Cargando…

Quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing alarmingly. However, the quality of vital medicines and medical products used to treat and monitor diabetes remains uncertain but of potential great public health significance. Here, we review the available evidence on the quality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saraswati, Kartika, Sichanh, Chanvilay, Newton, Paul N, Caillet, Céline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001636
_version_ 1783455089088790528
author Saraswati, Kartika
Sichanh, Chanvilay
Newton, Paul N
Caillet, Céline
author_facet Saraswati, Kartika
Sichanh, Chanvilay
Newton, Paul N
Caillet, Céline
author_sort Saraswati, Kartika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing alarmingly. However, the quality of vital medicines and medical products used to treat and monitor diabetes remains uncertain but of potential great public health significance. Here, we review the available evidence on the quality of antidiabetic medicines and supplies for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and discuss their potential impact for the patients and society. METHODS: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Google and relevant websites in English and French. The Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting Guideline (MEDQUARG) was used to assess the quality of medicine quality surveys. RESULTS: 52 publications on the quality of antidiabetic medicines, including 5 medicine quality prevalence surveys and 20 equivalence studies, were analysed. The prevalence surveys and equivalence studies included 674 samples of which 73 (10.8%) were of poor quality. The median (Q1–Q3) concordance with MEDQUARG items was 30.8% (19.2%–42.3%). No prevalence surveys on SMBG supplies’ quality were found, but 29 publications, including falsified products and incorrect results due to strip degradation or contamination, were identified. CONCLUSION: There is little accessible evidence on the quality of antidiabetic medicines and SMBG supplies. Surveys were poorly designed and reported, making data aggregation and interpretation problematic. Despite these caveats, these results suggest that there are important issues with the quality of medical products for diabetes that need focused monitoring. There is an urgent need to achieve consensus protocols for designing, conducting and reporting medical product quality surveys. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039841.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6768360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67683602019-10-21 Quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review Saraswati, Kartika Sichanh, Chanvilay Newton, Paul N Caillet, Céline BMJ Glob Health Research BACKGROUND: The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing alarmingly. However, the quality of vital medicines and medical products used to treat and monitor diabetes remains uncertain but of potential great public health significance. Here, we review the available evidence on the quality of antidiabetic medicines and supplies for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and discuss their potential impact for the patients and society. METHODS: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Google and relevant websites in English and French. The Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting Guideline (MEDQUARG) was used to assess the quality of medicine quality surveys. RESULTS: 52 publications on the quality of antidiabetic medicines, including 5 medicine quality prevalence surveys and 20 equivalence studies, were analysed. The prevalence surveys and equivalence studies included 674 samples of which 73 (10.8%) were of poor quality. The median (Q1–Q3) concordance with MEDQUARG items was 30.8% (19.2%–42.3%). No prevalence surveys on SMBG supplies’ quality were found, but 29 publications, including falsified products and incorrect results due to strip degradation or contamination, were identified. CONCLUSION: There is little accessible evidence on the quality of antidiabetic medicines and SMBG supplies. Surveys were poorly designed and reported, making data aggregation and interpretation problematic. Despite these caveats, these results suggest that there are important issues with the quality of medical products for diabetes that need focused monitoring. There is an urgent need to achieve consensus protocols for designing, conducting and reporting medical product quality surveys. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039841. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6768360/ /pubmed/31637025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001636 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Saraswati, Kartika
Sichanh, Chanvilay
Newton, Paul N
Caillet, Céline
Quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review
title Quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review
title_full Quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review
title_fullStr Quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review
title_short Quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review
title_sort quality of medical products for diabetes management: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001636
work_keys_str_mv AT saraswatikartika qualityofmedicalproductsfordiabetesmanagementasystematicreview
AT sichanhchanvilay qualityofmedicalproductsfordiabetesmanagementasystematicreview
AT newtonpauln qualityofmedicalproductsfordiabetesmanagementasystematicreview
AT cailletceline qualityofmedicalproductsfordiabetesmanagementasystematicreview