Cargando…
Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial
Introduction: ACT DMD was a 48‐week trial of ataluren for nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). Patients received corticosteroids for ≥6 months at entry and stable regimens throughout study. This post hoc analysis compares efficacy and safety for deflazacort and prednisone/prednisol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30028519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26191 |
_version_ | 1783454824870707200 |
---|---|
author | Shieh, Perry B. Mcintosh, Joseph Jin, Fengbin Souza, Marcio Elfring, Gary Narayanan, Siva Trifillis, Panayiota Peltz, Stuart W. Mcdonald, Craig M. Darras, Basil T. |
author_facet | Shieh, Perry B. Mcintosh, Joseph Jin, Fengbin Souza, Marcio Elfring, Gary Narayanan, Siva Trifillis, Panayiota Peltz, Stuart W. Mcdonald, Craig M. Darras, Basil T. |
author_sort | Shieh, Perry B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: ACT DMD was a 48‐week trial of ataluren for nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). Patients received corticosteroids for ≥6 months at entry and stable regimens throughout study. This post hoc analysis compares efficacy and safety for deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone in the placebo arm. Methods: Patients received deflazacort (n = 53) or prednisone/prednisolone (n = 61). Endpoints included change from baseline in 6‐minute walk distance (6MWD), timed function tests, estimated age at loss of ambulation (extrapolated from 6MWD). Results: Mean changes in 6MWD were ‐39.0 m (deflazacort; 95% confidence limit [CL], ‐68.85, ‐9.17) and ‐70.6 m (prednisone/prednisolone; 95% CL, ‐97.16, ‐44.02). Mean changes in 4‐stair climb were 3.79 s (deflazacort; 95% CL, 1.54, 6.03) and 6.67 s (prednisone/prednisolone; 95% CL, 4.69, 8.64). Conclusions: This analysis, limited by its post hoc nature, suggests greater preservation of 6MWD and 4‐stair climb with deflazacort vs. prednisone/prednisolone. A head‐to‐head comparison will better define these differences. Muscle Nerve 58: 639–645, 2018 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6767037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67670372019-10-01 Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial Shieh, Perry B. Mcintosh, Joseph Jin, Fengbin Souza, Marcio Elfring, Gary Narayanan, Siva Trifillis, Panayiota Peltz, Stuart W. Mcdonald, Craig M. Darras, Basil T. Muscle Nerve Clinical Research Introduction: ACT DMD was a 48‐week trial of ataluren for nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy (nmDMD). Patients received corticosteroids for ≥6 months at entry and stable regimens throughout study. This post hoc analysis compares efficacy and safety for deflazacort and prednisone/prednisolone in the placebo arm. Methods: Patients received deflazacort (n = 53) or prednisone/prednisolone (n = 61). Endpoints included change from baseline in 6‐minute walk distance (6MWD), timed function tests, estimated age at loss of ambulation (extrapolated from 6MWD). Results: Mean changes in 6MWD were ‐39.0 m (deflazacort; 95% confidence limit [CL], ‐68.85, ‐9.17) and ‐70.6 m (prednisone/prednisolone; 95% CL, ‐97.16, ‐44.02). Mean changes in 4‐stair climb were 3.79 s (deflazacort; 95% CL, 1.54, 6.03) and 6.67 s (prednisone/prednisolone; 95% CL, 4.69, 8.64). Conclusions: This analysis, limited by its post hoc nature, suggests greater preservation of 6MWD and 4‐stair climb with deflazacort vs. prednisone/prednisolone. A head‐to‐head comparison will better define these differences. Muscle Nerve 58: 639–645, 2018 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-27 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6767037/ /pubmed/30028519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26191 Text en © 2018 The Authors Muscle & Nerve Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Shieh, Perry B. Mcintosh, Joseph Jin, Fengbin Souza, Marcio Elfring, Gary Narayanan, Siva Trifillis, Panayiota Peltz, Stuart W. Mcdonald, Craig M. Darras, Basil T. Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial |
title | Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial |
title_full | Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial |
title_fullStr | Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial |
title_short | Deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: A post HOC analysis from the ACT DMD trial |
title_sort | deflazacort versus prednisone/prednisolone for maintaining motor function and delaying loss of ambulation: a post hoc analysis from the act dmd trial |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30028519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.26191 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shiehperryb deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT mcintoshjoseph deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT jinfengbin deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT souzamarcio deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT elfringgary deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT narayanansiva deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT trifillispanayiota deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT peltzstuartw deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT mcdonaldcraigm deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT darrasbasilt deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial AT deflazacortversusprednisoneprednisoloneformaintainingmotorfunctionanddelayinglossofambulationaposthocanalysisfromtheactdmdtrial |