Cargando…
Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes
The catalytic hydrogenation of different aldehydes to the corresponding alcohols was investigated using an Fe(II) hydride pincer complex as catalyst in the supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) reaction mode. Two different ionic liquids of the type [X(4441)][NTf(2)] with X=N or P were applied with mes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201900636 |
_version_ | 1783455732157382656 |
---|---|
author | Csendes, Zita Brünig, Julian Yigit, Nevzat Rupprechter, Günther Bica‐Schröder, Katharina Hoffmann, Helmuth Kirchner, Karl |
author_facet | Csendes, Zita Brünig, Julian Yigit, Nevzat Rupprechter, Günther Bica‐Schröder, Katharina Hoffmann, Helmuth Kirchner, Karl |
author_sort | Csendes, Zita |
collection | PubMed |
description | The catalytic hydrogenation of different aldehydes to the corresponding alcohols was investigated using an Fe(II) hydride pincer complex as catalyst in the supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) reaction mode. Two different ionic liquids of the type [X(4441)][NTf(2)] with X=N or P were applied with mesoporous silica gel as support, which was coated first with a chemisorbed monolayer of the corresponding modified IL to remove acidic surface OH‐groups and to prevent IL leaching. Quantitative conversion with turn‐over frequencies in the order of 1000 h(–) (1) were obtained for various aromatic and heteroaromatic aldehydes and highly selective aldehyde reduction was observed also for substrates containing reducible C=C bonds. Aldehydes with longer aliphatic chains or cycloalkyl substituents, however, showed no conversion here, in contrast to a previous study with an imidazolium‐based ionic liquid. These differences were ascribed primarily to differences in substrate/ionic liquid interactions. Whereas [N(4441)][NTf(2)] and [P(4441)][NTf(2)] gave essentially identical results for different substrates in single‐batch reactions, prolonged use of the catalyst in repeated reaction cycles lead to a quick drop‐off in catalyst activity in [P(4441)][NTf(2)], but a continuous, quantitative conversion in [N(4441)][NTf(2)]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6771636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67716362019-10-03 Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes Csendes, Zita Brünig, Julian Yigit, Nevzat Rupprechter, Günther Bica‐Schröder, Katharina Hoffmann, Helmuth Kirchner, Karl Eur J Inorg Chem Full Papers The catalytic hydrogenation of different aldehydes to the corresponding alcohols was investigated using an Fe(II) hydride pincer complex as catalyst in the supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) reaction mode. Two different ionic liquids of the type [X(4441)][NTf(2)] with X=N or P were applied with mesoporous silica gel as support, which was coated first with a chemisorbed monolayer of the corresponding modified IL to remove acidic surface OH‐groups and to prevent IL leaching. Quantitative conversion with turn‐over frequencies in the order of 1000 h(–) (1) were obtained for various aromatic and heteroaromatic aldehydes and highly selective aldehyde reduction was observed also for substrates containing reducible C=C bonds. Aldehydes with longer aliphatic chains or cycloalkyl substituents, however, showed no conversion here, in contrast to a previous study with an imidazolium‐based ionic liquid. These differences were ascribed primarily to differences in substrate/ionic liquid interactions. Whereas [N(4441)][NTf(2)] and [P(4441)][NTf(2)] gave essentially identical results for different substrates in single‐batch reactions, prolonged use of the catalyst in repeated reaction cycles lead to a quick drop‐off in catalyst activity in [P(4441)][NTf(2)], but a continuous, quantitative conversion in [N(4441)][NTf(2)]. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-29 2019-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6771636/ /pubmed/31588182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201900636 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers Csendes, Zita Brünig, Julian Yigit, Nevzat Rupprechter, Günther Bica‐Schröder, Katharina Hoffmann, Helmuth Kirchner, Karl Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes |
title | Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes |
title_full | Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes |
title_fullStr | Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes |
title_short | Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes |
title_sort | influence of the ionic liquid on the activity of a supported ionic liquid phase fe(ii) pincer catalyst for the hydrogenation of aldehydes |
topic | Full Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201900636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT csendeszita influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes AT brunigjulian influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes AT yigitnevzat influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes AT rupprechtergunther influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes AT bicaschroderkatharina influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes AT hoffmannhelmuth influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes AT kirchnerkarl influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes |