Cargando…

Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites Response to Different Dietary Protein Sources in a Piglet Model

Dietary protein sources have the potential to affect the colon microbiome of piglets that will subsequently have a large impact on metabolic capabilities and hindgut health. This study explored the effects of different protein sources on the growth performance, diarrhea rate, apparent ileal digestib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Rui, Chang, Ling, Hou, Gaifeng, Song, Zehe, Fan, Zhiyong, He, Xi, Hou, De-Xing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00151
_version_ 1783455151722332160
author Li, Rui
Chang, Ling
Hou, Gaifeng
Song, Zehe
Fan, Zhiyong
He, Xi
Hou, De-Xing
author_facet Li, Rui
Chang, Ling
Hou, Gaifeng
Song, Zehe
Fan, Zhiyong
He, Xi
Hou, De-Xing
author_sort Li, Rui
collection PubMed
description Dietary protein sources have the potential to affect the colon microbiome of piglets that will subsequently have a large impact on metabolic capabilities and hindgut health. This study explored the effects of different protein sources on the growth performance, diarrhea rate, apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of crude protein (CP), colonic mucin chemotypes, colonic microbiome, and microbial metabolites of piglets. Twenty-four piglets were randomly divided into four groups that received isoenergetic and isonitrogenous diets containing either Palbio 50 RD (P50), Soyppt-50% (S50), concentrated degossypolized cottonseed protein (CDCP), or fish meal (FM) as the sole protein source. The experimental diets did not affect the estimated daily gain (EDG), but P50 increased fecal score compared with S50 and CDCP. CDCP increased, but P50 reduced AID of CP in comparison to FM and S50. S50 and CDCP increased the amount of mixed neutral-acidic mucins relative to P50. Venn analysis identified unique OTUs in the P50 (13), CDCP (74), FM (39), and S50 (31) groups. The protein sources did not change the colonic bacterial richness or diversity. High Escherichia abundance in the P50 and FM, great abundant of Lactobacillus in the CDCP, and high Gemmiger abundance in the S50 were found. The CDCP tended to elevate valeric acid and branched chain fatty acid (BCFA) concentrations compared with the other diets. The P50 and FM groups had greater ammonia nitrogen and methylamine contents than the S50 and CDCP groups. There was a positive correlation between the Escherichia and ammonia nitrogen, the Lactobacillus and short chain fatty acid (SCFA), and a negative correlation between the Gemmige and BCFA. These findings suggested short-term feeding of different protein sources did not affect the piglets' growth, but P50 increased the diarrhea rate. Potential pathogenic bacteria and detrimental metabolites appeared in the colons of piglets fed P50 and FM, whereas, beneficial effects were conferred upon piglets fed CDCP and S50, thus indicating that available plant proteins (cotton seed, soy) added to the diets of piglets enhanced colon health by reducing protein fermentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6768948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67689482019-10-15 Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites Response to Different Dietary Protein Sources in a Piglet Model Li, Rui Chang, Ling Hou, Gaifeng Song, Zehe Fan, Zhiyong He, Xi Hou, De-Xing Front Nutr Nutrition Dietary protein sources have the potential to affect the colon microbiome of piglets that will subsequently have a large impact on metabolic capabilities and hindgut health. This study explored the effects of different protein sources on the growth performance, diarrhea rate, apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of crude protein (CP), colonic mucin chemotypes, colonic microbiome, and microbial metabolites of piglets. Twenty-four piglets were randomly divided into four groups that received isoenergetic and isonitrogenous diets containing either Palbio 50 RD (P50), Soyppt-50% (S50), concentrated degossypolized cottonseed protein (CDCP), or fish meal (FM) as the sole protein source. The experimental diets did not affect the estimated daily gain (EDG), but P50 increased fecal score compared with S50 and CDCP. CDCP increased, but P50 reduced AID of CP in comparison to FM and S50. S50 and CDCP increased the amount of mixed neutral-acidic mucins relative to P50. Venn analysis identified unique OTUs in the P50 (13), CDCP (74), FM (39), and S50 (31) groups. The protein sources did not change the colonic bacterial richness or diversity. High Escherichia abundance in the P50 and FM, great abundant of Lactobacillus in the CDCP, and high Gemmiger abundance in the S50 were found. The CDCP tended to elevate valeric acid and branched chain fatty acid (BCFA) concentrations compared with the other diets. The P50 and FM groups had greater ammonia nitrogen and methylamine contents than the S50 and CDCP groups. There was a positive correlation between the Escherichia and ammonia nitrogen, the Lactobacillus and short chain fatty acid (SCFA), and a negative correlation between the Gemmige and BCFA. These findings suggested short-term feeding of different protein sources did not affect the piglets' growth, but P50 increased the diarrhea rate. Potential pathogenic bacteria and detrimental metabolites appeared in the colons of piglets fed P50 and FM, whereas, beneficial effects were conferred upon piglets fed CDCP and S50, thus indicating that available plant proteins (cotton seed, soy) added to the diets of piglets enhanced colon health by reducing protein fermentation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6768948/ /pubmed/31616670 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00151 Text en Copyright © 2019 Li, Chang, Hou, Song, Fan, He and Hou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Li, Rui
Chang, Ling
Hou, Gaifeng
Song, Zehe
Fan, Zhiyong
He, Xi
Hou, De-Xing
Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites Response to Different Dietary Protein Sources in a Piglet Model
title Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites Response to Different Dietary Protein Sources in a Piglet Model
title_full Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites Response to Different Dietary Protein Sources in a Piglet Model
title_fullStr Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites Response to Different Dietary Protein Sources in a Piglet Model
title_full_unstemmed Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites Response to Different Dietary Protein Sources in a Piglet Model
title_short Colonic Microbiota and Metabolites Response to Different Dietary Protein Sources in a Piglet Model
title_sort colonic microbiota and metabolites response to different dietary protein sources in a piglet model
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31616670
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00151
work_keys_str_mv AT lirui colonicmicrobiotaandmetabolitesresponsetodifferentdietaryproteinsourcesinapigletmodel
AT changling colonicmicrobiotaandmetabolitesresponsetodifferentdietaryproteinsourcesinapigletmodel
AT hougaifeng colonicmicrobiotaandmetabolitesresponsetodifferentdietaryproteinsourcesinapigletmodel
AT songzehe colonicmicrobiotaandmetabolitesresponsetodifferentdietaryproteinsourcesinapigletmodel
AT fanzhiyong colonicmicrobiotaandmetabolitesresponsetodifferentdietaryproteinsourcesinapigletmodel
AT hexi colonicmicrobiotaandmetabolitesresponsetodifferentdietaryproteinsourcesinapigletmodel
AT houdexing colonicmicrobiotaandmetabolitesresponsetodifferentdietaryproteinsourcesinapigletmodel