Cargando…
An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry
BACKGROUND: Growth retardation is one of the main hallmarks of CHARGE syndrome (CS), yet little is known about the body proportions of these children. Knowledge of body proportions in CS may contribute to a better characterization of this syndrome. This knowledge is important when considering starti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61215 |
_version_ | 1783455697601560576 |
---|---|
author | Penders, Bas Dijk, Dieuwerke R. Bocca, Gianni Zimmermann, Luc J. I. van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Conny M. A. Gerver, Willem‐Jan M. |
author_facet | Penders, Bas Dijk, Dieuwerke R. Bocca, Gianni Zimmermann, Luc J. I. van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Conny M. A. Gerver, Willem‐Jan M. |
author_sort | Penders, Bas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Growth retardation is one of the main hallmarks of CHARGE syndrome (CS), yet little is known about the body proportions of these children. Knowledge of body proportions in CS may contribute to a better characterization of this syndrome. This knowledge is important when considering starting growth‐stimulating therapy. METHODS: For this cross‐sectional study, we selected 32 children with CS and a CHD7 mutation at the Dutch CHARGE Family Day in 2016 or 2017 and the International CHARGE conference in Orlando, Florida, in 2017. We used photogrammetric anthropometry—a measurement method based on digital photographs—to determine various body proportions. We compared these to measurements in 21 normally proportioned children with growth hormone deficiency, using independent‐samples t test, Mann–Whitney U test, or chi‐square test as appropriate. RESULTS: Children with CS appear to have a shorter trunk in proportion to their height, head length, and arm length. Children with CS also had smaller feet proportional to tibia length compared to controls. The change of body proportions with age was similar in children with CS and controls. CONCLUSION: Body proportions in children with CS are significantly different from those of normally proportioned controls, but a similar change of body proportions with age was noted for both groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6771509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67715092019-10-03 An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry Penders, Bas Dijk, Dieuwerke R. Bocca, Gianni Zimmermann, Luc J. I. van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Conny M. A. Gerver, Willem‐Jan M. Am J Med Genet A Original Articles BACKGROUND: Growth retardation is one of the main hallmarks of CHARGE syndrome (CS), yet little is known about the body proportions of these children. Knowledge of body proportions in CS may contribute to a better characterization of this syndrome. This knowledge is important when considering starting growth‐stimulating therapy. METHODS: For this cross‐sectional study, we selected 32 children with CS and a CHD7 mutation at the Dutch CHARGE Family Day in 2016 or 2017 and the International CHARGE conference in Orlando, Florida, in 2017. We used photogrammetric anthropometry—a measurement method based on digital photographs—to determine various body proportions. We compared these to measurements in 21 normally proportioned children with growth hormone deficiency, using independent‐samples t test, Mann–Whitney U test, or chi‐square test as appropriate. RESULTS: Children with CS appear to have a shorter trunk in proportion to their height, head length, and arm length. Children with CS also had smaller feet proportional to tibia length compared to controls. The change of body proportions with age was similar in children with CS and controls. CONCLUSION: Body proportions in children with CS are significantly different from those of normally proportioned controls, but a similar change of body proportions with age was noted for both groups. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-05-27 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6771509/ /pubmed/31134750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61215 Text en © 2019 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Penders, Bas Dijk, Dieuwerke R. Bocca, Gianni Zimmermann, Luc J. I. van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Conny M. A. Gerver, Willem‐Jan M. An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry |
title | An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry |
title_full | An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry |
title_fullStr | An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry |
title_short | An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry |
title_sort | analysis of body proportions in children with charge syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pendersbas ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT dijkdieuwerker ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT boccagianni ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT zimmermannlucji ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT vanravenswaaijartsconnyma ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT gerverwillemjanm ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT pendersbas analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT dijkdieuwerker analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT boccagianni analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT zimmermannlucji analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT vanravenswaaijartsconnyma analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry AT gerverwillemjanm analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry |