Cargando…

Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes

In sign languages, the task of communicating a shape involves drawing in the air with one moving hand (Method One) or two (Method Two). Since the movement path is iconic, method choice might be based on the shape. In the present studies we aimed to determine whether geometric properties motivate met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrara, Casey, Napoli, Donna Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31529533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12741
_version_ 1783455698872434688
author Ferrara, Casey
Napoli, Donna Jo
author_facet Ferrara, Casey
Napoli, Donna Jo
author_sort Ferrara, Casey
collection PubMed
description In sign languages, the task of communicating a shape involves drawing in the air with one moving hand (Method One) or two (Method Two). Since the movement path is iconic, method choice might be based on the shape. In the present studies we aimed to determine whether geometric properties motivate method choice. In a study of 17 deaf signers from six countries, the strongest predictors of method choice were whether the shape has any curved edges (Method One), and whether the shape is symmetrical across the Y‐axis (Method Two), where the default was Method One. In a second study of ASL dictionary entries for which the movement path of the sign is iconic of an entity's shape, the same predictors surfaced. These tendencies are captured in the Lexical Drawing Principle, which is coherent with biological constraints on movement in general. Drawing in the air with two hands, however, is costly, both cognitively and biomechanically. Furthermore, it distinguishes signers from non‐signers, who draw shapes with only one hand. Signers assume this extra cost in the lexicon because of the enhanced iconicity the possibility of two hands offers; they assume it in drawing shapes in the air because they apply the same linguistic principle they use in the lexicon. Additionally, having a choice of methods allows the signer to benefit from over‐specification in providing redundant information about the shape, enhancing comprehensibility and resolving ambiguity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6771514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67715142019-10-03 Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes Ferrara, Casey Napoli, Donna Jo Cogn Sci Regular Articles In sign languages, the task of communicating a shape involves drawing in the air with one moving hand (Method One) or two (Method Two). Since the movement path is iconic, method choice might be based on the shape. In the present studies we aimed to determine whether geometric properties motivate method choice. In a study of 17 deaf signers from six countries, the strongest predictors of method choice were whether the shape has any curved edges (Method One), and whether the shape is symmetrical across the Y‐axis (Method Two), where the default was Method One. In a second study of ASL dictionary entries for which the movement path of the sign is iconic of an entity's shape, the same predictors surfaced. These tendencies are captured in the Lexical Drawing Principle, which is coherent with biological constraints on movement in general. Drawing in the air with two hands, however, is costly, both cognitively and biomechanically. Furthermore, it distinguishes signers from non‐signers, who draw shapes with only one hand. Signers assume this extra cost in the lexicon because of the enhanced iconicity the possibility of two hands offers; they assume it in drawing shapes in the air because they apply the same linguistic principle they use in the lexicon. Additionally, having a choice of methods allows the signer to benefit from over‐specification in providing redundant information about the shape, enhancing comprehensibility and resolving ambiguity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-12 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6771514/ /pubmed/31529533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12741 Text en © 2019 The Authors Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Cognitive Science Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Ferrara, Casey
Napoli, Donna Jo
Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes
title Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes
title_full Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes
title_fullStr Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes
title_full_unstemmed Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes
title_short Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes
title_sort manual movement in sign languages: one hand versus two in communicating shapes
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31529533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12741
work_keys_str_mv AT ferraracasey manualmovementinsignlanguagesonehandversustwoincommunicatingshapes
AT napolidonnajo manualmovementinsignlanguagesonehandversustwoincommunicatingshapes