Cargando…

Promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice

BACKGROUND: As doctors, we are increasingly aware of the financial implications of our practice. The need to work in a more conscientious, efficacious and cost-effective manner is greater than ever before. Environmental and financial benefits can be seen through employing the use of low-flow anaesth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carter, Louise A, Oyewole, Molola, Bates, Eleanor, Sherratt, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000479
_version_ 1783455090296750080
author Carter, Louise A
Oyewole, Molola
Bates, Eleanor
Sherratt, Kate
author_facet Carter, Louise A
Oyewole, Molola
Bates, Eleanor
Sherratt, Kate
author_sort Carter, Louise A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As doctors, we are increasingly aware of the financial implications of our practice. The need to work in a more conscientious, efficacious and cost-effective manner is greater than ever before. Environmental and financial benefits can be seen through employing the use of low-flow anaesthesia. AIMS: This quality improvement project aimed to make anaesthetic practice more environmentally friendly and to reduce departmental spending. This could be achieved by promoting the use of low-flow anaesthesia and by encouraging isoflurane use where appropriate. METHODS: All anaesthetic consultants and trainees were invited to fill out an initial questionnaire relating to their personal preferences and practices when conducting anaesthesia. There were specific questions relating to low-flow anaesthesia and isoflurane use. Our main measure of improvement was any decrease in the number of bottles of volatile agent ordered by the department from pharmacy. Monthly spot audits were conducted to assess gas flow rates and volatile agent use in theatre. Departmental spending figures relating to the purchase of volatile agent bottles were obtained from pharmacy. Information was then disseminated to anaesthetists on a monthly basis via a ‘low-flow board’, which showed pictorial and graphical representations of differing gas flows and volatile agent usage in relation to cost. RESULTS: Our project showed a trend for the increased use of low-flow anaesthesia within the department. We also showed a decrease in the number of bottles of volatile agent ordered: 18% fewer bottles ordered compared with the same period the previous year. This represented a 25% decrease in total departmental expenditure on volatile agents despite an increase in theatre activity. CONCLUSION: Increasing awareness regarding anaesthetic choices and promoting low-flow anaesthesia and isoflurane use, translated into an overall decreased departmental spend on volatile agents without affecting patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6768376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67683762019-10-21 Promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice Carter, Louise A Oyewole, Molola Bates, Eleanor Sherratt, Kate BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report BACKGROUND: As doctors, we are increasingly aware of the financial implications of our practice. The need to work in a more conscientious, efficacious and cost-effective manner is greater than ever before. Environmental and financial benefits can be seen through employing the use of low-flow anaesthesia. AIMS: This quality improvement project aimed to make anaesthetic practice more environmentally friendly and to reduce departmental spending. This could be achieved by promoting the use of low-flow anaesthesia and by encouraging isoflurane use where appropriate. METHODS: All anaesthetic consultants and trainees were invited to fill out an initial questionnaire relating to their personal preferences and practices when conducting anaesthesia. There were specific questions relating to low-flow anaesthesia and isoflurane use. Our main measure of improvement was any decrease in the number of bottles of volatile agent ordered by the department from pharmacy. Monthly spot audits were conducted to assess gas flow rates and volatile agent use in theatre. Departmental spending figures relating to the purchase of volatile agent bottles were obtained from pharmacy. Information was then disseminated to anaesthetists on a monthly basis via a ‘low-flow board’, which showed pictorial and graphical representations of differing gas flows and volatile agent usage in relation to cost. RESULTS: Our project showed a trend for the increased use of low-flow anaesthesia within the department. We also showed a decrease in the number of bottles of volatile agent ordered: 18% fewer bottles ordered compared with the same period the previous year. This represented a 25% decrease in total departmental expenditure on volatile agents despite an increase in theatre activity. CONCLUSION: Increasing awareness regarding anaesthetic choices and promoting low-flow anaesthesia and isoflurane use, translated into an overall decreased departmental spend on volatile agents without affecting patient care. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6768376/ /pubmed/31637316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000479 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Carter, Louise A
Oyewole, Molola
Bates, Eleanor
Sherratt, Kate
Promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice
title Promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice
title_full Promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice
title_fullStr Promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice
title_full_unstemmed Promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice
title_short Promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice
title_sort promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31637316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000479
work_keys_str_mv AT carterlouisea promotinglowflowanaesthesiaandvolatileanaestheticagentchoice
AT oyewolemolola promotinglowflowanaesthesiaandvolatileanaestheticagentchoice
AT bateseleanor promotinglowflowanaesthesiaandvolatileanaestheticagentchoice
AT sherrattkate promotinglowflowanaesthesiaandvolatileanaestheticagentchoice