Cargando…

DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison

Here, we present a practical overview of four commonly used validation methods for DNA methylation assessment: methylation specific restriction endonucleases (MSRE) analysis, pyrosequencing, methylation specific high-resolution DNA melting (MS-HRM) and quantitative methylation specific polymerase ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Šestáková, Šárka, Šálek, Cyril, Remešová, Hana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z
_version_ 1783455630553513984
author Šestáková, Šárka
Šálek, Cyril
Remešová, Hana
author_facet Šestáková, Šárka
Šálek, Cyril
Remešová, Hana
author_sort Šestáková, Šárka
collection PubMed
description Here, we present a practical overview of four commonly used validation methods for DNA methylation assessment: methylation specific restriction endonucleases (MSRE) analysis, pyrosequencing, methylation specific high-resolution DNA melting (MS-HRM) and quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP). Using these methods, we measured DNA methylation levels of three loci in human genome among which one was highly methylated, one intermediately methylated and one unmethylated. We compared the methods in terms of primer design demands, methods’ feasibility, accuracy, time and money consumption, and usability for clinical diagnostics. Pyrosequencing and MS-HRM proved to be the most convenient methods. Using pyrosequencing, it is possible to analyze every CpG in a chosen region. The price of the instrument may represent the main limitation of this methodology. MS-HRM is a simple PCR-based method. The measurement was quick, cheap and very accurate. MSRE analysis is based on a methylation specific digestion of DNA. It does not require a bisulfite conversion of DNA as the other methods. MSRE analysis was very easy to perform, however, it was not suitable for intermediately methylated regions and it was also quite expensive. qMSP is a qPCR-based method that uses primers designed specifically for methylated and unmethylated alleles of a chosen region. This was the least accurate method and also the primer design and optimization of PCR conditions were highly demanding. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6771119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67711192019-10-03 DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison Šestáková, Šárka Šálek, Cyril Remešová, Hana Biol Proced Online Review Here, we present a practical overview of four commonly used validation methods for DNA methylation assessment: methylation specific restriction endonucleases (MSRE) analysis, pyrosequencing, methylation specific high-resolution DNA melting (MS-HRM) and quantitative methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP). Using these methods, we measured DNA methylation levels of three loci in human genome among which one was highly methylated, one intermediately methylated and one unmethylated. We compared the methods in terms of primer design demands, methods’ feasibility, accuracy, time and money consumption, and usability for clinical diagnostics. Pyrosequencing and MS-HRM proved to be the most convenient methods. Using pyrosequencing, it is possible to analyze every CpG in a chosen region. The price of the instrument may represent the main limitation of this methodology. MS-HRM is a simple PCR-based method. The measurement was quick, cheap and very accurate. MSRE analysis is based on a methylation specific digestion of DNA. It does not require a bisulfite conversion of DNA as the other methods. MSRE analysis was very easy to perform, however, it was not suitable for intermediately methylated regions and it was also quite expensive. qMSP is a qPCR-based method that uses primers designed specifically for methylated and unmethylated alleles of a chosen region. This was the least accurate method and also the primer design and optimization of PCR conditions were highly demanding. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6771119/ /pubmed/31582911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Šestáková, Šárka
Šálek, Cyril
Remešová, Hana
DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison
title DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison
title_full DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison
title_fullStr DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison
title_full_unstemmed DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison
title_short DNA Methylation Validation Methods: a Coherent Review with Practical Comparison
title_sort dna methylation validation methods: a coherent review with practical comparison
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31582911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-019-0107-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sestakovasarka dnamethylationvalidationmethodsacoherentreviewwithpracticalcomparison
AT salekcyril dnamethylationvalidationmethodsacoherentreviewwithpracticalcomparison
AT remesovahana dnamethylationvalidationmethodsacoherentreviewwithpracticalcomparison