Cargando…

Development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid‐related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data

PURPOSE: To facilitate surveillance and evaluate interventions addressing opioid‐related overdoses, algorithms are needed for use in large health care databases to identify and differentiate community‐occurring opioid‐related overdoses from inpatient‐occurring opioid‐related overdose/oversedation. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, Carla A., Hazlehurst, Brian, Brandes, John, Sapp, Daniel S., Janoff, Shannon L., Coplan, Paul M., DeVeaugh‐Geiss, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31095831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.4797
_version_ 1783454905090965504
author Green, Carla A.
Hazlehurst, Brian
Brandes, John
Sapp, Daniel S.
Janoff, Shannon L.
Coplan, Paul M.
DeVeaugh‐Geiss, Angela
author_facet Green, Carla A.
Hazlehurst, Brian
Brandes, John
Sapp, Daniel S.
Janoff, Shannon L.
Coplan, Paul M.
DeVeaugh‐Geiss, Angela
author_sort Green, Carla A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To facilitate surveillance and evaluate interventions addressing opioid‐related overdoses, algorithms are needed for use in large health care databases to identify and differentiate community‐occurring opioid‐related overdoses from inpatient‐occurring opioid‐related overdose/oversedation. METHODS: Data were from Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), a large integrated health plan. We iteratively developed and evaluated an algorithm for electronically identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation in KPNW hospitals from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. Chart audits assessed accuracy; data sources included administrative and clinical records. RESULTS: The best‐performing algorithm used these rules: (1) Include events with opioids administered in an inpatient setting (including emergency department/urgent care) followed by naloxone administration within 275 hours of continuous inpatient stay; (2) exclude events with electroconvulsive therapy procedure codes; and (3) exclude events in which an opioid was administered prior to hospital discharge and followed by readmission with subsequent naloxone administration. Using this algorithm, we identified 870 suspect inpatient overdose/oversedation events and chart audited a random sample of 235. Of the random sample, 185 (78.7%) were deemed overdoses/oversedation, 37 (15.5%) were not, and 13 (5.5%) were possible cases. The number of hours between time of opioid and naloxone administration did not affect algorithm accuracy. When “possible” overdoses/oversedations were included with confirmed events, overall positive predictive value (PPV) was very good (PPV = 84.0%). Additionally, PPV was reasonable when evaluated specifically for hospital stays with emergency/urgent care admissions (PPV = 77.0%) and excellent for elective surgery admissions (PPV = 97.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm performance was reasonable for identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation with best performance among elective surgery patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67673842019-10-03 Development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid‐related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data Green, Carla A. Hazlehurst, Brian Brandes, John Sapp, Daniel S. Janoff, Shannon L. Coplan, Paul M. DeVeaugh‐Geiss, Angela Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Original Reports PURPOSE: To facilitate surveillance and evaluate interventions addressing opioid‐related overdoses, algorithms are needed for use in large health care databases to identify and differentiate community‐occurring opioid‐related overdoses from inpatient‐occurring opioid‐related overdose/oversedation. METHODS: Data were from Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW), a large integrated health plan. We iteratively developed and evaluated an algorithm for electronically identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation in KPNW hospitals from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. Chart audits assessed accuracy; data sources included administrative and clinical records. RESULTS: The best‐performing algorithm used these rules: (1) Include events with opioids administered in an inpatient setting (including emergency department/urgent care) followed by naloxone administration within 275 hours of continuous inpatient stay; (2) exclude events with electroconvulsive therapy procedure codes; and (3) exclude events in which an opioid was administered prior to hospital discharge and followed by readmission with subsequent naloxone administration. Using this algorithm, we identified 870 suspect inpatient overdose/oversedation events and chart audited a random sample of 235. Of the random sample, 185 (78.7%) were deemed overdoses/oversedation, 37 (15.5%) were not, and 13 (5.5%) were possible cases. The number of hours between time of opioid and naloxone administration did not affect algorithm accuracy. When “possible” overdoses/oversedations were included with confirmed events, overall positive predictive value (PPV) was very good (PPV = 84.0%). Additionally, PPV was reasonable when evaluated specifically for hospital stays with emergency/urgent care admissions (PPV = 77.0%) and excellent for elective surgery admissions (PPV = 97.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm performance was reasonable for identifying inpatient overdose/oversedation with best performance among elective surgery patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-16 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6767384/ /pubmed/31095831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.4797 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Reports
Green, Carla A.
Hazlehurst, Brian
Brandes, John
Sapp, Daniel S.
Janoff, Shannon L.
Coplan, Paul M.
DeVeaugh‐Geiss, Angela
Development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid‐related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data
title Development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid‐related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data
title_full Development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid‐related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data
title_fullStr Development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid‐related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data
title_full_unstemmed Development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid‐related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data
title_short Development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid‐related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data
title_sort development of an algorithm to identify inpatient opioid‐related overdoses and oversedation using electronic data
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31095831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.4797
work_keys_str_mv AT greencarlaa developmentofanalgorithmtoidentifyinpatientopioidrelatedoverdosesandoversedationusingelectronicdata
AT hazlehurstbrian developmentofanalgorithmtoidentifyinpatientopioidrelatedoverdosesandoversedationusingelectronicdata
AT brandesjohn developmentofanalgorithmtoidentifyinpatientopioidrelatedoverdosesandoversedationusingelectronicdata
AT sappdaniels developmentofanalgorithmtoidentifyinpatientopioidrelatedoverdosesandoversedationusingelectronicdata
AT janoffshannonl developmentofanalgorithmtoidentifyinpatientopioidrelatedoverdosesandoversedationusingelectronicdata
AT coplanpaulm developmentofanalgorithmtoidentifyinpatientopioidrelatedoverdosesandoversedationusingelectronicdata
AT deveaughgeissangela developmentofanalgorithmtoidentifyinpatientopioidrelatedoverdosesandoversedationusingelectronicdata