Cargando…
Esophagojejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Circular versus Linear Stapling
PURPOSE: No standard technique has been established for esophagojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer owing to the technical difficulty and high complication rate of this procedure. This study was performed to compare the short-term outcomes of circular a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6769364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598376 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e34 |
_version_ | 1783455227170521088 |
---|---|
author | Park, Ki Bum Kim, Eun Young Song, Kyo Young |
author_facet | Park, Ki Bum Kim, Eun Young Song, Kyo Young |
author_sort | Park, Ki Bum |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: No standard technique has been established for esophagojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer owing to the technical difficulty and high complication rate of this procedure. This study was performed to compare the short-term outcomes of circular and linear stapling methods after LTG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 106 patients treated between July 2010 and July 2018 were divided into 2 groups according to the following anastomosis procedures: hemi-double-stapling technique (HDST; circular stapling method; group C, n=77) or overlap method (linear stapling method; group L, n= 29). The clinicopathological features and postoperative outcomes, including complications, were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model to identify the independent risk factors for anastomotic complications. RESULTS: The incidence of anastomotic complications was significantly higher in group C than in group L (28.0% vs. 6.9%, P=0.031). The incidence of anastomosis leakage did not differ between the groups (6.5% vs. 6.9%, P=1.000). However, anastomosis stricture occurred only in group C (13% vs. 0%, P=0.018). Multivariate analysis showed that the anastomosis type was significantly related to the risk of anastomotic complications (P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The overlap method was superior to the HDST with respect to anastomotic complications, especially anastomosis stricture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6769364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Korean Gastric Cancer Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67693642019-10-09 Esophagojejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Circular versus Linear Stapling Park, Ki Bum Kim, Eun Young Song, Kyo Young J Gastric Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: No standard technique has been established for esophagojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer owing to the technical difficulty and high complication rate of this procedure. This study was performed to compare the short-term outcomes of circular and linear stapling methods after LTG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 106 patients treated between July 2010 and July 2018 were divided into 2 groups according to the following anastomosis procedures: hemi-double-stapling technique (HDST; circular stapling method; group C, n=77) or overlap method (linear stapling method; group L, n= 29). The clinicopathological features and postoperative outcomes, including complications, were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model to identify the independent risk factors for anastomotic complications. RESULTS: The incidence of anastomotic complications was significantly higher in group C than in group L (28.0% vs. 6.9%, P=0.031). The incidence of anastomosis leakage did not differ between the groups (6.5% vs. 6.9%, P=1.000). However, anastomosis stricture occurred only in group C (13% vs. 0%, P=0.018). Multivariate analysis showed that the anastomosis type was significantly related to the risk of anastomotic complications (P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The overlap method was superior to the HDST with respect to anastomotic complications, especially anastomosis stricture. The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2019-09 2019-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6769364/ /pubmed/31598376 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e34 Text en Copyright © 2019. Korean Gastric Cancer Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, Ki Bum Kim, Eun Young Song, Kyo Young Esophagojejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Circular versus Linear Stapling |
title | Esophagojejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Circular versus Linear Stapling |
title_full | Esophagojejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Circular versus Linear Stapling |
title_fullStr | Esophagojejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Circular versus Linear Stapling |
title_full_unstemmed | Esophagojejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Circular versus Linear Stapling |
title_short | Esophagojejunal Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Circular versus Linear Stapling |
title_sort | esophagojejunal anastomosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: circular versus linear stapling |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6769364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598376 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e34 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkkibum esophagojejunalanastomosisafterlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancercircularversuslinearstapling AT kimeunyoung esophagojejunalanastomosisafterlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancercircularversuslinearstapling AT songkyoyoung esophagojejunalanastomosisafterlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancercircularversuslinearstapling |