Cargando…

Hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are generally depolarized in α‐helices as revealed by a molecular tailoring approach

Hydrogen‐bond (H‐bond) interaction energies in α‐helices of short alanine peptides were systematically examined by precise density functional theory calculations, followed by a molecular tailoring approach. The contribution of each H‐bond interaction in α‐helices was estimated in detail from the ent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kondo, Hiroko X., Kusaka, Ayumi, Kitakawa, Colin K., Onari, Jinta, Yamanaka, Shusuke, Nakamura, Haruki, Takano, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31099907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.25859
_version_ 1783454934520299520
author Kondo, Hiroko X.
Kusaka, Ayumi
Kitakawa, Colin K.
Onari, Jinta
Yamanaka, Shusuke
Nakamura, Haruki
Takano, Yu
author_facet Kondo, Hiroko X.
Kusaka, Ayumi
Kitakawa, Colin K.
Onari, Jinta
Yamanaka, Shusuke
Nakamura, Haruki
Takano, Yu
author_sort Kondo, Hiroko X.
collection PubMed
description Hydrogen‐bond (H‐bond) interaction energies in α‐helices of short alanine peptides were systematically examined by precise density functional theory calculations, followed by a molecular tailoring approach. The contribution of each H‐bond interaction in α‐helices was estimated in detail from the entire conformation energies, and the results were compared with those in the minimal H‐bond models, in which only H‐bond donors and acceptors exist with the capping methyl groups. The former interaction energies were always significantly weaker than the latter energies, when the same geometries of the H‐bond donors and acceptors were applied. The chemical origin of this phenomenon was investigated by analyzing the differences among the electronic structures of the local peptide backbones of the α‐helices and those of the minimal H‐bond models. Consequently, we found that the reduced H‐bond energy originated from the depolarizations of both the H‐bond donor and acceptor groups, due to the repulsive interactions with the neighboring polar peptide groups in the α‐helix backbone. The classical force fields provide similar H‐bond energies to those in the minimal H‐bond models, which ignore the current depolarization effect, and thus they overestimate the actual H‐bond energies in α‐helices. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67675082019-10-03 Hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are generally depolarized in α‐helices as revealed by a molecular tailoring approach Kondo, Hiroko X. Kusaka, Ayumi Kitakawa, Colin K. Onari, Jinta Yamanaka, Shusuke Nakamura, Haruki Takano, Yu J Comput Chem Full Papers Hydrogen‐bond (H‐bond) interaction energies in α‐helices of short alanine peptides were systematically examined by precise density functional theory calculations, followed by a molecular tailoring approach. The contribution of each H‐bond interaction in α‐helices was estimated in detail from the entire conformation energies, and the results were compared with those in the minimal H‐bond models, in which only H‐bond donors and acceptors exist with the capping methyl groups. The former interaction energies were always significantly weaker than the latter energies, when the same geometries of the H‐bond donors and acceptors were applied. The chemical origin of this phenomenon was investigated by analyzing the differences among the electronic structures of the local peptide backbones of the α‐helices and those of the minimal H‐bond models. Consequently, we found that the reduced H‐bond energy originated from the depolarizations of both the H‐bond donor and acceptor groups, due to the repulsive interactions with the neighboring polar peptide groups in the α‐helix backbone. The classical force fields provide similar H‐bond energies to those in the minimal H‐bond models, which ignore the current depolarization effect, and thus they overestimate the actual H‐bond energies in α‐helices. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-05-17 2019-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6767508/ /pubmed/31099907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.25859 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Kondo, Hiroko X.
Kusaka, Ayumi
Kitakawa, Colin K.
Onari, Jinta
Yamanaka, Shusuke
Nakamura, Haruki
Takano, Yu
Hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are generally depolarized in α‐helices as revealed by a molecular tailoring approach
title Hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are generally depolarized in α‐helices as revealed by a molecular tailoring approach
title_full Hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are generally depolarized in α‐helices as revealed by a molecular tailoring approach
title_fullStr Hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are generally depolarized in α‐helices as revealed by a molecular tailoring approach
title_full_unstemmed Hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are generally depolarized in α‐helices as revealed by a molecular tailoring approach
title_short Hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are generally depolarized in α‐helices as revealed by a molecular tailoring approach
title_sort hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are generally depolarized in α‐helices as revealed by a molecular tailoring approach
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31099907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.25859
work_keys_str_mv AT kondohirokox hydrogenbonddonorsandacceptorsaregenerallydepolarizedinahelicesasrevealedbyamoleculartailoringapproach
AT kusakaayumi hydrogenbonddonorsandacceptorsaregenerallydepolarizedinahelicesasrevealedbyamoleculartailoringapproach
AT kitakawacolink hydrogenbonddonorsandacceptorsaregenerallydepolarizedinahelicesasrevealedbyamoleculartailoringapproach
AT onarijinta hydrogenbonddonorsandacceptorsaregenerallydepolarizedinahelicesasrevealedbyamoleculartailoringapproach
AT yamanakashusuke hydrogenbonddonorsandacceptorsaregenerallydepolarizedinahelicesasrevealedbyamoleculartailoringapproach
AT nakamuraharuki hydrogenbonddonorsandacceptorsaregenerallydepolarizedinahelicesasrevealedbyamoleculartailoringapproach
AT takanoyu hydrogenbonddonorsandacceptorsaregenerallydepolarizedinahelicesasrevealedbyamoleculartailoringapproach