Cargando…

The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children

The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been implicated in several auditory processes. The putative role of the MOCR in improving speech perception in noise is particularly relevant for children who complain of listening difficulties (LiD). The hypothesis that the MOCR may be impaired in individu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boothalingam, Sriram, Allan, Chris, Allen, Prudence, Purcell, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519870942
_version_ 1783454982472728576
author Boothalingam, Sriram
Allan, Chris
Allen, Prudence
Purcell, David W.
author_facet Boothalingam, Sriram
Allan, Chris
Allen, Prudence
Purcell, David W.
author_sort Boothalingam, Sriram
collection PubMed
description The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been implicated in several auditory processes. The putative role of the MOCR in improving speech perception in noise is particularly relevant for children who complain of listening difficulties (LiD). The hypothesis that the MOCR may be impaired in individuals with LiD or auditory processing disorder has led to several investigations but without consensus. In two related studies, we compared the MOCR functioning of children with LiD and typically developing (TD) children in the same age range (7–17 years). In Study 1, we investigated ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral MOCR using forward-masked click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs; n = 17 TD, 17 LiD). In Study 2, we employed three OAE types: CEOAEs (n = 16 TD, 21 LiD), stimulus frequency OAEs (n = 21 TD, 30 LiD), and distortion product OAEs (n = 17 TD, 22 LiD) in a contralateral noise paradigm. Results from both studies suggest that the MOCR functioning is not significantly different between the two groups. Some likely reasons for differences in findings among published studies could stem from the lack of strict data quality measures (e.g., high signal-to-noise ratio, control for the middle ear muscle reflex) that were enforced in the present study. The inherent variability of the MOCR, the subpar reliability of current MOCR methods, and the heterogeneity in auditory processing deficits that underlie auditory processing disorder make detecting clinically relevant differences in MOCR function impractical using current methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67677292019-10-18 The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children Boothalingam, Sriram Allan, Chris Allen, Prudence Purcell, David W. Trends Hear Original Article The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been implicated in several auditory processes. The putative role of the MOCR in improving speech perception in noise is particularly relevant for children who complain of listening difficulties (LiD). The hypothesis that the MOCR may be impaired in individuals with LiD or auditory processing disorder has led to several investigations but without consensus. In two related studies, we compared the MOCR functioning of children with LiD and typically developing (TD) children in the same age range (7–17 years). In Study 1, we investigated ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral MOCR using forward-masked click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs; n = 17 TD, 17 LiD). In Study 2, we employed three OAE types: CEOAEs (n = 16 TD, 21 LiD), stimulus frequency OAEs (n = 21 TD, 30 LiD), and distortion product OAEs (n = 17 TD, 22 LiD) in a contralateral noise paradigm. Results from both studies suggest that the MOCR functioning is not significantly different between the two groups. Some likely reasons for differences in findings among published studies could stem from the lack of strict data quality measures (e.g., high signal-to-noise ratio, control for the middle ear muscle reflex) that were enforced in the present study. The inherent variability of the MOCR, the subpar reliability of current MOCR methods, and the heterogeneity in auditory processing deficits that underlie auditory processing disorder make detecting clinically relevant differences in MOCR function impractical using current methods. SAGE Publications 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6767729/ /pubmed/31558110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519870942 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Boothalingam, Sriram
Allan, Chris
Allen, Prudence
Purcell, David W.
The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children
title The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children
title_full The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children
title_fullStr The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children
title_full_unstemmed The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children
title_short The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children
title_sort medial olivocochlear reflex is unlikely to play a role in listening difficulties in children
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558110
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519870942
work_keys_str_mv AT boothalingamsriram themedialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren
AT allanchris themedialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren
AT allenprudence themedialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren
AT purcelldavidw themedialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren
AT boothalingamsriram medialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren
AT allanchris medialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren
AT allenprudence medialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren
AT purcelldavidw medialolivocochlearreflexisunlikelytoplayaroleinlisteningdifficultiesinchildren