Cargando…
DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison
Here, we present a practical overview of four commonly used validation methods for DNA methylation assessment: methylation specific restriction endonucleases (MSRE) analysis, pyrosequencing, methylation specific high-resolution DNA melting (MS-HRM) and quantitative methylation specific polymerase ch...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z |
_version_ | 1783455630553513984 |
---|---|
author | Šestáková, Šárka Šálek, Cyril Remešová, Hana |
author_facet | Šestáková, Šárka Šálek, Cyril Remešová, Hana |
author_sort | Šestáková, Šárka |
collection | PubMed |
description | Here, we present a practical overview of four commonly used validation methods for DNA methylation assessment: methylation specific restriction endonucleases (MSRE) analysis, pyrosequencing, methylation specific high-resolution DNA melting (MS-HRM) and quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP). Using these methods, we measured DNA methylation levels of three loci in human genome among which one was highly methylated, one intermediately methylated and one unmethylated. We compared the methods in terms of primer design demands, methods’ feasibility, accuracy, time and money consumption, and usability for clinical diagnostics. Pyrosequencing and MS-HRM proved to be the most convenient methods. Using pyrosequencing, it is possible to analyze every CpG in a chosen region. The price of the instrument may represent the main limitation of this methodology. MS-HRM is a simple PCR-based method. The measurement was quick, cheap and very accurate. MSRE analysis is based on a methylation specific digestion of DNA. It does not require a bisulfite conversion of DNA as the other methods. MSRE analysis was very easy to perform, however, it was not suitable for intermediately methylated regions and it was also quite expensive. qMSP is a qPCR-based method that uses primers designed specifically for methylated and unmethylated alleles of a chosen region. This was the least accurate method and also the primer design and optimization of PCR conditions were highly demanding. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6771119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67711192019-10-03 DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison Šestáková, Šárka Šálek, Cyril Remešová, Hana Biol Proced Online Review Here, we present a practical overview of four commonly used validation methods for DNA methylation assessment: methylation specific restriction endonucleases (MSRE) analysis, pyrosequencing, methylation specific high-resolution DNA melting (MS-HRM) and quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP). Using these methods, we measured DNA methylation levels of three loci in human genome among which one was highly methylated, one intermediately methylated and one unmethylated. We compared the methods in terms of primer design demands, methods’ feasibility, accuracy, time and money consumption, and usability for clinical diagnostics. Pyrosequencing and MS-HRM proved to be the most convenient methods. Using pyrosequencing, it is possible to analyze every CpG in a chosen region. The price of the instrument may represent the main limitation of this methodology. MS-HRM is a simple PCR-based method. The measurement was quick, cheap and very accurate. MSRE analysis is based on a methylation specific digestion of DNA. It does not require a bisulfite conversion of DNA as the other methods. MSRE analysis was very easy to perform, however, it was not suitable for intermediately methylated regions and it was also quite expensive. qMSP is a qPCR-based method that uses primers designed specifically for methylated and unmethylated alleles of a chosen region. This was the least accurate method and also the primer design and optimization of PCR conditions were highly demanding. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6771119/ /pubmed/31582911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Šestáková, Šárka Šálek, Cyril Remešová, Hana DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison |
title | DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison |
title_full | DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison |
title_fullStr | DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison |
title_short | DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison |
title_sort | dna methylation validation methods: a coherent review with practical comparison |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sestakovasarka dnamethylationvalidationmethodsacoherentreviewwithpracticalcomparison AT salekcyril dnamethylationvalidationmethodsacoherentreviewwithpracticalcomparison AT remesovahana dnamethylationvalidationmethodsacoherentreviewwithpracticalcomparison |