Cargando…

Potential Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Luminal Subtype(−) Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is less effective for luminal breast cancer because luminal breast cancer has a lower rate of pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC than human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-type and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We investigated the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyung Suk, Yoo, Tae Kyung, Park, Woo Chan, Chae, Byung Joo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6769389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598341
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e35
_version_ 1783455231871287296
author Kim, Hyung Suk
Yoo, Tae Kyung
Park, Woo Chan
Chae, Byung Joo
author_facet Kim, Hyung Suk
Yoo, Tae Kyung
Park, Woo Chan
Chae, Byung Joo
author_sort Kim, Hyung Suk
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is less effective for luminal breast cancer because luminal breast cancer has a lower rate of pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC than human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-type and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We investigated the efficacy of NAC and the predictive factors of a better response in luminal breast cancer. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, we retrieved data of 244 patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who were treated with NAC followed by surgery from a prospectively collected database. We classified breast cancer into luminal HER2(−) and non-luminal HER2(−) breast cancer (luminal HER2(+), HER2(+), and TNBC types). We analyzed each subtype with respect to surgical outcomes, response to NAC, and determined variables associated with surgical outcomes and response in patients with luminal HER2(−) breast cancer. RESULTS: The total, breast, and axillary pCR rates were significantly lower in 114 patients with luminal HER2(−) breast cancer than in those with other subtypes (7.9%, 12.3%, and 22.8%, respectively). However, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) conversion and tumor response rates did not significantly differ between patients with luminal HER2(−) and those with non-luminal HER2(−) breast cancer (p = 0.836 and p = 0.180, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, high tumor response rate (≥ 46.4%) was significantly associated with an increased BCS conversion rate. In the subgroup analysis of luminal HER2(−) breast cancer, the multivariate analysis showed that higher Ki67 expression and axilla pCR and BCS conversion rates were significantly associated with tumor response to NAC. CONCLUSION: Despite the low pCR rate, the tumor response and BCS conversion rates after NAC of luminal HER2(−) breast cancer were similar to those of other subtypes. NAC has the potential benefit of reducing the size of breast cancer, thereby increasing the BCS conversion rate in luminal HER2(−) breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6769389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67693892019-10-09 Potential Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Luminal Subtype(−) Breast Cancer Kim, Hyung Suk Yoo, Tae Kyung Park, Woo Chan Chae, Byung Joo J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is less effective for luminal breast cancer because luminal breast cancer has a lower rate of pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC than human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-type and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We investigated the efficacy of NAC and the predictive factors of a better response in luminal breast cancer. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, we retrieved data of 244 patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who were treated with NAC followed by surgery from a prospectively collected database. We classified breast cancer into luminal HER2(−) and non-luminal HER2(−) breast cancer (luminal HER2(+), HER2(+), and TNBC types). We analyzed each subtype with respect to surgical outcomes, response to NAC, and determined variables associated with surgical outcomes and response in patients with luminal HER2(−) breast cancer. RESULTS: The total, breast, and axillary pCR rates were significantly lower in 114 patients with luminal HER2(−) breast cancer than in those with other subtypes (7.9%, 12.3%, and 22.8%, respectively). However, breast-conserving surgery (BCS) conversion and tumor response rates did not significantly differ between patients with luminal HER2(−) and those with non-luminal HER2(−) breast cancer (p = 0.836 and p = 0.180, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, high tumor response rate (≥ 46.4%) was significantly associated with an increased BCS conversion rate. In the subgroup analysis of luminal HER2(−) breast cancer, the multivariate analysis showed that higher Ki67 expression and axilla pCR and BCS conversion rates were significantly associated with tumor response to NAC. CONCLUSION: Despite the low pCR rate, the tumor response and BCS conversion rates after NAC of luminal HER2(−) breast cancer were similar to those of other subtypes. NAC has the potential benefit of reducing the size of breast cancer, thereby increasing the BCS conversion rate in luminal HER2(−) breast cancer. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6769389/ /pubmed/31598341 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e35 Text en © 2019 Korean Breast Cancer Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Hyung Suk
Yoo, Tae Kyung
Park, Woo Chan
Chae, Byung Joo
Potential Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Luminal Subtype(−) Breast Cancer
title Potential Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Luminal Subtype(−) Breast Cancer
title_full Potential Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Luminal Subtype(−) Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Potential Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Luminal Subtype(−) Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Potential Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Luminal Subtype(−) Breast Cancer
title_short Potential Benefits of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Luminal Subtype(−) Breast Cancer
title_sort potential benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically node-positive luminal subtype(−) breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6769389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31598341
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e35
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyungsuk potentialbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinclinicallynodepositiveluminalsubtypebreastcancer
AT yootaekyung potentialbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinclinicallynodepositiveluminalsubtypebreastcancer
AT parkwoochan potentialbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinclinicallynodepositiveluminalsubtypebreastcancer
AT chaebyungjoo potentialbenefitsofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinclinicallynodepositiveluminalsubtypebreastcancer