Cargando…

Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement

This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geis, J. Raymond, Brady, Adrian, Wu, Carol C., Spencer, Jack, Ranschaert, Erik, Jaremko, Jacob L., Langer, Steve G., Kitts, Andrea Borondy, Birch, Judy, Shields, William F., van den Hoven van Genderen, Robert, Kotter, Elmar, Gichoya, Judy Wawira, Cook, Tessa S., Morgan, Matthew B., Tang, An, Safdar, Nabile M., Kohli, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8
_version_ 1783455149154369536
author Geis, J. Raymond
Brady, Adrian
Wu, Carol C.
Spencer, Jack
Ranschaert, Erik
Jaremko, Jacob L.
Langer, Steve G.
Kitts, Andrea Borondy
Birch, Judy
Shields, William F.
van den Hoven van Genderen, Robert
Kotter, Elmar
Gichoya, Judy Wawira
Cook, Tessa S.
Morgan, Matthew B.
Tang, An
Safdar, Nabile M.
Kohli, Marc
author_facet Geis, J. Raymond
Brady, Adrian
Wu, Carol C.
Spencer, Jack
Ranschaert, Erik
Jaremko, Jacob L.
Langer, Steve G.
Kitts, Andrea Borondy
Birch, Judy
Shields, William F.
van den Hoven van Genderen, Robert
Kotter, Elmar
Gichoya, Judy Wawira
Cook, Tessa S.
Morgan, Matthew B.
Tang, An
Safdar, Nabile M.
Kohli, Marc
author_sort Geis, J. Raymond
collection PubMed
description This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice. This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future. The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6768929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67689292019-10-09 Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement Geis, J. Raymond Brady, Adrian Wu, Carol C. Spencer, Jack Ranschaert, Erik Jaremko, Jacob L. Langer, Steve G. Kitts, Andrea Borondy Birch, Judy Shields, William F. van den Hoven van Genderen, Robert Kotter, Elmar Gichoya, Judy Wawira Cook, Tessa S. Morgan, Matthew B. Tang, An Safdar, Nabile M. Kohli, Marc Insights Imaging Statement This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice. This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future. The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6768929/ /pubmed/31571015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Statement
Geis, J. Raymond
Brady, Adrian
Wu, Carol C.
Spencer, Jack
Ranschaert, Erik
Jaremko, Jacob L.
Langer, Steve G.
Kitts, Andrea Borondy
Birch, Judy
Shields, William F.
van den Hoven van Genderen, Robert
Kotter, Elmar
Gichoya, Judy Wawira
Cook, Tessa S.
Morgan, Matthew B.
Tang, An
Safdar, Nabile M.
Kohli, Marc
Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_full Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_fullStr Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_full_unstemmed Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_short Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement
title_sort ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint european and north american multisociety statement
topic Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31571015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0785-8
work_keys_str_mv AT geisjraymond ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT bradyadrian ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT wucarolc ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT spencerjack ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT ranschaerterik ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT jaremkojacobl ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT langersteveg ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT kittsandreaborondy ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT birchjudy ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT shieldswilliamf ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT vandenhovenvangenderenrobert ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT kotterelmar ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT gichoyajudywawira ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT cooktessas ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT morganmatthewb ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT tangan ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT safdarnabilem ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement
AT kohlimarc ethicsofartificialintelligenceinradiologysummaryofthejointeuropeanandnorthamericanmultisocietystatement