Cargando…

First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment against advanced gastric cancer. Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet has been recommended as the preferred first-line strategy. However, there is still a lack of a comprehensive and hierarchical evidence that compares all eligible literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Ji, Cai, Ming, Shuai, Xiaoming, Gao, Jinbo, Wang, Guobin, Tao, Kaixiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919877726
_version_ 1783454988010258432
author Cheng, Ji
Cai, Ming
Shuai, Xiaoming
Gao, Jinbo
Wang, Guobin
Tao, Kaixiong
author_facet Cheng, Ji
Cai, Ming
Shuai, Xiaoming
Gao, Jinbo
Wang, Guobin
Tao, Kaixiong
author_sort Cheng, Ji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment against advanced gastric cancer. Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet has been recommended as the preferred first-line strategy. However, there is still a lack of a comprehensive and hierarchical evidence that compares all eligible literature simultaneously. METHODS: Record retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, ASCO, and ESMO meeting library from inception to October 2018. Randomized controlled trials featuring comparisons between different first-line systemic treatments against advanced gastric cancer were eligible. Overall survival was utilized as the primary endpoint. Pairwise and network calculations were based on a random-effects model and the hierarchical ranking was numerically indicated by P-score. All procedures were conducted according to Cochrane Handbook 5.1 and PRISMA for Network Meta-analysis (Registration identifier: CRD42018084951). RESULTS: A total of 119 studies were eligible for our pooled analysis. Concerning general analysis, ‘fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based triplet’ topped the overall survival hierarchy (HR 0.91 [0.83–0.99], P-score = 0.903, p = 0.04) while it ranked in second place for progression-free survival and objective response rate. However, it displayed worse tolerability against ‘fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet’. More specifically, ‘Capecitabine plus cisplatin-based triplet plus targeted medication’ topped the ranking among all fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based regimens in additional analysis. Nevertheless, it did not reach statistical advantage against fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin doublet in terms of survival benefits, while still displaying significantly worse safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin doublet (especially capecitabine or S-1) should still be considered as the preferred first-line regimen owing to its comparable survival benefits and lower toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67677532019-10-18 First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Cheng, Ji Cai, Ming Shuai, Xiaoming Gao, Jinbo Wang, Guobin Tao, Kaixiong Ther Adv Med Oncol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy is the standard treatment against advanced gastric cancer. Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet has been recommended as the preferred first-line strategy. However, there is still a lack of a comprehensive and hierarchical evidence that compares all eligible literature simultaneously. METHODS: Record retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, ASCO, and ESMO meeting library from inception to October 2018. Randomized controlled trials featuring comparisons between different first-line systemic treatments against advanced gastric cancer were eligible. Overall survival was utilized as the primary endpoint. Pairwise and network calculations were based on a random-effects model and the hierarchical ranking was numerically indicated by P-score. All procedures were conducted according to Cochrane Handbook 5.1 and PRISMA for Network Meta-analysis (Registration identifier: CRD42018084951). RESULTS: A total of 119 studies were eligible for our pooled analysis. Concerning general analysis, ‘fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based triplet’ topped the overall survival hierarchy (HR 0.91 [0.83–0.99], P-score = 0.903, p = 0.04) while it ranked in second place for progression-free survival and objective response rate. However, it displayed worse tolerability against ‘fluoropyrimidine plus platinum doublet’. More specifically, ‘Capecitabine plus cisplatin-based triplet plus targeted medication’ topped the ranking among all fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based regimens in additional analysis. Nevertheless, it did not reach statistical advantage against fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin doublet in terms of survival benefits, while still displaying significantly worse safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin doublet (especially capecitabine or S-1) should still be considered as the preferred first-line regimen owing to its comparable survival benefits and lower toxicity. SAGE Publications 2019-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6767753/ /pubmed/31632469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919877726 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Cheng, Ji
Cai, Ming
Shuai, Xiaoming
Gao, Jinbo
Wang, Guobin
Tao, Kaixiong
First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short First-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort first-line systemic therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31632469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758835919877726
work_keys_str_mv AT chengji firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT caiming firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT shuaixiaoming firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT gaojinbo firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangguobin firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT taokaixiong firstlinesystemictherapyforadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis