Cargando…

Differentiating supraclavicular from gluteal adipose tissue based on simultaneous PDFF and T(2)* mapping using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition

BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue (AT) can be classified into white and brown/beige subtypes. Chemical shift encoding‐based water–fat MRI‐techniques allowing simultaneous mapping of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T(2)* result in a lower PDFF and a shorter T(2)* in brown compared with white AT. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franz, Daniela, Diefenbach, Maximilian N., Treibel, Franziska, Weidlich, Dominik, Syväri, Jan, Ruschke, Stefan, Wu, Mingming, Holzapfel, Christina, Drabsch, Theresa, Baum, Thomas, Eggers, Holger, Rummeny, Ernst J., Hauner, Hans, Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30684282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26661
_version_ 1783454907006713856
author Franz, Daniela
Diefenbach, Maximilian N.
Treibel, Franziska
Weidlich, Dominik
Syväri, Jan
Ruschke, Stefan
Wu, Mingming
Holzapfel, Christina
Drabsch, Theresa
Baum, Thomas
Eggers, Holger
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Hauner, Hans
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
author_facet Franz, Daniela
Diefenbach, Maximilian N.
Treibel, Franziska
Weidlich, Dominik
Syväri, Jan
Ruschke, Stefan
Wu, Mingming
Holzapfel, Christina
Drabsch, Theresa
Baum, Thomas
Eggers, Holger
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Hauner, Hans
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
author_sort Franz, Daniela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue (AT) can be classified into white and brown/beige subtypes. Chemical shift encoding‐based water–fat MRI‐techniques allowing simultaneous mapping of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T(2)* result in a lower PDFF and a shorter T(2)* in brown compared with white AT. However, AT T(2)* values vary widely in the literature and are primarily based on 6‐echo data. Increasing the number of echoes in a multiecho gradient‐echo acquisition is expected to increase the precision of AT T(2)* mapping. PURPOSE: 1) To mitigate issues of current T(2)*‐measurement techniques through experimental design, and 2) to investigate gluteal and supraclavicular AT T(2)* and PDFF and their relationship using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Twenty‐one healthy subjects. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE ASSESSMENT: First, a ground truth signal evolution was simulated from a single‐T(2)* water–fat model. Second, a time‐interleaved 20‐echo gradient‐echo sequence with monopolar gradients of neck and abdomen/pelvis at 3 T was performed in vivo to determine supraclavicular and gluteal PDFF and T(2)*. Complex‐based water–fat separation was performed for the first 6 echoes and the full 20 echoes. AT depots were segmented. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann‐Whitney test, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Both PDFF and T(2)* differed significantly between supraclavicular and gluteal AT with 6 and 20 echoes (PDFF: P < 0.0001 each, T(2)*: P = 0.03 / P < 0.0001 for 6/20 echoes). 6‐echo T(2)* demonstrated higher standard deviations and broader ranges than 20‐echo T(2)*. Regression analyses revealed a strong relationship between PDFF and T(2)* values per AT compartment (R(2) = 0.63 supraclavicular, R(2) = 0.86 gluteal, P < 0.0001 each). DATA CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that an increase in the number of sampled echoes beyond 6 does not affect AT PDFF quantification, whereas AT T(2)* is considerably affected. Thus, a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition enables a multiparametric analysis of both AT PDFF and T(2)* and may therefore improve MR‐based differentiation between white and brown fat. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:424–434.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67673922019-10-03 Differentiating supraclavicular from gluteal adipose tissue based on simultaneous PDFF and T(2)* mapping using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition Franz, Daniela Diefenbach, Maximilian N. Treibel, Franziska Weidlich, Dominik Syväri, Jan Ruschke, Stefan Wu, Mingming Holzapfel, Christina Drabsch, Theresa Baum, Thomas Eggers, Holger Rummeny, Ernst J. Hauner, Hans Karampinos, Dimitrios C. J Magn Reson Imaging Original Research BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue (AT) can be classified into white and brown/beige subtypes. Chemical shift encoding‐based water–fat MRI‐techniques allowing simultaneous mapping of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T(2)* result in a lower PDFF and a shorter T(2)* in brown compared with white AT. However, AT T(2)* values vary widely in the literature and are primarily based on 6‐echo data. Increasing the number of echoes in a multiecho gradient‐echo acquisition is expected to increase the precision of AT T(2)* mapping. PURPOSE: 1) To mitigate issues of current T(2)*‐measurement techniques through experimental design, and 2) to investigate gluteal and supraclavicular AT T(2)* and PDFF and their relationship using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Twenty‐one healthy subjects. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE ASSESSMENT: First, a ground truth signal evolution was simulated from a single‐T(2)* water–fat model. Second, a time‐interleaved 20‐echo gradient‐echo sequence with monopolar gradients of neck and abdomen/pelvis at 3 T was performed in vivo to determine supraclavicular and gluteal PDFF and T(2)*. Complex‐based water–fat separation was performed for the first 6 echoes and the full 20 echoes. AT depots were segmented. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann‐Whitney test, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Both PDFF and T(2)* differed significantly between supraclavicular and gluteal AT with 6 and 20 echoes (PDFF: P < 0.0001 each, T(2)*: P = 0.03 / P < 0.0001 for 6/20 echoes). 6‐echo T(2)* demonstrated higher standard deviations and broader ranges than 20‐echo T(2)*. Regression analyses revealed a strong relationship between PDFF and T(2)* values per AT compartment (R(2) = 0.63 supraclavicular, R(2) = 0.86 gluteal, P < 0.0001 each). DATA CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that an increase in the number of sampled echoes beyond 6 does not affect AT PDFF quantification, whereas AT T(2)* is considerably affected. Thus, a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition enables a multiparametric analysis of both AT PDFF and T(2)* and may therefore improve MR‐based differentiation between white and brown fat. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:424–434. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-01-25 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6767392/ /pubmed/30684282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26661 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Franz, Daniela
Diefenbach, Maximilian N.
Treibel, Franziska
Weidlich, Dominik
Syväri, Jan
Ruschke, Stefan
Wu, Mingming
Holzapfel, Christina
Drabsch, Theresa
Baum, Thomas
Eggers, Holger
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Hauner, Hans
Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
Differentiating supraclavicular from gluteal adipose tissue based on simultaneous PDFF and T(2)* mapping using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition
title Differentiating supraclavicular from gluteal adipose tissue based on simultaneous PDFF and T(2)* mapping using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition
title_full Differentiating supraclavicular from gluteal adipose tissue based on simultaneous PDFF and T(2)* mapping using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition
title_fullStr Differentiating supraclavicular from gluteal adipose tissue based on simultaneous PDFF and T(2)* mapping using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating supraclavicular from gluteal adipose tissue based on simultaneous PDFF and T(2)* mapping using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition
title_short Differentiating supraclavicular from gluteal adipose tissue based on simultaneous PDFF and T(2)* mapping using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition
title_sort differentiating supraclavicular from gluteal adipose tissue based on simultaneous pdff and t(2)* mapping using a 20‐echo gradient‐echo acquisition
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30684282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26661
work_keys_str_mv AT franzdaniela differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT diefenbachmaximiliann differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT treibelfranziska differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT weidlichdominik differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT syvarijan differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT ruschkestefan differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT wumingming differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT holzapfelchristina differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT drabschtheresa differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT baumthomas differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT eggersholger differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT rummenyernstj differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT haunerhans differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition
AT karampinosdimitriosc differentiatingsupraclavicularfromglutealadiposetissuebasedonsimultaneouspdffandt2mappingusinga20echogradientechoacquisition