analysis in the pancreas and correlate T(2)‐values with age, body mass index, pancreatic location, main pancreatic duct dilatation, and underlying pathology. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective single‐center pilot study. POPULATION: Eighty‐eight adults. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Ten‐fold accelerated multiecho‐spin‐echo 3 T MRI sequence to quantify T(2) at 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Two radiologists independently delineated three regions of interest inside the pancreatic head, body, and tail for each acquisition. Means and standard deviations for T(2) values in these regions were determined. T(2)‐value variation with demographic data, intraparenchymal location, pancreatic duct dilation, and underlying pancreatic disease was assessed. STATISTICAL TESTS: Interreader reliability was determined by calculating the interclass coefficient (ICCs). T(2) values were compared for different pancreatic locations by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Interpatient associations between T(2) values and demographical, clinical, and radiological data were calculated (ANOVA). RESULTS: The accelerated T(2) mapping sequence was successfully performed in all participants (mean acquisition time, 2:48 ± 0:43 min). Low T(2) value variability was observed across all patients (intersubject) (head: 60.2 ± 8.3 msec, body: 63.9 ± 11.5 msec, tail: 66.8 ± 16.4 msec). Interreader agreement was good (ICC, 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.77–0.86). T(2)‐values differed significantly depending on age (P < 0.001), location (P < 0.001), main pancreatic duct dilatation (P < 0.001), and diffuse pancreatic disease (P < 0.03). DATA CONCLUSION: The feasibility of accelerated T(2) mapping at 3 T in moving abdominal organs was demonstrated in the pancreas, since T(2) values were stable and reproducible. In the pancreatic parenchyma, T(2)‐values were significantly dependent on demographic and clinical parameters. Level of Evidence: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:410–416.