Cargando…
The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children
The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been implicated in several auditory processes. The putative role of the MOCR in improving speech perception in noise is particularly relevant for children who complain of listening difficulties (LiD). The hypothesis that the MOCR may be impaired in individu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519870942 |
_version_ | 1783454982472728576 |
---|---|
author | Boothalingam, Sriram Allan, Chris Allen, Prudence Purcell, David W. |
author_facet | Boothalingam, Sriram Allan, Chris Allen, Prudence Purcell, David W. |
author_sort | Boothalingam, Sriram |
collection | PubMed |
description | The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been implicated in several auditory processes. The putative role of the MOCR in improving speech perception in noise is particularly relevant for children who complain of listening difficulties (LiD). The hypothesis that the MOCR may be impaired in individuals with LiD or auditory processing disorder has led to several investigations but without consensus. In two related studies, we compared the MOCR functioning of children with LiD and typically developing (TD) children in the same age range (7–17 years). In Study 1, we investigated ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral MOCR using forward-masked click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs; n = 17 TD, 17 LiD). In Study 2, we employed three OAE types: CEOAEs (n = 16 TD, 21 LiD), stimulus frequency OAEs (n = 21 TD, 30 LiD), and distortion product OAEs (n = 17 TD, 22 LiD) in a contralateral noise paradigm. Results from both studies suggest that the MOCR functioning is not significantly different between the two groups. Some likely reasons for differences in findings among published studies could stem from the lack of strict data quality measures (e.g., high signal-to-noise ratio, control for the middle ear muscle reflex) that were enforced in the present study. The inherent variability of the MOCR, the subpar reliability of current MOCR methods, and the heterogeneity in auditory processing deficits that underlie auditory processing disorder make detecting clinically relevant differences in MOCR function impractical using current methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6767729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67677292019-10-18 The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children Boothalingam, Sriram Allan, Chris Allen, Prudence Purcell, David W. Trends Hear Original Article The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been implicated in several auditory processes. The putative role of the MOCR in improving speech perception in noise is particularly relevant for children who complain of listening difficulties (LiD). The hypothesis that the MOCR may be impaired in individuals with LiD or auditory processing disorder has led to several investigations but without consensus. In two related studies, we compared the MOCR functioning of children with LiD and typically developing (TD) children in the same age range (7–17 years). In Study 1, we investigated ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral MOCR using forward-masked click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs; n = 17 TD, 17 LiD). In Study 2, we employed three OAE types: CEOAEs (n = 16 TD, 21 LiD), stimulus frequency OAEs (n = 21 TD, 30 LiD), and distortion product OAEs (n = 17 TD, 22 LiD) in a contralateral noise paradigm. Results from both studies suggest that the MOCR functioning is not significantly different between the two groups. Some likely reasons for differences in findings among published studies could stem from the lack of strict data quality measures (e.g., high signal-to-noise ratio, control for the middle ear muscle reflex) that were enforced in the present study. The inherent variability of the MOCR, the subpar reliability of current MOCR methods, and the heterogeneity in auditory processing deficits that underlie auditory processing disorder make detecting clinically relevant differences in MOCR function impractical using current methods. SAGE Publications 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6767729/ /pubmed/31558110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519870942 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Boothalingam, Sriram Allan, Chris Allen, Prudence Purcell, David W. The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children |
title | The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in
Listening Difficulties in Children |
title_full | The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in
Listening Difficulties in Children |
title_fullStr | The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in
Listening Difficulties in Children |
title_full_unstemmed | The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in
Listening Difficulties in Children |
title_short | The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in
Listening Difficulties in Children |
title_sort | medial olivocochlear reflex is unlikely to play a role in
listening difficulties in children |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519870942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boothalingamsriram themedialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren AT allanchris themedialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren AT allenprudence themedialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren AT purcelldavidw themedialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren AT boothalingamsriram medialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren AT allanchris medialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren AT allenprudence medialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren AT purcelldavidw medialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren |