Cargando…
Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison
Scrippsiella is a cosmopolitan dinoflagellate genus that is able to form Harmful Algal Blooms in coastal waters. The large physiological, morphological, and genetic variability that characterizes this genus suggest the existence of cryptic species. In this study, flow cytometric analyses were carrie...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31273941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23849 |
_version_ | 1783455753413066752 |
---|---|
author | Fagín, Elena Bravo, Isabel Garrido, José Luis Rodríguez, Francisco Figueroa, Rosa I. |
author_facet | Fagín, Elena Bravo, Isabel Garrido, José Luis Rodríguez, Francisco Figueroa, Rosa I. |
author_sort | Fagín, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Scrippsiella is a cosmopolitan dinoflagellate genus that is able to form Harmful Algal Blooms in coastal waters. The large physiological, morphological, and genetic variability that characterizes this genus suggest the existence of cryptic species. In this study, flow cytometric analyses were carried out to compare the cell cycle and life cycle of two Scrippsiella strains from two different species: Scrippsiella ramonii (VGO1053) and Scrippsiella acuminata (S3V). Both species were also investigated by internally transcribed spacer rDNA sequencing and high‐performance liquid chromatography‐based pigment analyses. The reddish‐brown color of S. acuminata and yellowish‐green hue of S. ramonii were consistent with the quantitative differences determined in their pigment profiles. Our results indicate that the cell cycle is light‐controlled and that it differs in the two species. S‐phase was detected during the light period in both, whereas the G2/M phase occurred during the light period in S. ramonii but under dark conditions in S. acuminata. The detection of 4C stages, mobile zygotes (planozygotes), and resting cysts in S. ramonii (nonclonal) provided convincing evidence of sexuality in this species. Sexual related processes were not found in the clonal S. acuminata strain, suggesting its heterothallic behavior (i.e., the need for outcrossing). The differences in the genome size of these species were examined as well. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6771724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67717242019-10-07 Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison Fagín, Elena Bravo, Isabel Garrido, José Luis Rodríguez, Francisco Figueroa, Rosa I. Cytometry A Original Articles Scrippsiella is a cosmopolitan dinoflagellate genus that is able to form Harmful Algal Blooms in coastal waters. The large physiological, morphological, and genetic variability that characterizes this genus suggest the existence of cryptic species. In this study, flow cytometric analyses were carried out to compare the cell cycle and life cycle of two Scrippsiella strains from two different species: Scrippsiella ramonii (VGO1053) and Scrippsiella acuminata (S3V). Both species were also investigated by internally transcribed spacer rDNA sequencing and high‐performance liquid chromatography‐based pigment analyses. The reddish‐brown color of S. acuminata and yellowish‐green hue of S. ramonii were consistent with the quantitative differences determined in their pigment profiles. Our results indicate that the cell cycle is light‐controlled and that it differs in the two species. S‐phase was detected during the light period in both, whereas the G2/M phase occurred during the light period in S. ramonii but under dark conditions in S. acuminata. The detection of 4C stages, mobile zygotes (planozygotes), and resting cysts in S. ramonii (nonclonal) provided convincing evidence of sexuality in this species. Sexual related processes were not found in the clonal S. acuminata strain, suggesting its heterothallic behavior (i.e., the need for outcrossing). The differences in the genome size of these species were examined as well. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-07-05 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6771724/ /pubmed/31273941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23849 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Fagín, Elena Bravo, Isabel Garrido, José Luis Rodríguez, Francisco Figueroa, Rosa I. Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison |
title |
Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison |
title_full |
Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison |
title_fullStr |
Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison |
title_short |
Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison |
title_sort | scrippsiella acuminata versus scrippsiella ramonii: a physiological comparison |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31273941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23849 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faginelena scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison AT bravoisabel scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison AT garridojoseluis scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison AT rodriguezfrancisco scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison AT figueroarosai scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison |