Cargando…

An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry

BACKGROUND: Growth retardation is one of the main hallmarks of CHARGE syndrome (CS), yet little is known about the body proportions of these children. Knowledge of body proportions in CS may contribute to a better characterization of this syndrome. This knowledge is important when considering starti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penders, Bas, Dijk, Dieuwerke R., Bocca, Gianni, Zimmermann, Luc J. I., van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Conny M. A., Gerver, Willem‐Jan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61215
_version_ 1783455697601560576
author Penders, Bas
Dijk, Dieuwerke R.
Bocca, Gianni
Zimmermann, Luc J. I.
van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Conny M. A.
Gerver, Willem‐Jan M.
author_facet Penders, Bas
Dijk, Dieuwerke R.
Bocca, Gianni
Zimmermann, Luc J. I.
van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Conny M. A.
Gerver, Willem‐Jan M.
author_sort Penders, Bas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Growth retardation is one of the main hallmarks of CHARGE syndrome (CS), yet little is known about the body proportions of these children. Knowledge of body proportions in CS may contribute to a better characterization of this syndrome. This knowledge is important when considering starting growth‐stimulating therapy. METHODS: For this cross‐sectional study, we selected 32 children with CS and a CHD7 mutation at the Dutch CHARGE Family Day in 2016 or 2017 and the International CHARGE conference in Orlando, Florida, in 2017. We used photogrammetric anthropometry—a measurement method based on digital photographs—to determine various body proportions. We compared these to measurements in 21 normally proportioned children with growth hormone deficiency, using independent‐samples t test, Mann–Whitney U test, or chi‐square test as appropriate. RESULTS: Children with CS appear to have a shorter trunk in proportion to their height, head length, and arm length. Children with CS also had smaller feet proportional to tibia length compared to controls. The change of body proportions with age was similar in children with CS and controls. CONCLUSION: Body proportions in children with CS are significantly different from those of normally proportioned controls, but a similar change of body proportions with age was noted for both groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6771509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67715092019-10-03 An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry Penders, Bas Dijk, Dieuwerke R. Bocca, Gianni Zimmermann, Luc J. I. van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Conny M. A. Gerver, Willem‐Jan M. Am J Med Genet A Original Articles BACKGROUND: Growth retardation is one of the main hallmarks of CHARGE syndrome (CS), yet little is known about the body proportions of these children. Knowledge of body proportions in CS may contribute to a better characterization of this syndrome. This knowledge is important when considering starting growth‐stimulating therapy. METHODS: For this cross‐sectional study, we selected 32 children with CS and a CHD7 mutation at the Dutch CHARGE Family Day in 2016 or 2017 and the International CHARGE conference in Orlando, Florida, in 2017. We used photogrammetric anthropometry—a measurement method based on digital photographs—to determine various body proportions. We compared these to measurements in 21 normally proportioned children with growth hormone deficiency, using independent‐samples t test, Mann–Whitney U test, or chi‐square test as appropriate. RESULTS: Children with CS appear to have a shorter trunk in proportion to their height, head length, and arm length. Children with CS also had smaller feet proportional to tibia length compared to controls. The change of body proportions with age was similar in children with CS and controls. CONCLUSION: Body proportions in children with CS are significantly different from those of normally proportioned controls, but a similar change of body proportions with age was noted for both groups. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-05-27 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6771509/ /pubmed/31134750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61215 Text en © 2019 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Penders, Bas
Dijk, Dieuwerke R.
Bocca, Gianni
Zimmermann, Luc J. I.
van Ravenswaaij‐Arts, Conny M. A.
Gerver, Willem‐Jan M.
An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry
title An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry
title_full An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry
title_fullStr An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry
title_short An analysis of body proportions in children with CHARGE syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry
title_sort analysis of body proportions in children with charge syndrome using photogrammetric anthropometry
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31134750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61215
work_keys_str_mv AT pendersbas ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT dijkdieuwerker ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT boccagianni ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT zimmermannlucji ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT vanravenswaaijartsconnyma ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT gerverwillemjanm ananalysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT pendersbas analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT dijkdieuwerker analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT boccagianni analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT zimmermannlucji analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT vanravenswaaijartsconnyma analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry
AT gerverwillemjanm analysisofbodyproportionsinchildrenwithchargesyndromeusingphotogrammetricanthropometry