Cargando…

Comparing the effects of ipragliflozin versus metformin on visceral fat reduction and metabolic dysfunction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin: A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study (PRIME‐V study)

A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with ipragliflozin (sodium‐dependent glucose transporter‐2 inhibitor) versus metformin for visceral fat reduction and glycaemic control among Japanese patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koshizaka, Masaya, Ishikawa, Ko, Ishibashi, Ryoichi, Maezawa, Yoshiro, Sakamoto, Kenichi, Uchida, Daigaku, Nakamura, Susumu, Yamaga, Masaya, Yokoh, Hidetaka, Kobayashi, Akina, Onishi, Shunichiro, Kobayashi, Kazuki, Ogino, Jun, Hashimoto, Naotake, Tokuyama, Hirotake, Shimada, Fumio, Ohara, Emi, Ishikawa, Takahiro, Shoji, Mayumi, Ide, Shintaro, Ide, Kana, Baba, Yusuke, Hattori, Akiko, Kitamoto, Takumi, Horikoshi, Takuro, Shimofusa, Ryota, Takahashi, Sho, Nagashima, Kengo, Sato, Yasunori, Takemoto, Minoru, Newby, Laura Kristin, Yokote, Koutaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13750
_version_ 1783454833563402240
author Koshizaka, Masaya
Ishikawa, Ko
Ishibashi, Ryoichi
Maezawa, Yoshiro
Sakamoto, Kenichi
Uchida, Daigaku
Nakamura, Susumu
Yamaga, Masaya
Yokoh, Hidetaka
Kobayashi, Akina
Onishi, Shunichiro
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Ogino, Jun
Hashimoto, Naotake
Tokuyama, Hirotake
Shimada, Fumio
Ohara, Emi
Ishikawa, Takahiro
Shoji, Mayumi
Ide, Shintaro
Ide, Kana
Baba, Yusuke
Hattori, Akiko
Kitamoto, Takumi
Horikoshi, Takuro
Shimofusa, Ryota
Takahashi, Sho
Nagashima, Kengo
Sato, Yasunori
Takemoto, Minoru
Newby, Laura Kristin
Yokote, Koutaro
author_facet Koshizaka, Masaya
Ishikawa, Ko
Ishibashi, Ryoichi
Maezawa, Yoshiro
Sakamoto, Kenichi
Uchida, Daigaku
Nakamura, Susumu
Yamaga, Masaya
Yokoh, Hidetaka
Kobayashi, Akina
Onishi, Shunichiro
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Ogino, Jun
Hashimoto, Naotake
Tokuyama, Hirotake
Shimada, Fumio
Ohara, Emi
Ishikawa, Takahiro
Shoji, Mayumi
Ide, Shintaro
Ide, Kana
Baba, Yusuke
Hattori, Akiko
Kitamoto, Takumi
Horikoshi, Takuro
Shimofusa, Ryota
Takahashi, Sho
Nagashima, Kengo
Sato, Yasunori
Takemoto, Minoru
Newby, Laura Kristin
Yokote, Koutaro
author_sort Koshizaka, Masaya
collection PubMed
description A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with ipragliflozin (sodium‐dependent glucose transporter‐2 inhibitor) versus metformin for visceral fat reduction and glycaemic control among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin, HbA1c levels of 7%‐10%, and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 22 kg/m(2). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ipragliflozin 50 mg or metformin 1000‐1500 mg daily. The primary outcome was change in visceral fat area as measured by computed tomography after 24 weeks of therapy. The secondary outcomes were effects on glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism. Mean percentage reduction in visceral fat area was significantly greater in the ipragliflozin group than in the metformin group (−12.06% vs. −3.65%, P = 0.040). Ipragliflozin also significantly reduced BMI, subcutaneous fat area, waist circumference, fasting insulin, and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)‐resistance, and increased HDL‐cholesterol levels. Metformin significantly reduced HbA1c and LDL‐cholesterol levels and increased HOMA‐beta. There were no severe adverse events. The use of ipragliflozin or metformin in combination with dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, widely used in Japan, may have beneficial effects in ameliorating multiple cardiovascular risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67670752019-10-01 Comparing the effects of ipragliflozin versus metformin on visceral fat reduction and metabolic dysfunction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin: A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study (PRIME‐V study) Koshizaka, Masaya Ishikawa, Ko Ishibashi, Ryoichi Maezawa, Yoshiro Sakamoto, Kenichi Uchida, Daigaku Nakamura, Susumu Yamaga, Masaya Yokoh, Hidetaka Kobayashi, Akina Onishi, Shunichiro Kobayashi, Kazuki Ogino, Jun Hashimoto, Naotake Tokuyama, Hirotake Shimada, Fumio Ohara, Emi Ishikawa, Takahiro Shoji, Mayumi Ide, Shintaro Ide, Kana Baba, Yusuke Hattori, Akiko Kitamoto, Takumi Horikoshi, Takuro Shimofusa, Ryota Takahashi, Sho Nagashima, Kengo Sato, Yasunori Takemoto, Minoru Newby, Laura Kristin Yokote, Koutaro Diabetes Obes Metab Brief Reports A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with ipragliflozin (sodium‐dependent glucose transporter‐2 inhibitor) versus metformin for visceral fat reduction and glycaemic control among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin, HbA1c levels of 7%‐10%, and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 22 kg/m(2). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ipragliflozin 50 mg or metformin 1000‐1500 mg daily. The primary outcome was change in visceral fat area as measured by computed tomography after 24 weeks of therapy. The secondary outcomes were effects on glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism. Mean percentage reduction in visceral fat area was significantly greater in the ipragliflozin group than in the metformin group (−12.06% vs. −3.65%, P = 0.040). Ipragliflozin also significantly reduced BMI, subcutaneous fat area, waist circumference, fasting insulin, and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)‐resistance, and increased HDL‐cholesterol levels. Metformin significantly reduced HbA1c and LDL‐cholesterol levels and increased HOMA‐beta. There were no severe adverse events. The use of ipragliflozin or metformin in combination with dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, widely used in Japan, may have beneficial effects in ameliorating multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-05-08 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6767075/ /pubmed/30993861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13750 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Reports
