Cargando…

The neuroplastic effect of olfactory training to the recovery of olfactory system in mouse model

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported the benefits of olfactory training (OT) in the olfactory nervous system of mouse models. Therefore, in this study we performed next‐generation sequencing to evaluate the effects of OT on mRNA sequencing in the olfactory area. METHODS: Mice in each group were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Boo‐Young, Park, Ju Yeon, Kim, Eui Jin, Kim, Byung Guk, Kim, Sung Won, Kim, Soo Whan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30793525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22320
_version_ 1783454911743131648
author Kim, Boo‐Young
Park, Ju Yeon
Kim, Eui Jin
Kim, Byung Guk
Kim, Sung Won
Kim, Soo Whan
author_facet Kim, Boo‐Young
Park, Ju Yeon
Kim, Eui Jin
Kim, Byung Guk
Kim, Sung Won
Kim, Soo Whan
author_sort Kim, Boo‐Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported the benefits of olfactory training (OT) in the olfactory nervous system of mouse models. Therefore, in this study we performed next‐generation sequencing to evaluate the effects of OT on mRNA sequencing in the olfactory area. METHODS: Mice in each group were administered 300 mg of 3‐methylindole per kilogram of mouse weight. The olfactory function was evaluated by a food‐finding test once a week. The olfactory neuroepithelium was harvested for histologic examination and protein analysis. Subsequently, data analysis, gene ontology and pathway analysis, quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction of mRNA, and Western blot analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Mice were divided into 4 groups according to treatment. Control, anosmia, training, and steroid group mice resumed food finding. Olfactory Maker Protein, olfr1507, ADCY3, and GNAL mRNA expression was higher in the olfactory neuroepithelium of OT than anosmia group mice. In total, 26,364 mRNAs were analyzed. Comparison of the results of OT vs anosmia revealed that ADCY8,10, GFAP, NGF, NGFR, GFAP, and BDNF mRNAs were upregulated in the gene ontology. CONCLUSION: OT improved olfactory function, as indicated by the food‐finding test. OT improved the olfactory recovery time to stimulate olfactory nerve regeneration. OT may initially stimulate the olfactory receptor, followed by neurogenesis. Steroid therapy and OT operated under completely different mechanisms in the upregulated gene study. These results indicate that OT may be one of the future modalities for treating olfactory impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67674122019-10-03 The neuroplastic effect of olfactory training to the recovery of olfactory system in mouse model Kim, Boo‐Young Park, Ju Yeon Kim, Eui Jin Kim, Byung Guk Kim, Sung Won Kim, Soo Whan Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported the benefits of olfactory training (OT) in the olfactory nervous system of mouse models. Therefore, in this study we performed next‐generation sequencing to evaluate the effects of OT on mRNA sequencing in the olfactory area. METHODS: Mice in each group were administered 300 mg of 3‐methylindole per kilogram of mouse weight. The olfactory function was evaluated by a food‐finding test once a week. The olfactory neuroepithelium was harvested for histologic examination and protein analysis. Subsequently, data analysis, gene ontology and pathway analysis, quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction of mRNA, and Western blot analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Mice were divided into 4 groups according to treatment. Control, anosmia, training, and steroid group mice resumed food finding. Olfactory Maker Protein, olfr1507, ADCY3, and GNAL mRNA expression was higher in the olfactory neuroepithelium of OT than anosmia group mice. In total, 26,364 mRNAs were analyzed. Comparison of the results of OT vs anosmia revealed that ADCY8,10, GFAP, NGF, NGFR, GFAP, and BDNF mRNAs were upregulated in the gene ontology. CONCLUSION: OT improved olfactory function, as indicated by the food‐finding test. OT improved the olfactory recovery time to stimulate olfactory nerve regeneration. OT may initially stimulate the olfactory receptor, followed by neurogenesis. Steroid therapy and OT operated under completely different mechanisms in the upregulated gene study. These results indicate that OT may be one of the future modalities for treating olfactory impairment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-21 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6767412/ /pubmed/30793525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22320 Text en © 2019 The Authors. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology published by ARS‐AAOA, LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kim, Boo‐Young
Park, Ju Yeon
Kim, Eui Jin
Kim, Byung Guk
Kim, Sung Won
Kim, Soo Whan
The neuroplastic effect of olfactory training to the recovery of olfactory system in mouse model
title The neuroplastic effect of olfactory training to the recovery of olfactory system in mouse model
title_full The neuroplastic effect of olfactory training to the recovery of olfactory system in mouse model
title_fullStr The neuroplastic effect of olfactory training to the recovery of olfactory system in mouse model
title_full_unstemmed The neuroplastic effect of olfactory training to the recovery of olfactory system in mouse model
title_short The neuroplastic effect of olfactory training to the recovery of olfactory system in mouse model
title_sort neuroplastic effect of olfactory training to the recovery of olfactory system in mouse model
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30793525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22320
work_keys_str_mv AT kimbooyoung theneuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT parkjuyeon theneuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT kimeuijin theneuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT kimbyungguk theneuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT kimsungwon theneuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT kimsoowhan theneuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT kimbooyoung neuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT parkjuyeon neuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT kimeuijin neuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT kimbyungguk neuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT kimsungwon neuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel
AT kimsoowhan neuroplasticeffectofolfactorytrainingtotherecoveryofolfactorysysteminmousemodel