Cargando…
Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model
BACKGROUND: The Onvision needle tip tracking (NTT) is a new technology consisting of a needle with an ultrasound sensor close to the needle tip and a console for computerised signal processing. The aim of the study was to evaluate NTT technology during ultrasound‐guided simulated peripheral nerve bl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31037724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13379 |
_version_ | 1783454848122880000 |
---|---|
author | Kåsine, Trine Romundstad, Luis Rosseland, Leiv Arne Ullensvang, Kyrre Fagerland, Morten Wang Hol, Per Kristian Kessler, Paul Sauter, Axel Rudolf |
author_facet | Kåsine, Trine Romundstad, Luis Rosseland, Leiv Arne Ullensvang, Kyrre Fagerland, Morten Wang Hol, Per Kristian Kessler, Paul Sauter, Axel Rudolf |
author_sort | Kåsine, Trine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Onvision needle tip tracking (NTT) is a new technology consisting of a needle with an ultrasound sensor close to the needle tip and a console for computerised signal processing. The aim of the study was to evaluate NTT technology during ultrasound‐guided simulated peripheral nerve block procedures in a porcine phantom model. METHODS: Forty anaesthesiologists performed in‐plane and out‐of‐plane simulated nerve blocks with and without NTT guidance. The primary outcome measure was procedure time. Secondary outcomes were hand movements and the path length travelled by the hands measured by motion analysis, precision of the needle tip related to the target structure, success rates and violations of the target structure, and the participants confidence whether their procedure would be successful or not. RESULTS: Procedure time was reduced from 66.7 (SD = 47.5) seconds to 43.8 (SD = 29.2) seconds when NTT was used for out‐of‐plane procedures (P = 0.002). The number of hand movements of the probe hand was 13.9 (SD = 30.2) with NTT and 22.8 (SD = 30.0) without NTT (P = 0.019). No significant differences were registered during the performance of in‐plane procedures. The participants confidence in a presumed block success was increased with both in‐plane procedures (8.50 (SD = 1.18) with NTT vs 7.65 (SD = 1.96), P = 0.004) and out‐of‐plane procedures (8.50 (SD = 1.09) vs 7.10 (SD = 1.89), P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The new NTT technology significantly reduced the procedure time and the number of hand movements for ultrasound‐guided out‐of‐plane PNB procedures. No significant differences were found for the in‐plane procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6767137 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67671372019-10-03 Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model Kåsine, Trine Romundstad, Luis Rosseland, Leiv Arne Ullensvang, Kyrre Fagerland, Morten Wang Hol, Per Kristian Kessler, Paul Sauter, Axel Rudolf Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy BACKGROUND: The Onvision needle tip tracking (NTT) is a new technology consisting of a needle with an ultrasound sensor close to the needle tip and a console for computerised signal processing. The aim of the study was to evaluate NTT technology during ultrasound‐guided simulated peripheral nerve block procedures in a porcine phantom model. METHODS: Forty anaesthesiologists performed in‐plane and out‐of‐plane simulated nerve blocks with and without NTT guidance. The primary outcome measure was procedure time. Secondary outcomes were hand movements and the path length travelled by the hands measured by motion analysis, precision of the needle tip related to the target structure, success rates and violations of the target structure, and the participants confidence whether their procedure would be successful or not. RESULTS: Procedure time was reduced from 66.7 (SD = 47.5) seconds to 43.8 (SD = 29.2) seconds when NTT was used for out‐of‐plane procedures (P = 0.002). The number of hand movements of the probe hand was 13.9 (SD = 30.2) with NTT and 22.8 (SD = 30.0) without NTT (P = 0.019). No significant differences were registered during the performance of in‐plane procedures. The participants confidence in a presumed block success was increased with both in‐plane procedures (8.50 (SD = 1.18) with NTT vs 7.65 (SD = 1.96), P = 0.004) and out‐of‐plane procedures (8.50 (SD = 1.09) vs 7.10 (SD = 1.89), P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The new NTT technology significantly reduced the procedure time and the number of hand movements for ultrasound‐guided out‐of‐plane PNB procedures. No significant differences were found for the in‐plane procedures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-30 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6767137/ /pubmed/31037724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13379 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Kåsine, Trine Romundstad, Luis Rosseland, Leiv Arne Ullensvang, Kyrre Fagerland, Morten Wang Hol, Per Kristian Kessler, Paul Sauter, Axel Rudolf Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model |
title | Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model |
title_full | Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model |
title_fullStr | Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model |
title_full_unstemmed | Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model |
title_short | Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model |
title_sort | needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—an observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model |
topic | Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767137/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31037724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasinetrine needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel AT romundstadluis needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel AT rosselandleivarne needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel AT ullensvangkyrre needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel AT fagerlandmortenwang needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel AT holperkristian needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel AT kesslerpaul needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel AT sauteraxelrudolf needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel |