Cargando…

Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison

Scrippsiella is a cosmopolitan dinoflagellate genus that is able to form Harmful Algal Blooms in coastal waters. The large physiological, morphological, and genetic variability that characterizes this genus suggest the existence of cryptic species. In this study, flow cytometric analyses were carrie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fagín, Elena, Bravo, Isabel, Garrido, José Luis, Rodríguez, Francisco, Figueroa, Rosa I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31273941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23849
_version_ 1783455753413066752
author Fagín, Elena
Bravo, Isabel
Garrido, José Luis
Rodríguez, Francisco
Figueroa, Rosa I.
author_facet Fagín, Elena
Bravo, Isabel
Garrido, José Luis
Rodríguez, Francisco
Figueroa, Rosa I.
author_sort Fagín, Elena
collection PubMed
description Scrippsiella is a cosmopolitan dinoflagellate genus that is able to form Harmful Algal Blooms in coastal waters. The large physiological, morphological, and genetic variability that characterizes this genus suggest the existence of cryptic species. In this study, flow cytometric analyses were carried out to compare the cell cycle and life cycle of two Scrippsiella strains from two different species: Scrippsiella ramonii (VGO1053) and Scrippsiella acuminata (S3V). Both species were also investigated by internally transcribed spacer rDNA sequencing and high‐performance liquid chromatography‐based pigment analyses. The reddish‐brown color of S. acuminata and yellowish‐green hue of S. ramonii were consistent with the quantitative differences determined in their pigment profiles. Our results indicate that the cell cycle is light‐controlled and that it differs in the two species. S‐phase was detected during the light period in both, whereas the G2/M phase occurred during the light period in S. ramonii but under dark conditions in S. acuminata. The detection of 4C stages, mobile zygotes (planozygotes), and resting cysts in S. ramonii (nonclonal) provided convincing evidence of sexuality in this species. Sexual related processes were not found in the clonal S. acuminata strain, suggesting its heterothallic behavior (i.e., the need for outcrossing). The differences in the genome size of these species were examined as well. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6771724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67717242019-10-07 Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison Fagín, Elena Bravo, Isabel Garrido, José Luis Rodríguez, Francisco Figueroa, Rosa I. Cytometry A Original Articles Scrippsiella is a cosmopolitan dinoflagellate genus that is able to form Harmful Algal Blooms in coastal waters. The large physiological, morphological, and genetic variability that characterizes this genus suggest the existence of cryptic species. In this study, flow cytometric analyses were carried out to compare the cell cycle and life cycle of two Scrippsiella strains from two different species: Scrippsiella ramonii (VGO1053) and Scrippsiella acuminata (S3V). Both species were also investigated by internally transcribed spacer rDNA sequencing and high‐performance liquid chromatography‐based pigment analyses. The reddish‐brown color of S. acuminata and yellowish‐green hue of S. ramonii were consistent with the quantitative differences determined in their pigment profiles. Our results indicate that the cell cycle is light‐controlled and that it differs in the two species. S‐phase was detected during the light period in both, whereas the G2/M phase occurred during the light period in S. ramonii but under dark conditions in S. acuminata. The detection of 4C stages, mobile zygotes (planozygotes), and resting cysts in S. ramonii (nonclonal) provided convincing evidence of sexuality in this species. Sexual related processes were not found in the clonal S. acuminata strain, suggesting its heterothallic behavior (i.e., the need for outcrossing). The differences in the genome size of these species were examined as well. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-07-05 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6771724/ /pubmed/31273941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23849 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fagín, Elena
Bravo, Isabel
Garrido, José Luis
Rodríguez, Francisco
Figueroa, Rosa I.
Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison
title Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison
title_full Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison
title_fullStr Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison
title_short Scrippsiella acuminata versus Scrippsiella ramonii: A Physiological Comparison
title_sort scrippsiella acuminata versus scrippsiella ramonii: a physiological comparison
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31273941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23849
work_keys_str_mv AT faginelena scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison
AT bravoisabel scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison
AT garridojoseluis scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison
AT rodriguezfrancisco scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison
AT figueroarosai scrippsiellaacuminataversusscrippsiellaramoniiaphysiologicalcomparison