Cargando…
Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards
Herbaceous plants harbour species‐rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. Although some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects. Here we show through a meta‐a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15859 |
_version_ | 1783454789294620672 |
---|---|
author | Gange, Alan C. Koricheva, Julia Currie, Amanda F. Jaber, Lara R. Vidal, Stefan |
author_facet | Gange, Alan C. Koricheva, Julia Currie, Amanda F. Jaber, Lara R. Vidal, Stefan |
author_sort | Gange, Alan C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Herbaceous plants harbour species‐rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. Although some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects. Here we show through a meta‐analysis that both entomopathogenic and nonentomopathogenic endophytes have a negative effect on insect herbivores. Growth and performance of polyphagous and sucking insects are reduced by nonentomopathogenic endophytes, but monophages are unaffected, likely because the latter are better adapted to secondary metabolites produced or induced by the fungi. Furthermore, studies using excised leaves report weaker effects than those with intact plants, likely caused by chemical changes being masked by leaf excision. Most surprisingly, endophyte infection of seeds produces the greatest effect on insect herbivores in subsequent mature plants, even though the usual mode of fungal transmission is infection of leaves by airborne spores. We conclude that these ubiquitous hidden fungi may be important bodyguards of plants. However, in order to fully understand their roles in plant protection, we must be aware that minor differences in experimental design can lead to contradictory results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6766880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67668802019-10-01 Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards Gange, Alan C. Koricheva, Julia Currie, Amanda F. Jaber, Lara R. Vidal, Stefan New Phytol Research Herbaceous plants harbour species‐rich communities of asymptomatic endophytic fungi. Although some of these endophytes are entomopathogenic, many are not, and remarkably little is known about how the presence of these fungi in plant tissues affects phytophagous insects. Here we show through a meta‐analysis that both entomopathogenic and nonentomopathogenic endophytes have a negative effect on insect herbivores. Growth and performance of polyphagous and sucking insects are reduced by nonentomopathogenic endophytes, but monophages are unaffected, likely because the latter are better adapted to secondary metabolites produced or induced by the fungi. Furthermore, studies using excised leaves report weaker effects than those with intact plants, likely caused by chemical changes being masked by leaf excision. Most surprisingly, endophyte infection of seeds produces the greatest effect on insect herbivores in subsequent mature plants, even though the usual mode of fungal transmission is infection of leaves by airborne spores. We conclude that these ubiquitous hidden fungi may be important bodyguards of plants. However, in order to fully understand their roles in plant protection, we must be aware that minor differences in experimental design can lead to contradictory results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-13 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6766880/ /pubmed/31002383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15859 Text en © 2019 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2019 New Phytologist Trust This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Gange, Alan C. Koricheva, Julia Currie, Amanda F. Jaber, Lara R. Vidal, Stefan Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards |
title | Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards |
title_full | Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards |
title_fullStr | Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards |
title_short | Meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards |
title_sort | meta‐analysis of the role of entomopathogenic and unspecialized fungal endophytes as plant bodyguards |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6766880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gangealanc metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards AT korichevajulia metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards AT currieamandaf metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards AT jaberlarar metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards AT vidalstefan metaanalysisoftheroleofentomopathogenicandunspecializedfungalendophytesasplantbodyguards |