Cargando…

Panoptic View of Prognostic Models for Personalized Breast Cancer Management

The efforts to personalize treatment for patients with breast cancer have led to a focus on the deeper characterization of genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity among breast cancers. Traditional pathology utilizes microscopy to profile the morphologic features and organizational architecture of tum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saini, Geetanjali, Mittal, Karuna, Rida, Padmashree, Janssen, Emiel A. M., Gogineni, Keerthi, Aneja, Ritu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091325
_version_ 1783455492515823616
author Saini, Geetanjali
Mittal, Karuna
Rida, Padmashree
Janssen, Emiel A. M.
Gogineni, Keerthi
Aneja, Ritu
author_facet Saini, Geetanjali
Mittal, Karuna
Rida, Padmashree
Janssen, Emiel A. M.
Gogineni, Keerthi
Aneja, Ritu
author_sort Saini, Geetanjali
collection PubMed
description The efforts to personalize treatment for patients with breast cancer have led to a focus on the deeper characterization of genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity among breast cancers. Traditional pathology utilizes microscopy to profile the morphologic features and organizational architecture of tumor tissue for predicting the course of disease, and is the first-line set of guiding tools for customizing treatment decision-making. Currently, clinicians use this information, combined with the disease stage, to predict patient prognosis to some extent. However, tumoral heterogeneity stubbornly persists among patient subgroups delineated by these clinicopathologic characteristics, as currently used methodologies in diagnostic pathology lack the capability to discern deeper genotypic and subtler phenotypic differences among individual patients. Recent advancements in molecular pathology, however, are poised to change this by joining forces with multiple-omics technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) that provide a wealth of data about the precise molecular complement of each patient’s tumor. In addition, these technologies inform the drivers of disease aggressiveness, the determinants of therapeutic response, and new treatment targets in the individual patient. The tumor architecture information can be integrated with the knowledge of the detailed mutational, transcriptional, and proteomic phenotypes of cancer cells within individual tumors to derive a new level of biologic insight that enables powerful, data-driven patient stratification and customization of treatment for each patient, at each stage of the disease. This review summarizes the prognostic and predictive insights provided by commercially available gene expression-based tests and other multivariate or clinical -omics-based prognostic/predictive models currently under development, and proposes a more inclusive multiplatform approach to tackling the challenging heterogeneity of breast cancer to individualize its management. “The future is already here—it’s just not very evenly distributed.”-William Ford Gibson
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6770520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67705202019-10-30 Panoptic View of Prognostic Models for Personalized Breast Cancer Management Saini, Geetanjali Mittal, Karuna Rida, Padmashree Janssen, Emiel A. M. Gogineni, Keerthi Aneja, Ritu Cancers (Basel) Review The efforts to personalize treatment for patients with breast cancer have led to a focus on the deeper characterization of genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity among breast cancers. Traditional pathology utilizes microscopy to profile the morphologic features and organizational architecture of tumor tissue for predicting the course of disease, and is the first-line set of guiding tools for customizing treatment decision-making. Currently, clinicians use this information, combined with the disease stage, to predict patient prognosis to some extent. However, tumoral heterogeneity stubbornly persists among patient subgroups delineated by these clinicopathologic characteristics, as currently used methodologies in diagnostic pathology lack the capability to discern deeper genotypic and subtler phenotypic differences among individual patients. Recent advancements in molecular pathology, however, are poised to change this by joining forces with multiple-omics technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) that provide a wealth of data about the precise molecular complement of each patient’s tumor. In addition, these technologies inform the drivers of disease aggressiveness, the determinants of therapeutic response, and new treatment targets in the individual patient. The tumor architecture information can be integrated with the knowledge of the detailed mutational, transcriptional, and proteomic phenotypes of cancer cells within individual tumors to derive a new level of biologic insight that enables powerful, data-driven patient stratification and customization of treatment for each patient, at each stage of the disease. This review summarizes the prognostic and predictive insights provided by commercially available gene expression-based tests and other multivariate or clinical -omics-based prognostic/predictive models currently under development, and proposes a more inclusive multiplatform approach to tackling the challenging heterogeneity of breast cancer to individualize its management. “The future is already here—it’s just not very evenly distributed.”-William Ford Gibson MDPI 2019-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6770520/ /pubmed/31500225 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091325 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Saini, Geetanjali
Mittal, Karuna
Rida, Padmashree
Janssen, Emiel A. M.
Gogineni, Keerthi
Aneja, Ritu
Panoptic View of Prognostic Models for Personalized Breast Cancer Management
title Panoptic View of Prognostic Models for Personalized Breast Cancer Management
title_full Panoptic View of Prognostic Models for Personalized Breast Cancer Management
title_fullStr Panoptic View of Prognostic Models for Personalized Breast Cancer Management
title_full_unstemmed Panoptic View of Prognostic Models for Personalized Breast Cancer Management
title_short Panoptic View of Prognostic Models for Personalized Breast Cancer Management
title_sort panoptic view of prognostic models for personalized breast cancer management
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6770520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31500225
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers11091325
work_keys_str_mv AT sainigeetanjali panopticviewofprognosticmodelsforpersonalizedbreastcancermanagement
AT mittalkaruna panopticviewofprognosticmodelsforpersonalizedbreastcancermanagement
AT ridapadmashree panopticviewofprognosticmodelsforpersonalizedbreastcancermanagement
AT janssenemielam panopticviewofprognosticmodelsforpersonalizedbreastcancermanagement
AT goginenikeerthi panopticviewofprognosticmodelsforpersonalizedbreastcancermanagement
AT anejaritu panopticviewofprognosticmodelsforpersonalizedbreastcancermanagement