Cargando…

The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations

The United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education, known as SNAP-Ed, is the country’s largest and most diverse community nutrition program. In 2017, nearly 140 SNAP-Ed implementing agencies (SIAs) and hundreds of contractors delivered nutrition educati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naja-Riese, Andy, Keller, Kimberly J M, Bruno, Pamela, Foerster, Susan B, Puma, Jini, Whetstone, Lauren, MkNelly, Barbara, Cullinen, Kathleen, Jacobs, Laurel, Sugerman, Sharon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31570929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz115
_version_ 1783455133951066112
author Naja-Riese, Andy
Keller, Kimberly J M
Bruno, Pamela
Foerster, Susan B
Puma, Jini
Whetstone, Lauren
MkNelly, Barbara
Cullinen, Kathleen
Jacobs, Laurel
Sugerman, Sharon
author_facet Naja-Riese, Andy
Keller, Kimberly J M
Bruno, Pamela
Foerster, Susan B
Puma, Jini
Whetstone, Lauren
MkNelly, Barbara
Cullinen, Kathleen
Jacobs, Laurel
Sugerman, Sharon
author_sort Naja-Riese, Andy
collection PubMed
description The United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education, known as SNAP-Ed, is the country’s largest and most diverse community nutrition program. In 2017, nearly 140 SNAP-Ed implementing agencies (SIAs) and hundreds of contractors delivered nutrition education to almost 5 million people in nearly 60,000 low-resource sites. Millions more were impacted with social marketing campaigns and policy, systems, and environmental changes. This article introduces and describes the benefits of the newly developed SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework (Framework) and companion Interpretive Guide to consistently measure SNAP-Ed outcomes across different settings. The Framework uses the social ecological model as its underlying theory and features 51 indicators across four levels: Individual, Environmental Supports, Sectors of Influence, and Population Results. Topline findings from the first-year Census to track Framework adoption found that most SIAs intended to impact indicators closer to the inner levels of influence: Individual (mean = 59% of SIAs; SD = 22%) and Environmental Settings (mean = 48%; SD = 23%). As yet, few SIAs targeted outcomes for long-term indicators (mean = 26%; SD = 15%), Sectors of Influence (mean = 20%; SD = 12%), or Population Results (mean = 30%; SD = 11%). An in-depth example of how one state is using the Framework is described. The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework offers a new suite of evaluation measures toward eliminating disparities that contribute to poor diet, physical inactivity, food insecurity and obesity. Practitioners will need technical assistance to implement the Framework, especially to measure longer-term, multi-sector and population results, and to maximize effectiveness in SNAP-Ed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6768857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67688572019-10-03 The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations Naja-Riese, Andy Keller, Kimberly J M Bruno, Pamela Foerster, Susan B Puma, Jini Whetstone, Lauren MkNelly, Barbara Cullinen, Kathleen Jacobs, Laurel Sugerman, Sharon Transl Behav Med Original Research The United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education, known as SNAP-Ed, is the country’s largest and most diverse community nutrition program. In 2017, nearly 140 SNAP-Ed implementing agencies (SIAs) and hundreds of contractors delivered nutrition education to almost 5 million people in nearly 60,000 low-resource sites. Millions more were impacted with social marketing campaigns and policy, systems, and environmental changes. This article introduces and describes the benefits of the newly developed SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework (Framework) and companion Interpretive Guide to consistently measure SNAP-Ed outcomes across different settings. The Framework uses the social ecological model as its underlying theory and features 51 indicators across four levels: Individual, Environmental Supports, Sectors of Influence, and Population Results. Topline findings from the first-year Census to track Framework adoption found that most SIAs intended to impact indicators closer to the inner levels of influence: Individual (mean = 59% of SIAs; SD = 22%) and Environmental Settings (mean = 48%; SD = 23%). As yet, few SIAs targeted outcomes for long-term indicators (mean = 26%; SD = 15%), Sectors of Influence (mean = 20%; SD = 12%), or Population Results (mean = 30%; SD = 11%). An in-depth example of how one state is using the Framework is described. The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework offers a new suite of evaluation measures toward eliminating disparities that contribute to poor diet, physical inactivity, food insecurity and obesity. Practitioners will need technical assistance to implement the Framework, especially to measure longer-term, multi-sector and population results, and to maximize effectiveness in SNAP-Ed. Oxford University Press 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6768857/ /pubmed/31570929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz115 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Naja-Riese, Andy
Keller, Kimberly J M
Bruno, Pamela
Foerster, Susan B
Puma, Jini
Whetstone, Lauren
MkNelly, Barbara
Cullinen, Kathleen
Jacobs, Laurel
Sugerman, Sharon
The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations
title The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations
title_full The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations
title_fullStr The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations
title_full_unstemmed The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations
title_short The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations
title_sort snap-ed evaluation framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31570929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz115
work_keys_str_mv AT najarieseandy thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT kellerkimberlyjm thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT brunopamela thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT foerstersusanb thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT pumajini thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT whetstonelauren thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT mknellybarbara thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT cullinenkathleen thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT jacobslaurel thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT sugermansharon thesnapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT najarieseandy snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT kellerkimberlyjm snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT brunopamela snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT foerstersusanb snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT pumajini snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT whetstonelauren snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT mknellybarbara snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT cullinenkathleen snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT jacobslaurel snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations
AT sugermansharon snapedevaluationframeworkdemonstratingtheimpactofanationalframeworkforobesitypreventioninlowincomepopulations