Cargando…
Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST‐defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Response patterns with immune checkpoint inhibitors may be different from those with chemotherapy. Therefore, assessment of response to immunotherapy with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, could result in premature treatment termination. The randomiz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31246283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32190 |
_version_ | 1783455695398502400 |
---|---|
author | Haddad, Robert Concha‐Benavente, Fernando Blumenschein, George Fayette, Jerome Guigay, Joel Colevas, A. Dimitrios Licitra, Lisa Kasper, Stefan Vokes, Everett E. Worden, Francis Saba, Nabil F. Tahara, Makoto Jayaprakash, Vijayvel Lynch, Mark Li, Li Gillison, Maura L. Harrington, Kevin J. Ferris, Robert L. |
author_facet | Haddad, Robert Concha‐Benavente, Fernando Blumenschein, George Fayette, Jerome Guigay, Joel Colevas, A. Dimitrios Licitra, Lisa Kasper, Stefan Vokes, Everett E. Worden, Francis Saba, Nabil F. Tahara, Makoto Jayaprakash, Vijayvel Lynch, Mark Li, Li Gillison, Maura L. Harrington, Kevin J. Ferris, Robert L. |
author_sort | Haddad, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Response patterns with immune checkpoint inhibitors may be different from those with chemotherapy. Therefore, assessment of response to immunotherapy with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, could result in premature treatment termination. The randomized, open‐label, phase 3 CheckMate 141 trial (NCT02105636), which evaluated nivolumab in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after platinum therapy, allowed treatment beyond first RECIST‐defined progression (TBP) according to protocol‐specified criteria. METHODS: In CheckMate 141, patients with RECIST‐defined progression who had a stable performance status and demonstrated clinical benefit without rapid disease progression were permitted to receive TBP with nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until further progression, which was defined as an additional ≥10% increase in tumor volume. This post hoc analysis evaluated outcomes for patients who received TBP with nivolumab. RESULTS: Of 240 patients randomized to nivolumab, 146 experienced RECIST‐defined progression. Sixty‐two of these patients received TBP, and 84 discontinued treatment (no TBP). Among the 60 TBP patients evaluable for response, 15 (25%) had no change in their tumor burden, and 15 (25%) had reductions in target lesion size; 3 patients (5%) had reductions >30%. The median overall survival among TBP patients was 12.7 months (95% confidence interval, 9.7‐14.6 months). No new safety signals were observed with TBP. Exploratory analyses of immune cell biomarkers suggested a potential relationship with initial and TBP responses. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor burden reduction was noted in a proportion of patients who received TBP with nivolumab in CheckMate 141. Additional research is warranted to identify factors predictive of a TBP benefit in this population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6771504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67715042019-10-03 Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST‐defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial Haddad, Robert Concha‐Benavente, Fernando Blumenschein, George Fayette, Jerome Guigay, Joel Colevas, A. Dimitrios Licitra, Lisa Kasper, Stefan Vokes, Everett E. Worden, Francis Saba, Nabil F. Tahara, Makoto Jayaprakash, Vijayvel Lynch, Mark Li, Li Gillison, Maura L. Harrington, Kevin J. Ferris, Robert L. Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Response patterns with immune checkpoint inhibitors may be different from those with chemotherapy. Therefore, assessment of response to immunotherapy with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, could result in premature treatment termination. The randomized, open‐label, phase 3 CheckMate 141 trial (NCT02105636), which evaluated nivolumab in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after platinum therapy, allowed treatment beyond first RECIST‐defined progression (TBP) according to protocol‐specified criteria. METHODS: In CheckMate 141, patients with RECIST‐defined progression who had a stable performance status and demonstrated clinical benefit without rapid disease progression were permitted to receive TBP with nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until further progression, which was defined as an additional ≥10% increase in tumor volume. This post hoc analysis evaluated outcomes for patients who received TBP with nivolumab. RESULTS: Of 240 patients randomized to nivolumab, 146 experienced RECIST‐defined progression. Sixty‐two of these patients received TBP, and 84 discontinued treatment (no TBP). Among the 60 TBP patients evaluable for response, 15 (25%) had no change in their tumor burden, and 15 (25%) had reductions in target lesion size; 3 patients (5%) had reductions >30%. The median overall survival among TBP patients was 12.7 months (95% confidence interval, 9.7‐14.6 months). No new safety signals were observed with TBP. Exploratory analyses of immune cell biomarkers suggested a potential relationship with initial and TBP responses. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor burden reduction was noted in a proportion of patients who received TBP with nivolumab in CheckMate 141. Additional research is warranted to identify factors predictive of a TBP benefit in this population. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-27 2019-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6771504/ /pubmed/31246283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32190 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Haddad, Robert Concha‐Benavente, Fernando Blumenschein, George Fayette, Jerome Guigay, Joel Colevas, A. Dimitrios Licitra, Lisa Kasper, Stefan Vokes, Everett E. Worden, Francis Saba, Nabil F. Tahara, Makoto Jayaprakash, Vijayvel Lynch, Mark Li, Li Gillison, Maura L. Harrington, Kevin J. Ferris, Robert L. Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST‐defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial |
title | Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST‐defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial |
title_full | Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST‐defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST‐defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST‐defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial |
title_short | Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST‐defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial |
title_sort | nivolumab treatment beyond recist‐defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in checkmate 141: a subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31246283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haddadrobert nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT conchabenaventefernando nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT blumenscheingeorge nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT fayettejerome nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT guigayjoel nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT colevasadimitrios nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT licitralisa nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT kasperstefan nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT vokeseverette nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT wordenfrancis nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT sabanabilf nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT taharamakoto nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT jayaprakashvijayvel nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT lynchmark nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT lili nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT gillisonmaural nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT harringtonkevinj nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial AT ferrisrobertl nivolumabtreatmentbeyondrecistdefinedprogressioninrecurrentormetastaticsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheheadandneckincheckmate141asubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3clinicaltrial |