Cargando…

Determination of the triple oxygen and carbon isotopic composition of CO(2) from atomic ion fragments formed in the ion source of the 253 Ultra high‐resolution isotope ratio mass spectrometer

RATIONALE: Determination of δ(17)O values directly from CO(2) with traditional gas source isotope ratio mass spectrometry is not possible due to isobaric interference of (13)C(16)O(16)O on (12)C(17)O(16)O. The methods developed so far use either chemical conversion or isotope equilibration to determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adnew, Getachew A., Hofmann, Magdalena E.G., Paul, Dipayan, Laskar, Amzad, Surma, Jakub, Albrecht, Nina, Pack, Andreas, Schwieters, Johannes, Koren, Gerbrand, Peters, Wouter, Röckmann, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31063233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8478
Descripción
Sumario:RATIONALE: Determination of δ(17)O values directly from CO(2) with traditional gas source isotope ratio mass spectrometry is not possible due to isobaric interference of (13)C(16)O(16)O on (12)C(17)O(16)O. The methods developed so far use either chemical conversion or isotope equilibration to determine the δ(17)O value of CO(2). In addition, δ(13)C measurements require correction for the interference from (12)C(17)O(16)O on (13)C(16)O(16)O since it is not possible to resolve the two isotopologues. METHODS: We present a technique to determine the δ(17)O, δ(18)O and δ(13)C values of CO(2) from the fragment ions that are formed upon electron ionization in the ion source of the Thermo Scientific 253 Ultra high‐resolution isotope ratio mass spectrometer (hereafter 253 Ultra). The new technique is compared with the CO(2)‐O(2) exchange method and the (17)O‐correction algorithm for δ(17)O and δ(13)C values, respectively. RESULTS: The scale contractions for δ(13)C and δ(18)O values are slightly larger for fragment ion measurements than for molecular ion measurements. The δ(17)O and Δ(17)O values of CO(2) can be measured on the (17)O(+) fragment with an internal error that is a factor 1–2 above the counting statistics limit. The ultimate precision depends on the signal intensity and on the total time that the (17)O(+) beam is monitored; a precision of 14 ppm (parts per million) (standard error of the mean) was achieved in 20 hours at the University of Göttingen. The Δ(17)O measurements with the O‐fragment method agree with the CO(2)‐O(2) exchange method over a range of Δ(17)O values of −0.3 to +0.7‰. CONCLUSIONS: Isotope measurements on atom fragment ions of CO(2) can be used as an alternative method to determine the carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of CO(2) without chemical processing or corrections for mass interferences.