Cargando…

Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes

The catalytic hydrogenation of different aldehydes to the corresponding alcohols was investigated using an Fe(II) hydride pincer complex as catalyst in the supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) reaction mode. Two different ionic liquids of the type [X(4441)][NTf(2)] with X=N or P were applied with mes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Csendes, Zita, Brünig, Julian, Yigit, Nevzat, Rupprechter, Günther, Bica‐Schröder, Katharina, Hoffmann, Helmuth, Kirchner, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201900636
_version_ 1783455732157382656
author Csendes, Zita
Brünig, Julian
Yigit, Nevzat
Rupprechter, Günther
Bica‐Schröder, Katharina
Hoffmann, Helmuth
Kirchner, Karl
author_facet Csendes, Zita
Brünig, Julian
Yigit, Nevzat
Rupprechter, Günther
Bica‐Schröder, Katharina
Hoffmann, Helmuth
Kirchner, Karl
author_sort Csendes, Zita
collection PubMed
description The catalytic hydrogenation of different aldehydes to the corresponding alcohols was investigated using an Fe(II) hydride pincer complex as catalyst in the supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) reaction mode. Two different ionic liquids of the type [X(4441)][NTf(2)] with X=N or P were applied with mesoporous silica gel as support, which was coated first with a chemisorbed monolayer of the corresponding modified IL to remove acidic surface OH‐groups and to prevent IL leaching. Quantitative conversion with turn‐over frequencies in the order of 1000 h(–) (1) were obtained for various aromatic and heteroaromatic aldehydes and highly selective aldehyde reduction was observed also for substrates containing reducible C=C bonds. Aldehydes with longer aliphatic chains or cycloalkyl substituents, however, showed no conversion here, in contrast to a previous study with an imidazolium‐based ionic liquid. These differences were ascribed primarily to differences in substrate/ionic liquid interactions. Whereas [N(4441)][NTf(2)] and [P(4441)][NTf(2)] gave essentially identical results for different substrates in single‐batch reactions, prolonged use of the catalyst in repeated reaction cycles lead to a quick drop‐off in catalyst activity in [P(4441)][NTf(2)], but a continuous, quantitative conversion in [N(4441)][NTf(2)].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6771636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67716362019-10-03 Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes Csendes, Zita Brünig, Julian Yigit, Nevzat Rupprechter, Günther Bica‐Schröder, Katharina Hoffmann, Helmuth Kirchner, Karl Eur J Inorg Chem Full Papers The catalytic hydrogenation of different aldehydes to the corresponding alcohols was investigated using an Fe(II) hydride pincer complex as catalyst in the supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) reaction mode. Two different ionic liquids of the type [X(4441)][NTf(2)] with X=N or P were applied with mesoporous silica gel as support, which was coated first with a chemisorbed monolayer of the corresponding modified IL to remove acidic surface OH‐groups and to prevent IL leaching. Quantitative conversion with turn‐over frequencies in the order of 1000 h(–) (1) were obtained for various aromatic and heteroaromatic aldehydes and highly selective aldehyde reduction was observed also for substrates containing reducible C=C bonds. Aldehydes with longer aliphatic chains or cycloalkyl substituents, however, showed no conversion here, in contrast to a previous study with an imidazolium‐based ionic liquid. These differences were ascribed primarily to differences in substrate/ionic liquid interactions. Whereas [N(4441)][NTf(2)] and [P(4441)][NTf(2)] gave essentially identical results for different substrates in single‐batch reactions, prolonged use of the catalyst in repeated reaction cycles lead to a quick drop‐off in catalyst activity in [P(4441)][NTf(2)], but a continuous, quantitative conversion in [N(4441)][NTf(2)]. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-29 2019-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6771636/ /pubmed/31588182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201900636 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Csendes, Zita
Brünig, Julian
Yigit, Nevzat
Rupprechter, Günther
Bica‐Schröder, Katharina
Hoffmann, Helmuth
Kirchner, Karl
Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes
title Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes
title_full Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes
title_fullStr Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes
title_short Influence of the Ionic Liquid on the Activity of a Supported Ionic Liquid Phase Fe(II) Pincer Catalyst for the Hydrogenation of Aldehydes
title_sort influence of the ionic liquid on the activity of a supported ionic liquid phase fe(ii) pincer catalyst for the hydrogenation of aldehydes
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201900636
work_keys_str_mv AT csendeszita influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes
AT brunigjulian influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes
AT yigitnevzat influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes
AT rupprechtergunther influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes
AT bicaschroderkatharina influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes
AT hoffmannhelmuth influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes
AT kirchnerkarl influenceoftheionicliquidontheactivityofasupportedionicliquidphasefeiipincercatalystforthehydrogenationofaldehydes