Cargando…

Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards

Herbaceous plants harbour species‐rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. Although some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects. Here we show through a meta‐a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gange, Alan C., Koricheva, Julia, Currie, Amanda F., Jaber, Lara R., Vidal, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15859
_version_ 1783454789294620672
author Gange, Alan C.
Koricheva, Julia
Currie, Amanda F.
Jaber, Lara R.
Vidal, Stefan
author_facet Gange, Alan C.
Koricheva, Julia
Currie, Amanda F.
Jaber, Lara R.
Vidal, Stefan
author_sort Gange, Alan C.
collection PubMed
description Herbaceous plants harbour species‐rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. Although some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects. Here we show through a meta‐analysis that both entomopathogenic and nonentomopathogenic endophytes have a negative effect on insect herbivores. Growth and performance of polyphagous and sucking insects are reduced by nonentomopathogenic endophytes, but monophages are unaffected, likely because the latter are better adapted to secondary metabolites produced or induced by the fungi. Furthermore, studies using excised leaves report weaker effects than those with intact plants, likely caused by chemical changes being masked by leaf excision. Most surprisingly, endophyte infection of seeds produces the greatest effect on insect herbivores in subsequent mature plants, even though the usual mode of fungal transmission is infection of leaves by airborne spores. We conclude that these ubiquitous hidden fungi may be important bodyguards of plants. However, in order to fully understand their roles in plant protection, we must be aware that minor differences in experimental design can lead to contradictory results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6766880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67668802019-10-01 Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards Gange, Alan C. Koricheva, Julia Currie, Amanda F. Jaber, Lara R. Vidal, Stefan New Phytol Research Herbaceous plants harbour species‐rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. Although some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects. Here we show through a meta‐analysis that both entomopathogenic and nonentomopathogenic endophytes have a negative effect on insect herbivores. Growth and performance of polyphagous and sucking insects are reduced by nonentomopathogenic endophytes, but monophages are unaffected, likely because the latter are better adapted to secondary metabolites produced or induced by the fungi. Furthermore, studies using excised leaves report weaker effects than those with intact plants, likely caused by chemical changes being masked by leaf excision. Most surprisingly, endophyte infection of seeds produces the greatest effect on insect herbivores in subsequent mature plants, even though the usual mode of fungal transmission is infection of leaves by airborne spores. We conclude that these ubiquitous hidden fungi may be important bodyguards of plants. However, in order to fully understand their roles in plant protection, we must be aware that minor differences in experimental design can lead to contradictory results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-13 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6766880/ /pubmed/31002383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15859 Text en © 2019 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2019 New Phytologist Trust This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gange, Alan C.
Koricheva, Julia
Currie, Amanda F.
Jaber, Lara R.
Vidal, Stefan
Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards
title Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards
title_full Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards
title_fullStr Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards
title_full_unstemmed Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards
title_short Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards
title_sort meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15859
work_keys_str_mv AT gangealanc metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards
AT korichevajulia metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards
AT currieamandaf metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards
AT jaberlarar metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards
AT vidalstefan metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards