Cargando…

Tailored combined cytomegalovirus management in lung transplantation: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: There is no univocal prophylactic regimen to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/disease in lung transplantation (LT) recipients. The aim of this study is to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes of a tailored combined CMV management approach. METHODS: After 1-year follow up, 43 LT p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solidoro, Paolo, Patrucco, Filippo, Libertucci, Daniela, Verri, Giulia, Sidoti, Francesca, Curtoni, Antonio, Boffini, Massimo, Simonato, Erika, Rinaldi, Mauro, Cavallo, Rossana, Costa, Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6769221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466619878555
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There is no univocal prophylactic regimen to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection/disease in lung transplantation (LT) recipients. The aim of this study is to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes of a tailored combined CMV management approach. METHODS: After 1-year follow up, 43 LT patients receiving combined CMV prophylaxis with antiviral agents and CMV-specific IgG were evaluated in a retrospective observational study. Systemic and lung viral infections were investigated by molecular methods on a total of 1134 whole blood and 167 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and biopsy specimens. CMV immunity was assessed by ELISPOT assay. Clinical and therapeutic data were also evaluated. RESULTS: We found 2/167 cases of CMV pneumonia (1.2%), both in the donor-positive/recipient-positive (D(+)/R(+)) population, and 51/167 cases of CMV pulmonary infection (BAL positivity 30.5%). However, only 32/167 patients (19.1%) were treated due to their weak immunological response at CMV ELISPOT assay. Viremia ⩾100,000 copies/mL occurred in 33/1134 specimens (2.9%). Regarding CMV-serological matching (D/R), the D(+)/R(–) population had more CMV viremia episodes (p < 0.05) and fewer viremia-free days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to previous findings, our study shows a lower incidence of CMV pneumonia and viremia despite the presence of a substantial CMV load. In addition, our findings further confirm the D(+)/R(–) group to be a high-risk population for CMV viremia. Overall, a good immunological response seems to protect patients from CMV viremia and pneumonia but not from CMV alveolar replication. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.