Cargando…

Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial

Introduction: ACT DMD was a 48‐week trial of ataluren for nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). Patients received corticosteroids for ≥6 months at entry and stable regimens throughout study. This post hoc analysis compares efficacy and safety for deflazacort and prednisone/prednisol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shieh, Perry B., Mcintosh, Joseph, Jin, Fengbin, Souza, Marcio, Elfring, Gary, Narayanan, Siva, Trifillis, Panayiota, Peltz, Stuart W., Mcdonald, Craig M., Darras, Basil T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30028519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26191
_version_ 1783454824870707200
author Shieh, Perry B.
Mcintosh, Joseph
Jin, Fengbin
Souza, Marcio
Elfring, Gary
Narayanan, Siva
Trifillis, Panayiota
Peltz, Stuart W.
Mcdonald, Craig M.
Darras, Basil T.
author_facet Shieh, Perry B.
Mcintosh, Joseph
Jin, Fengbin
Souza, Marcio
Elfring, Gary
Narayanan, Siva
Trifillis, Panayiota
Peltz, Stuart W.
Mcdonald, Craig M.
Darras, Basil T.
author_sort Shieh, Perry B.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: ACT DMD was a 48‐week trial of ataluren for nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). Patients received corticosteroids for ≥6 months at entry and stable regimens throughout study. This post hoc analysis compares efficacy and safety for deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone in the placebo arm. Methods: Patients received deflazacort (n = 53) or prednisone/prednisolone (n = 61). Endpoints included change from baseline in 6‐minute walk distance (6MWD), timed function tests, estimated age at loss of ambulation (extrapolated from 6MWD). Results: Mean changes in 6MWD were ‐39.0 m (deflazacort; 95% confidence limit [CL], ‐68.85, ‐9.17) and ‐70.6 m (prednisone/prednisolone; 95% CL, ‐97.16, ‐44.02). Mean changes in 4‐stair climb were 3.79 s (deflazacort; 95% CL, 1.54, 6.03) and 6.67 s (prednisone/prednisolone; 95% CL, 4.69, 8.64). Conclusions: This analysis, limited by its post hoc nature, suggests greater preservation of 6MWD and 4‐stair climb with deflazacort vs. prednisone/prednisolone. A head‐to‐head comparison will better define these differences. Muscle Nerve 58: 639–645, 2018
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67670372019-10-01 Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial Shieh, Perry B. Mcintosh, Joseph Jin, Fengbin Souza, Marcio Elfring, Gary Narayanan, Siva Trifillis, Panayiota Peltz, Stuart W. Mcdonald, Craig M. Darras, Basil T. Muscle Nerve Clinical Research Introduction: ACT DMD was a 48‐week trial of ataluren for nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). Patients received corticosteroids for ≥6 months at entry and stable regimens throughout study. This post hoc analysis compares efficacy and safety for deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone in the placebo arm. Methods: Patients received deflazacort (n = 53) or prednisone/prednisolone (n = 61). Endpoints included change from baseline in 6‐minute walk distance (6MWD), timed function tests, estimated age at loss of ambulation (extrapolated from 6MWD). Results: Mean changes in 6MWD were ‐39.0 m (deflazacort; 95% confidence limit [CL], ‐68.85, ‐9.17) and ‐70.6 m (prednisone/prednisolone; 95% CL, ‐97.16, ‐44.02). Mean changes in 4‐stair climb were 3.79 s (deflazacort; 95% CL, 1.54, 6.03) and 6.67 s (prednisone/prednisolone; 95% CL, 4.69, 8.64). Conclusions: This analysis, limited by its post hoc nature, suggests greater preservation of 6MWD and 4‐stair climb with deflazacort vs. prednisone/prednisolone. A head‐to‐head comparison will better define these differences. Muscle Nerve 58: 639–645, 2018 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-27 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6767037/ /pubmed/30028519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26191 Text en © 2018 The Authors Muscle & Nerve Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Shieh, Perry B.
Mcintosh, Joseph
Jin, Fengbin
Souza, Marcio
Elfring, Gary
Narayanan, Siva
Trifillis, Panayiota
Peltz, Stuart W.
Mcdonald, Craig M.
Darras, Basil T.
Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial
title Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial
title_full Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial
title_fullStr Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial
title_full_unstemmed Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial
title_short Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial
title_sort deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: a post hoc analysis from the act dmd trial
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30028519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26191
work_keys_str_mv AT shiehperryb deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT mcintoshjoseph deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT jinfengbin deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT souzamarcio deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT elfringgary deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT narayanansiva deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT trifillispanayiota deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT peltzstuartw deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT mcdonaldcraigm deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT darrasbasilt deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial
AT deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial