Cargando…
Contrast‐enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening
Multiple studies in the first decade of the 21(st) century have established contrast‐enhanced breast MRI as a screening modality for women with a hereditary or familial increased risk for the development of breast cancer. In recent studies, in women with various risk profiles, the sensitivity ranges...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30659696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26654 |
_version_ | 1783454917865766912 |
---|---|
author | Mann, Ritse M. Kuhl, Christiane K. Moy, Linda |
author_facet | Mann, Ritse M. Kuhl, Christiane K. Moy, Linda |
author_sort | Mann, Ritse M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple studies in the first decade of the 21(st) century have established contrast‐enhanced breast MRI as a screening modality for women with a hereditary or familial increased risk for the development of breast cancer. In recent studies, in women with various risk profiles, the sensitivity ranges between 81% and 100%, which is approximately twice as high as the sensitivity of mammography. The specificity increases in follow‐up rounds to around 97%, with positive predictive values for biopsy in the same range as for mammography. MRI preferentially detects the more aggressive/invasive types of breast cancer, but has a higher sensitivity than mammography for any type of cancer. This performance implies that in women screened with breast MRI, all other examinations must be regarded as supplemental. Mammography may yield ~5% additional cancers, mostly ductal carcinoma in situ, while slightly decreasing specificity and increasing the costs. Ultrasound has no supplemental value when MRI is used. Evidence is mounting that in other groups of women the performance of MRI is likewise superior to more conventional screening techniques. Particularly in women with a personal history of breast cancer, the gain seems to be high, but also in women with a biopsy history of lobular carcinoma in situ and even women at average risk, similar results are reported. Initial outcome studies show that breast MRI detects cancer earlier, which induces a stage‐shift increasing the survival benefit of screening. Cost‐effectiveness is still an issue, particularly for women at lower risk. Since costs of the MRI scan itself are a driving factor, efforts to reduce these costs are essential. The use of abbreviated MRI protocols may enable more widespread use of breast MRI for screening. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:377–390. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6767440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67674402019-10-03 Contrast‐enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening Mann, Ritse M. Kuhl, Christiane K. Moy, Linda J Magn Reson Imaging Review Articles Multiple studies in the first decade of the 21(st) century have established contrast‐enhanced breast MRI as a screening modality for women with a hereditary or familial increased risk for the development of breast cancer. In recent studies, in women with various risk profiles, the sensitivity ranges between 81% and 100%, which is approximately twice as high as the sensitivity of mammography. The specificity increases in follow‐up rounds to around 97%, with positive predictive values for biopsy in the same range as for mammography. MRI preferentially detects the more aggressive/invasive types of breast cancer, but has a higher sensitivity than mammography for any type of cancer. This performance implies that in women screened with breast MRI, all other examinations must be regarded as supplemental. Mammography may yield ~5% additional cancers, mostly ductal carcinoma in situ, while slightly decreasing specificity and increasing the costs. Ultrasound has no supplemental value when MRI is used. Evidence is mounting that in other groups of women the performance of MRI is likewise superior to more conventional screening techniques. Particularly in women with a personal history of breast cancer, the gain seems to be high, but also in women with a biopsy history of lobular carcinoma in situ and even women at average risk, similar results are reported. Initial outcome studies show that breast MRI detects cancer earlier, which induces a stage‐shift increasing the survival benefit of screening. Cost‐effectiveness is still an issue, particularly for women at lower risk. Since costs of the MRI scan itself are a driving factor, efforts to reduce these costs are essential. The use of abbreviated MRI protocols may enable more widespread use of breast MRI for screening. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:377–390. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-01-18 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6767440/ /pubmed/30659696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26654 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Mann, Ritse M. Kuhl, Christiane K. Moy, Linda Contrast‐enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening |
title | Contrast‐enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening |
title_full | Contrast‐enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening |
title_fullStr | Contrast‐enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrast‐enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening |
title_short | Contrast‐enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening |
title_sort | contrast‐enhanced mri for breast cancer screening |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30659696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26654 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mannritsem contrastenhancedmriforbreastcancerscreening AT kuhlchristianek contrastenhancedmriforbreastcancerscreening AT moylinda contrastenhancedmriforbreastcancerscreening |