Cargando…
First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment against advanced gastric cancer. Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet has been recommended as the preferred first-line strategy. However, there is still a lack of a comprehensive and hierarchical evidence that compares all eligible literature...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919877726 |
_version_ | 1783454988010258432 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Ji Cai, Ming Shuai, Xiaoming Gao, Jinbo Wang, Guobin Tao, Kaixiong |
author_facet | Cheng, Ji Cai, Ming Shuai, Xiaoming Gao, Jinbo Wang, Guobin Tao, Kaixiong |
author_sort | Cheng, Ji |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment against advanced gastric cancer. Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet has been recommended as the preferred first-line strategy. However, there is still a lack of a comprehensive and hierarchical evidence that compares all eligible literature simultaneously. METHODS: Record retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, ASCO, and ESMO meeting library from inception to October 2018. Randomized controlled trials featuring comparisons between different first-line systemic treatments against advanced gastric cancer were eligible. Overall survival was utilized as the primary endpoint. Pairwise and network calculations were based on a random-effects model and the hierarchical ranking was numerically indicated by P-score. All procedures were conducted according to Cochrane Handbook 5.1 and PRISMA for Network Meta-analysis (Registration identifier: CRD42018084951). RESULTS: A total of 119 studies were eligible for our pooled analysis. Concerning general analysis, ‘fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based triplet’ topped the overall survival hierarchy (HR 0.91 [0.83–0.99], P-score = 0.903, p = 0.04) while it ranked in second place for progression-free survival and objective response rate. However, it displayed worse tolerability against ‘fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet’. More specifically, ‘Capecitabine plus cisplatin-based triplet plus targeted medication’ topped the ranking among all fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based regimens in additional analysis. Nevertheless, it did not reach statistical advantage against fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin doublet in terms of survival benefits, while still displaying significantly worse safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin doublet (especially capecitabine or S-1) should still be considered as the preferred first-line regimen owing to its comparable survival benefits and lower toxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6767753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67677532019-10-18 First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Cheng, Ji Cai, Ming Shuai, Xiaoming Gao, Jinbo Wang, Guobin Tao, Kaixiong Ther Adv Med Oncol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment against advanced gastric cancer. Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet has been recommended as the preferred first-line strategy. However, there is still a lack of a comprehensive and hierarchical evidence that compares all eligible literature simultaneously. METHODS: Record retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, ASCO, and ESMO meeting library from inception to October 2018. Randomized controlled trials featuring comparisons between different first-line systemic treatments against advanced gastric cancer were eligible. Overall survival was utilized as the primary endpoint. Pairwise and network calculations were based on a random-effects model and the hierarchical ranking was numerically indicated by P-score. All procedures were conducted according to Cochrane Handbook 5.1 and PRISMA for Network Meta-analysis (Registration identifier: CRD42018084951). RESULTS: A total of 119 studies were eligible for our pooled analysis. Concerning general analysis, ‘fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based triplet’ topped the overall survival hierarchy (HR 0.91 [0.83–0.99], P-score = 0.903, p = 0.04) while it ranked in second place for progression-free survival and objective response rate. However, it displayed worse tolerability against ‘fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet’. More specifically, ‘Capecitabine plus cisplatin-based triplet plus targeted medication’ topped the ranking among all fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based regimens in additional analysis. Nevertheless, it did not reach statistical advantage against fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin doublet in terms of survival benefits, while still displaying significantly worse safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin doublet (especially capecitabine or S-1) should still be considered as the preferred first-line regimen owing to its comparable survival benefits and lower toxicity. SAGE Publications 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6767753/ /pubmed/31632469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919877726 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Cheng, Ji Cai, Ming Shuai, Xiaoming Gao, Jinbo Wang, Guobin Tao, Kaixiong First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic
review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic
review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic
review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic
review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic
review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | first-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic
review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919877726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengji firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT caiming firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT shuaixiaoming firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT gaojinbo firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wangguobin firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT taokaixiong firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |