Cargando…

Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators

BACKGROUND: Development and uptake of digital health technologies benefit from cross-sectoral efforts from academia and industry. Our study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators associated with academia–industry collaborations in digital health in middle- and high-income countries. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chelsea, Shao, Shuai, Liu, Chang, Bennett, Gary G., Prvu Bettger, Janet, Yan, Lijing L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207619878627
_version_ 1783454985363652608
author Liu, Chelsea
Shao, Shuai
Liu, Chang
Bennett, Gary G.
Prvu Bettger, Janet
Yan, Lijing L
author_facet Liu, Chelsea
Shao, Shuai
Liu, Chang
Bennett, Gary G.
Prvu Bettger, Janet
Yan, Lijing L
author_sort Liu, Chelsea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Development and uptake of digital health technologies benefit from cross-sectoral efforts from academia and industry. Our study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators associated with academia–industry collaborations in digital health in middle- and high-income countries. METHODS: Trained personnel conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 stakeholders who were active in industry, academia or both. Stakeholders were based in middle-income countries (including China) and high-income countries (including the United States) as defined by the World Bank. Interviews were conducted in the stakeholder’s language of choice (Chinese, n = 12; English, n = 11). Qualitative interview questions elicited perspectives on stakeholders’ experience with academia–industry collaboration, challenges faced, and factors that facilitated the process. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, thematically coded by bilingual coders and analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Stakeholders in both academia and industry identified complementary roles, authentic communication between partners, and clearly outlined goals or expectations prior to the collaboration as primary facilitators for success. Misaligned goals or expectations, differences in timelines for productivity and difficulties balancing expectations for business outcomes versus generation of scientific evidence were identified as primary barriers. Stakeholders in high-income countries reported inauthentic communication as a significant barrier to collaboration, whereas those in middle-income countries did not. CONCLUSION: Outlining and communicating openly about goals and expectations for timeline and priorities as well as establishing complementary roles will facilitate fruitful academia–industry collaborations in the future. Best practices for communication styles may be dependent on the cultural setting, and thus should be adopted accordingly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67677422019-10-18 Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators Liu, Chelsea Shao, Shuai Liu, Chang Bennett, Gary G. Prvu Bettger, Janet Yan, Lijing L Digit Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Development and uptake of digital health technologies benefit from cross-sectoral efforts from academia and industry. Our study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators associated with academia–industry collaborations in digital health in middle- and high-income countries. METHODS: Trained personnel conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 stakeholders who were active in industry, academia or both. Stakeholders were based in middle-income countries (including China) and high-income countries (including the United States) as defined by the World Bank. Interviews were conducted in the stakeholder’s language of choice (Chinese, n = 12; English, n = 11). Qualitative interview questions elicited perspectives on stakeholders’ experience with academia–industry collaboration, challenges faced, and factors that facilitated the process. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, thematically coded by bilingual coders and analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Stakeholders in both academia and industry identified complementary roles, authentic communication between partners, and clearly outlined goals or expectations prior to the collaboration as primary facilitators for success. Misaligned goals or expectations, differences in timelines for productivity and difficulties balancing expectations for business outcomes versus generation of scientific evidence were identified as primary barriers. Stakeholders in high-income countries reported inauthentic communication as a significant barrier to collaboration, whereas those in middle-income countries did not. CONCLUSION: Outlining and communicating openly about goals and expectations for timeline and priorities as well as establishing complementary roles will facilitate fruitful academia–industry collaborations in the future. Best practices for communication styles may be dependent on the cultural setting, and thus should be adopted accordingly. SAGE Publications 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6767742/ /pubmed/31632684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207619878627 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Liu, Chelsea
Shao, Shuai
Liu, Chang
Bennett, Gary G.
Prvu Bettger, Janet
Yan, Lijing L
Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators
title Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators
title_full Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators
title_fullStr Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators
title_full_unstemmed Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators
title_short Academia–industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators
title_sort academia–industry digital health collaborations: a cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055207619878627
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchelsea academiaindustrydigitalhealthcollaborationsacrossculturalanalysisofbarriersandfacilitators
AT shaoshuai academiaindustrydigitalhealthcollaborationsacrossculturalanalysisofbarriersandfacilitators
AT liuchang academiaindustrydigitalhealthcollaborationsacrossculturalanalysisofbarriersandfacilitators
AT bennettgaryg academiaindustrydigitalhealthcollaborationsacrossculturalanalysisofbarriersandfacilitators
AT prvubettgerjanet academiaindustrydigitalhealthcollaborationsacrossculturalanalysisofbarriersandfacilitators
AT yanlijingl academiaindustrydigitalhealthcollaborationsacrossculturalanalysisofbarriersandfacilitators