Cargando…
The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations
The United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education, known as SNAP-Ed, is the country’s largest and most diverse community nutrition program. In 2017, nearly 140 SNAP-Ed implementing agencies (SIAs) and hundreds of contractors delivered nutrition educati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31570929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz115 |
_version_ | 1783455133951066112 |
---|---|
author | Naja-Riese, Andy Keller, Kimberly J M Bruno, Pamela Foerster, Susan B Puma, Jini Whetstone, Lauren MkNelly, Barbara Cullinen, Kathleen Jacobs, Laurel Sugerman, Sharon |
author_facet | Naja-Riese, Andy Keller, Kimberly J M Bruno, Pamela Foerster, Susan B Puma, Jini Whetstone, Lauren MkNelly, Barbara Cullinen, Kathleen Jacobs, Laurel Sugerman, Sharon |
author_sort | Naja-Riese, Andy |
collection | PubMed |
description | The United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education, known as SNAP-Ed, is the country’s largest and most diverse community nutrition program. In 2017, nearly 140 SNAP-Ed implementing agencies (SIAs) and hundreds of contractors delivered nutrition education to almost 5 million people in nearly 60,000 low-resource sites. Millions more were impacted with social marketing campaigns and policy, systems, and environmental changes. This article introduces and describes the benefits of the newly developed SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework (Framework) and companion Interpretive Guide to consistently measure SNAP-Ed outcomes across different settings. The Framework uses the social ecological model as its underlying theory and features 51 indicators across four levels: Individual, Environmental Supports, Sectors of Influence, and Population Results. Topline findings from the first-year Census to track Framework adoption found that most SIAs intended to impact indicators closer to the inner levels of influence: Individual (mean = 59% of SIAs; SD = 22%) and Environmental Settings (mean = 48%; SD = 23%). As yet, few SIAs targeted outcomes for long-term indicators (mean = 26%; SD = 15%), Sectors of Influence (mean = 20%; SD = 12%), or Population Results (mean = 30%; SD = 11%). An in-depth example of how one state is using the Framework is described. The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework offers a new suite of evaluation measures toward eliminating disparities that contribute to poor diet, physical inactivity, food insecurity and obesity. Practitioners will need technical assistance to implement the Framework, especially to measure longer-term, multi-sector and population results, and to maximize effectiveness in SNAP-Ed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6768857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67688572019-10-03 The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations Naja-Riese, Andy Keller, Kimberly J M Bruno, Pamela Foerster, Susan B Puma, Jini Whetstone, Lauren MkNelly, Barbara Cullinen, Kathleen Jacobs, Laurel Sugerman, Sharon Transl Behav Med Original Research The United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education, known as SNAP-Ed, is the country’s largest and most diverse community nutrition program. In 2017, nearly 140 SNAP-Ed implementing agencies (SIAs) and hundreds of contractors delivered nutrition education to almost 5 million people in nearly 60,000 low-resource sites. Millions more were impacted with social marketing campaigns and policy, systems, and environmental changes. This article introduces and describes the benefits of the newly developed SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework (Framework) and companion Interpretive Guide to consistently measure SNAP-Ed outcomes across different settings. The Framework uses the social ecological model as its underlying theory and features 51 indicators across four levels: Individual, Environmental Supports, Sectors of Influence, and Population Results. Topline findings from the first-year Census to track Framework adoption found that most SIAs intended to impact indicators closer to the inner levels of influence: Individual (mean = 59% of SIAs; SD = 22%) and Environmental Settings (mean = 48%; SD = 23%). As yet, few SIAs targeted outcomes for long-term indicators (mean = 26%; SD = 15%), Sectors of Influence (mean = 20%; SD = 12%), or Population Results (mean = 30%; SD = 11%). An in-depth example of how one state is using the Framework is described. The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework offers a new suite of evaluation measures toward eliminating disparities that contribute to poor diet, physical inactivity, food insecurity and obesity. Practitioners will need technical assistance to implement the Framework, especially to measure longer-term, multi-sector and population results, and to maximize effectiveness in SNAP-Ed. Oxford University Press 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6768857/ /pubmed/31570929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz115 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Naja-Riese, Andy Keller, Kimberly J M Bruno, Pamela Foerster, Susan B Puma, Jini Whetstone, Lauren MkNelly, Barbara Cullinen, Kathleen Jacobs, Laurel Sugerman, Sharon The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations |
title | The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations |
title_full | The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations |
title_fullStr | The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations |
title_full_unstemmed | The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations |
title_short | The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations |
title_sort | snap-ed evaluation framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31570929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT najarieseandy thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT kellerkimberlyjm thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT brunopamela thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT foerstersusanb thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT pumajini thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT whetstonelauren thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT mknellybarbara thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT cullinenkathleen thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT jacobslaurel thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT sugermansharon thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT najarieseandy snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT kellerkimberlyjm snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT brunopamela snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT foerstersusanb snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT pumajini snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT whetstonelauren snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT mknellybarbara snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT cullinenkathleen snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT jacobslaurel snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations AT sugermansharon snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations |