Cargando…

Comparison between ultrasonographic findings and fine needle aspiration cytology in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules

The purpose of research was comparing the ultrasound (US) features and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in detecting the thyroid nodules in clinical practice. A cross-sectional analytical study retrospectively reviewed the US and FNAC findings for a total of 170 thyroid nodules. The US feature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohebbi, Mahdi, Dehaki, Mehrzad Gholampour, Mozaffari, Mahsa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31579481
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2019.8354
_version_ 1783455008837074944
author Mohebbi, Mahdi
Dehaki, Mehrzad Gholampour
Mozaffari, Mahsa
author_facet Mohebbi, Mahdi
Dehaki, Mehrzad Gholampour
Mozaffari, Mahsa
author_sort Mohebbi, Mahdi
collection PubMed
description The purpose of research was comparing the ultrasound (US) features and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in detecting the thyroid nodules in clinical practice. A cross-sectional analytical study retrospectively reviewed the US and FNAC findings for a total of 170 thyroid nodules. The US features that we compared included echogenicity, calcifications, shape, halo and Doppler, between 2017 and 2018. Totally, 170 nodules of thyroid were studied, which contained 72 (42.4%) benign and 98 (57.6%) malignant thyroid nodules. The sonographic features were significantly associated with malignancy such as microcalcification (97.0%), hyperechogenicity (91.5%), wider than taller shape (98.0%), absent halo (90.9%) and positive Doppler (78.0%) (P < 0.01). The altogether accuracies of calcification, echogenicity, shape, halo, and Doppler were 0.96, 0.92, 0.97,0.82 and 0.82, respectively. Our data suggest that US features could be a good sonographic criterion for recommending FNA cytology with follow‐up thyroid sonography and FNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6767841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67678412019-10-02 Comparison between ultrasonographic findings and fine needle aspiration cytology in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules Mohebbi, Mahdi Dehaki, Mehrzad Gholampour Mozaffari, Mahsa Eur J Transl Myol Original Article The purpose of research was comparing the ultrasound (US) features and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in detecting the thyroid nodules in clinical practice. A cross-sectional analytical study retrospectively reviewed the US and FNAC findings for a total of 170 thyroid nodules. The US features that we compared included echogenicity, calcifications, shape, halo and Doppler, between 2017 and 2018. Totally, 170 nodules of thyroid were studied, which contained 72 (42.4%) benign and 98 (57.6%) malignant thyroid nodules. The sonographic features were significantly associated with malignancy such as microcalcification (97.0%), hyperechogenicity (91.5%), wider than taller shape (98.0%), absent halo (90.9%) and positive Doppler (78.0%) (P < 0.01). The altogether accuracies of calcification, echogenicity, shape, halo, and Doppler were 0.96, 0.92, 0.97,0.82 and 0.82, respectively. Our data suggest that US features could be a good sonographic criterion for recommending FNA cytology with follow‐up thyroid sonography and FNA. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2019-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6767841/ /pubmed/31579481 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2019.8354 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohebbi, Mahdi
Dehaki, Mehrzad Gholampour
Mozaffari, Mahsa
Comparison between ultrasonographic findings and fine needle aspiration cytology in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules
title Comparison between ultrasonographic findings and fine needle aspiration cytology in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules
title_full Comparison between ultrasonographic findings and fine needle aspiration cytology in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules
title_fullStr Comparison between ultrasonographic findings and fine needle aspiration cytology in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between ultrasonographic findings and fine needle aspiration cytology in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules
title_short Comparison between ultrasonographic findings and fine needle aspiration cytology in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules
title_sort comparison between ultrasonographic findings and fine needle aspiration cytology in differentiating malignant and benign thyroid nodules
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31579481
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2019.8354
work_keys_str_mv AT mohebbimahdi comparisonbetweenultrasonographicfindingsandfineneedleaspirationcytologyindifferentiatingmalignantandbenignthyroidnodules
AT dehakimehrzadgholampour comparisonbetweenultrasonographicfindingsandfineneedleaspirationcytologyindifferentiatingmalignantandbenignthyroidnodules
AT mozaffarimahsa comparisonbetweenultrasonographicfindingsandfineneedleaspirationcytologyindifferentiatingmalignantandbenignthyroidnodules