Cargando…

Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning

White blood cell (WBC) differential counting is an established clinical routine to assess patient immune system status. Fluorescent markers and a flow cytometer are required for the current state‐of‐the‐art method for determining WBC differential counts. However, this process requires several sample...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nassar, Mariam, Doan, Minh, Filby, Andrew, Wolkenhauer, Olaf, Fogg, Darin K., Piasecka, Justyna, Thornton, Catherine A., Carpenter, Anne E., Summers, Huw D., Rees, Paul, Hennig, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31081599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23794
_version_ 1783454984889696256
author Nassar, Mariam
Doan, Minh
Filby, Andrew
Wolkenhauer, Olaf
Fogg, Darin K.
Piasecka, Justyna
Thornton, Catherine A.
Carpenter, Anne E.
Summers, Huw D.
Rees, Paul
Hennig, Holger
author_facet Nassar, Mariam
Doan, Minh
Filby, Andrew
Wolkenhauer, Olaf
Fogg, Darin K.
Piasecka, Justyna
Thornton, Catherine A.
Carpenter, Anne E.
Summers, Huw D.
Rees, Paul
Hennig, Holger
author_sort Nassar, Mariam
collection PubMed
description White blood cell (WBC) differential counting is an established clinical routine to assess patient immune system status. Fluorescent markers and a flow cytometer are required for the current state‐of‐the‐art method for determining WBC differential counts. However, this process requires several sample preparation steps and may adversely disturb the cells. We present a novel label‐free approach using an imaging flow cytometer and machine learning algorithms, where live, unstained WBCs were classified. It achieved an average F1‐score of 97% and two subtypes of WBCs, B and T lymphocytes, were distinguished from each other with an average F1‐score of 78%, a task previously considered impossible for unlabeled samples. We provide an open‐source workflow to carry out the procedure. We validated the WBC analysis with unstained samples from 85 donors. The presented method enables robust and highly accurate identification of WBCs, minimizing the disturbance to the cells and leaving marker channels free to answer other biological questions. It also opens the door to employing machine learning for liquid biopsy, here, using the rich information in cell morphology for a wide range of diagnostics of primary blood. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67677402019-10-03 Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning Nassar, Mariam Doan, Minh Filby, Andrew Wolkenhauer, Olaf Fogg, Darin K. Piasecka, Justyna Thornton, Catherine A. Carpenter, Anne E. Summers, Huw D. Rees, Paul Hennig, Holger Cytometry A Original Articles White blood cell (WBC) differential counting is an established clinical routine to assess patient immune system status. Fluorescent markers and a flow cytometer are required for the current state‐of‐the‐art method for determining WBC differential counts. However, this process requires several sample preparation steps and may adversely disturb the cells. We present a novel label‐free approach using an imaging flow cytometer and machine learning algorithms, where live, unstained WBCs were classified. It achieved an average F1‐score of 97% and two subtypes of WBCs, B and T lymphocytes, were distinguished from each other with an average F1‐score of 78%, a task previously considered impossible for unlabeled samples. We provide an open‐source workflow to carry out the procedure. We validated the WBC analysis with unstained samples from 85 donors. The presented method enables robust and highly accurate identification of WBCs, minimizing the disturbance to the cells and leaving marker channels free to answer other biological questions. It also opens the door to employing machine learning for liquid biopsy, here, using the rich information in cell morphology for a wide range of diagnostics of primary blood. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-05-13 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6767740/ /pubmed/31081599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23794 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nassar, Mariam
Doan, Minh
Filby, Andrew
Wolkenhauer, Olaf
Fogg, Darin K.
Piasecka, Justyna
Thornton, Catherine A.
Carpenter, Anne E.
Summers, Huw D.
Rees, Paul
Hennig, Holger
Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning
title Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning
title_full Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning
title_fullStr Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning
title_short Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning
title_sort label‐free identification of white blood cells using machine learning
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31081599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23794
work_keys_str_mv AT nassarmariam labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT doanminh labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT filbyandrew labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT wolkenhauerolaf labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT foggdarink labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT piaseckajustyna labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT thorntoncatherinea labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT carpenterannee labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT summershuwd labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT reespaul labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning
AT hennigholger labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning