Cargando…

Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model

BACKGROUND: The Onvision needle tip tracking (NTT) is a new technology consisting of a needle with an ultrasound sensor close to the needle tip and a console for computerised signal processing. The aim of the study was to evaluate NTT technology during ultrasound‐guided simulated peripheral nerve bl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kåsine, Trine, Romundstad, Luis, Rosseland, Leiv Arne, Ullensvang, Kyrre, Fagerland, Morten Wang, Hol, Per Kristian, Kessler, Paul, Sauter, Axel Rudolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31037724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13379
_version_ 1783454848122880000
author Kåsine, Trine
Romundstad, Luis
Rosseland, Leiv Arne
Ullensvang, Kyrre
Fagerland, Morten Wang
Hol, Per Kristian
Kessler, Paul
Sauter, Axel Rudolf
author_facet Kåsine, Trine
Romundstad, Luis
Rosseland, Leiv Arne
Ullensvang, Kyrre
Fagerland, Morten Wang
Hol, Per Kristian
Kessler, Paul
Sauter, Axel Rudolf
author_sort Kåsine, Trine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Onvision needle tip tracking (NTT) is a new technology consisting of a needle with an ultrasound sensor close to the needle tip and a console for computerised signal processing. The aim of the study was to evaluate NTT technology during ultrasound‐guided simulated peripheral nerve block procedures in a porcine phantom model. METHODS: Forty anaesthesiologists performed in‐plane and out‐of‐plane simulated nerve blocks with and without NTT guidance. The primary outcome measure was procedure time. Secondary outcomes were hand movements and the path length travelled by the hands measured by motion analysis, precision of the needle tip related to the target structure, success rates and violations of the target structure, and the participants confidence whether their procedure would be successful or not. RESULTS: Procedure time was reduced from 66.7 (SD = 47.5) seconds to 43.8 (SD = 29.2) seconds when NTT was used for out‐of‐plane procedures (P = 0.002). The number of hand movements of the probe hand was 13.9 (SD = 30.2) with NTT and 22.8 (SD = 30.0) without NTT (P = 0.019). No significant differences were registered during the performance of in‐plane procedures. The participants confidence in a presumed block success was increased with both in‐plane procedures (8.50 (SD = 1.18) with NTT vs 7.65 (SD = 1.96), P = 0.004) and out‐of‐plane procedures (8.50 (SD = 1.09) vs 7.10 (SD = 1.89), P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The new NTT technology significantly reduced the procedure time and the number of hand movements for ultrasound‐guided out‐of‐plane PNB procedures. No significant differences were found for the in‐plane procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767137
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67671372019-10-03 Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model Kåsine, Trine Romundstad, Luis Rosseland, Leiv Arne Ullensvang, Kyrre Fagerland, Morten Wang Hol, Per Kristian Kessler, Paul Sauter, Axel Rudolf Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy BACKGROUND: The Onvision needle tip tracking (NTT) is a new technology consisting of a needle with an ultrasound sensor close to the needle tip and a console for computerised signal processing. The aim of the study was to evaluate NTT technology during ultrasound‐guided simulated peripheral nerve block procedures in a porcine phantom model. METHODS: Forty anaesthesiologists performed in‐plane and out‐of‐plane simulated nerve blocks with and without NTT guidance. The primary outcome measure was procedure time. Secondary outcomes were hand movements and the path length travelled by the hands measured by motion analysis, precision of the needle tip related to the target structure, success rates and violations of the target structure, and the participants confidence whether their procedure would be successful or not. RESULTS: Procedure time was reduced from 66.7 (SD = 47.5) seconds to 43.8 (SD = 29.2) seconds when NTT was used for out‐of‐plane procedures (P = 0.002). The number of hand movements of the probe hand was 13.9 (SD = 30.2) with NTT and 22.8 (SD = 30.0) without NTT (P = 0.019). No significant differences were registered during the performance of in‐plane procedures. The participants confidence in a presumed block success was increased with both in‐plane procedures (8.50 (SD = 1.18) with NTT vs 7.65 (SD = 1.96), P = 0.004) and out‐of‐plane procedures (8.50 (SD = 1.09) vs 7.10 (SD = 1.89), P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The new NTT technology significantly reduced the procedure time and the number of hand movements for ultrasound‐guided out‐of‐plane PNB procedures. No significant differences were found for the in‐plane procedures. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-30 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6767137/ /pubmed/31037724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13379 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy
Kåsine, Trine
Romundstad, Luis
Rosseland, Leiv Arne
Ullensvang, Kyrre
Fagerland, Morten Wang
Hol, Per Kristian
Kessler, Paul
Sauter, Axel Rudolf
Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model
title Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model
title_full Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model
title_fullStr Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model
title_full_unstemmed Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model
title_short Needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—An observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model
title_sort needle tip tracking for ultrasound‐guided peripheral nerve block procedures—an observer blinded, randomised, controlled, crossover study on a phantom model
topic Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767137/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31037724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.13379
work_keys_str_mv AT kasinetrine needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel
AT romundstadluis needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel
AT rosselandleivarne needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel
AT ullensvangkyrre needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel
AT fagerlandmortenwang needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel
AT holperkristian needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel
AT kesslerpaul needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel
AT sauteraxelrudolf needletiptrackingforultrasoundguidedperipheralnerveblockproceduresanobserverblindedrandomisedcontrolledcrossoverstudyonaphantommodel