Cargando…
Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping
With the introduction of multi-camera systems in modern plant phenotyping new opportunities for combined multimodal image analysis emerge. Visible light (VIS), fluorescence (FLU) and near-infrared images enable scientists to study different plant traits based on optical appearance, biochemical compo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221203 |
_version_ | 1783455094024437760 |
---|---|
author | Henke, Michael Junker, Astrid Neumann, Kerstin Altmann, Thomas Gladilin, Evgeny |
author_facet | Henke, Michael Junker, Astrid Neumann, Kerstin Altmann, Thomas Gladilin, Evgeny |
author_sort | Henke, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the introduction of multi-camera systems in modern plant phenotyping new opportunities for combined multimodal image analysis emerge. Visible light (VIS), fluorescence (FLU) and near-infrared images enable scientists to study different plant traits based on optical appearance, biochemical composition and nutrition status. A straightforward analysis of high-throughput image data is hampered by a number of natural and technical factors including large variability of plant appearance, inhomogeneous illumination, shadows and reflections in the background regions. Consequently, automated segmentation of plant images represents a big challenge and often requires an extensive human-machine interaction. Combined analysis of different image modalities may enable automatisation of plant segmentation in “difficult” image modalities such as VIS images by utilising the results of segmentation of image modalities that exhibit higher contrast between plant and background, i.e. FLU images. For efficient segmentation and detection of diverse plant structures (i.e. leaf tips, flowers), image registration techniques based on feature point (FP) matching are of particular interest. However, finding reliable feature points and point pairs for differently structured plant species in multimodal images can be challenging. To address this task in a general manner, different feature point detectors should be considered. Here, a comparison of seven different feature point detectors for automated registration of VIS and FLU plant images is performed. Our experimental results show that straightforward image registration using FP detectors is prone to errors due to too large structural difference between FLU and VIS modalities. We show that structural image enhancement such as background filtering and edge image transformation significantly improves performance of FP algorithms. To overcome the limitations of single FP detectors, combination of different FP methods is suggested. We demonstrate application of our enhanced FP approach for automated registration of a large amount of FLU/VIS images of developing plant species acquired from high-throughput phenotyping experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6768447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67684472019-10-12 Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping Henke, Michael Junker, Astrid Neumann, Kerstin Altmann, Thomas Gladilin, Evgeny PLoS One Research Article With the introduction of multi-camera systems in modern plant phenotyping new opportunities for combined multimodal image analysis emerge. Visible light (VIS), fluorescence (FLU) and near-infrared images enable scientists to study different plant traits based on optical appearance, biochemical composition and nutrition status. A straightforward analysis of high-throughput image data is hampered by a number of natural and technical factors including large variability of plant appearance, inhomogeneous illumination, shadows and reflections in the background regions. Consequently, automated segmentation of plant images represents a big challenge and often requires an extensive human-machine interaction. Combined analysis of different image modalities may enable automatisation of plant segmentation in “difficult” image modalities such as VIS images by utilising the results of segmentation of image modalities that exhibit higher contrast between plant and background, i.e. FLU images. For efficient segmentation and detection of diverse plant structures (i.e. leaf tips, flowers), image registration techniques based on feature point (FP) matching are of particular interest. However, finding reliable feature points and point pairs for differently structured plant species in multimodal images can be challenging. To address this task in a general manner, different feature point detectors should be considered. Here, a comparison of seven different feature point detectors for automated registration of VIS and FLU plant images is performed. Our experimental results show that straightforward image registration using FP detectors is prone to errors due to too large structural difference between FLU and VIS modalities. We show that structural image enhancement such as background filtering and edge image transformation significantly improves performance of FP algorithms. To overcome the limitations of single FP detectors, combination of different FP methods is suggested. We demonstrate application of our enhanced FP approach for automated registration of a large amount of FLU/VIS images of developing plant species acquired from high-throughput phenotyping experiments. Public Library of Science 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6768447/ /pubmed/31568494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221203 Text en © 2019 Henke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Henke, Michael Junker, Astrid Neumann, Kerstin Altmann, Thomas Gladilin, Evgeny Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping |
title | Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping |
title_full | Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping |
title_fullStr | Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping |
title_short | Comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping |
title_sort | comparison of feature point detectors for multimodal image registration in plant phenotyping |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henkemichael comparisonoffeaturepointdetectorsformultimodalimageregistrationinplantphenotyping AT junkerastrid comparisonoffeaturepointdetectorsformultimodalimageregistrationinplantphenotyping AT neumannkerstin comparisonoffeaturepointdetectorsformultimodalimageregistrationinplantphenotyping AT altmannthomas comparisonoffeaturepointdetectorsformultimodalimageregistrationinplantphenotyping AT gladilinevgeny comparisonoffeaturepointdetectorsformultimodalimageregistrationinplantphenotyping |