Koshizaka, Masaya
Ishikawa, Ko
Ishibashi, Ryoichi
Maezawa, Yoshiro
Sakamoto, Kenichi
Uchida, Daigaku
Nakamura, Susumu
Yamaga, Masaya
Yokoh, Hidetaka
Kobayashi, Akina
Onishi, Shunichiro
Kobayashi, Kazuki
Ogino, Jun
Hashimoto, Naotake
Tokuyama, Hirotake
Shimada, Fumio
Ohara, Emi
Ishikawa, Takahiro
Shoji, Mayumi
Ide, Shintaro
Ide, Kana
Baba, Yusuke
Hattori, Akiko
Kitamoto, Takumi
Horikoshi, Takuro
Shimofusa, Ryota
Takahashi, Sho
Nagashima, Kengo
Sato, Yasunori
Takemoto, Minoru
Newby, Laura Kristin
Yokote, Koutaro
Comparing the effects of ipragliflozin versus metformin on visceral fat reduction and metabolic dysfunction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin: A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study (PRIME‐V study)
title Comparing the effects of ipragliflozin versus metformin on visceral fat reduction and metabolic dysfunction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin: A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study (PRIME‐V study)
title_full Comparing the effects of ipragliflozin versus metformin on visceral fat reduction and metabolic dysfunction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin: A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study (PRIME‐V study)
title_fullStr Comparing the effects of ipragliflozin versus metformin on visceral fat reduction and metabolic dysfunction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin: A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study (PRIME‐V study)
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effects of ipragliflozin versus metformin on visceral fat reduction and metabolic dysfunction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin: A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study (PRIME‐V study)
title_short Comparing the effects of ipragliflozin versus metformin on visceral fat reduction and metabolic dysfunction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin: A prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study (PRIME‐V study)
title_sort comparing the effects of ipragliflozin versus metformin on visceral fat reduction and metabolic dysfunction in japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sitagliptin: a prospective, multicentre, open‐label, blinded‐endpoint, randomized controlled study (prime‐v study)
topic Brief Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30993861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13750
work_keys_str_mv AT koshizakamasaya comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT ishikawako comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT ishibashiryoichi comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT maezawayoshiro comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT sakamotokenichi comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT uchidadaigaku comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT nakamurasusumu comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT yamagamasaya comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT yokohhidetaka comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT kobayashiakina comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT onishishunichiro comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT kobayashikazuki comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT oginojun comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT hashimotonaotake comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT tokuyamahirotake comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT shimadafumio comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT oharaemi comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT ishikawatakahiro comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT shojimayumi comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT ideshintaro comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT idekana comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT babayusuke comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT hattoriakiko comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT kitamototakumi comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT horikoshitakuro comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT shimofusaryota comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT takahashisho comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT nagashimakengo comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT satoyasunori comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT takemotominoru comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT newbylaurakristin comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT yokotekoutaro comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy
AT comparingtheeffectsofipragliflozinversusmetforminonvisceralfatreductionandmetabolicdysfunctioninjapanesepatientswithtype2diabetestreatedwithsitagliptinaprospectivemulticentreopenlabelblindedendpointrandomizedcontrolledstudyprimevstudy