Cargando…
Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning
White blood cell (WBC) differential counting is an established clinical routine to assess patient immune system status. Fluorescent markers and a flow cytometer are required for the current state‐of‐the‐art method for determining WBC differential counts. However, this process requires several sample...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31081599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23794 |
_version_ | 1783454984889696256 |
---|---|
author | Nassar, Mariam Doan, Minh Filby, Andrew Wolkenhauer, Olaf Fogg, Darin K. Piasecka, Justyna Thornton, Catherine A. Carpenter, Anne E. Summers, Huw D. Rees, Paul Hennig, Holger |
author_facet | Nassar, Mariam Doan, Minh Filby, Andrew Wolkenhauer, Olaf Fogg, Darin K. Piasecka, Justyna Thornton, Catherine A. Carpenter, Anne E. Summers, Huw D. Rees, Paul Hennig, Holger |
author_sort | Nassar, Mariam |
collection | PubMed |
description | White blood cell (WBC) differential counting is an established clinical routine to assess patient immune system status. Fluorescent markers and a flow cytometer are required for the current state‐of‐the‐art method for determining WBC differential counts. However, this process requires several sample preparation steps and may adversely disturb the cells. We present a novel label‐free approach using an imaging flow cytometer and machine learning algorithms, where live, unstained WBCs were classified. It achieved an average F1‐score of 97% and two subtypes of WBCs, B and T lymphocytes, were distinguished from each other with an average F1‐score of 78%, a task previously considered impossible for unlabeled samples. We provide an open‐source workflow to carry out the procedure. We validated the WBC analysis with unstained samples from 85 donors. The presented method enables robust and highly accurate identification of WBCs, minimizing the disturbance to the cells and leaving marker channels free to answer other biological questions. It also opens the door to employing machine learning for liquid biopsy, here, using the rich information in cell morphology for a wide range of diagnostics of primary blood. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6767740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67677402019-10-03 Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning Nassar, Mariam Doan, Minh Filby, Andrew Wolkenhauer, Olaf Fogg, Darin K. Piasecka, Justyna Thornton, Catherine A. Carpenter, Anne E. Summers, Huw D. Rees, Paul Hennig, Holger Cytometry A Original Articles White blood cell (WBC) differential counting is an established clinical routine to assess patient immune system status. Fluorescent markers and a flow cytometer are required for the current state‐of‐the‐art method for determining WBC differential counts. However, this process requires several sample preparation steps and may adversely disturb the cells. We present a novel label‐free approach using an imaging flow cytometer and machine learning algorithms, where live, unstained WBCs were classified. It achieved an average F1‐score of 97% and two subtypes of WBCs, B and T lymphocytes, were distinguished from each other with an average F1‐score of 78%, a task previously considered impossible for unlabeled samples. We provide an open‐source workflow to carry out the procedure. We validated the WBC analysis with unstained samples from 85 donors. The presented method enables robust and highly accurate identification of WBCs, minimizing the disturbance to the cells and leaving marker channels free to answer other biological questions. It also opens the door to employing machine learning for liquid biopsy, here, using the rich information in cell morphology for a wide range of diagnostics of primary blood. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-05-13 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6767740/ /pubmed/31081599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23794 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Nassar, Mariam Doan, Minh Filby, Andrew Wolkenhauer, Olaf Fogg, Darin K. Piasecka, Justyna Thornton, Catherine A. Carpenter, Anne E. Summers, Huw D. Rees, Paul Hennig, Holger Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning |
title | Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning |
title_full | Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning |
title_short | Label‐Free Identification of White Blood Cells Using Machine Learning |
title_sort | label‐free identification of white blood cells using machine learning |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31081599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nassarmariam labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT doanminh labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT filbyandrew labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT wolkenhauerolaf labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT foggdarink labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT piaseckajustyna labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT thorntoncatherinea labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT carpenterannee labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT summershuwd labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT reespaul labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning AT hennigholger labelfreeidentificationofwhitebloodcellsusingmachinelearning |