Cargando…

Evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck

In foie gras production the technological yield after the cooking process is one of the main issues of processors as it is closely linked to the cooking melting rate. This rate is subjected to strict laws and regulations since it directly affects the organoleptic and technological qualities of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonnefont, Cécile M D, Molette, Caroline, Lavigne, Franck, Manse, Hélène, Bravo, Céline, Lo, Bara, Rémignon, Hervé, Arroyo, Julien, Bouillier-Oudot, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31347676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez359
_version_ 1783455762836619264
author Bonnefont, Cécile M D
Molette, Caroline
Lavigne, Franck
Manse, Hélène
Bravo, Céline
Lo, Bara
Rémignon, Hervé
Arroyo, Julien
Bouillier-Oudot, Michel
author_facet Bonnefont, Cécile M D
Molette, Caroline
Lavigne, Franck
Manse, Hélène
Bravo, Céline
Lo, Bara
Rémignon, Hervé
Arroyo, Julien
Bouillier-Oudot, Michel
author_sort Bonnefont, Cécile M D
collection PubMed
description In foie gras production the technological yield after the cooking process is one of the main issues of processors as it is closely linked to the cooking melting rate. This rate is subjected to strict laws and regulations since it directly affects the organoleptic and technological qualities of this gourmet product. The objective of the study was to better understand the liver fattening and the technological yield decrease during the overfeeding kinetics. A flock of 210 mule ducks was reared and then overfed during 12 D with 2 overfeeding programs; in the test group the amounts of corn in the first meals were higher than in the control group (+430 g during the whole period). Ducks were slaughtered at the end of the rearing period (D0, n = 15) and every other day (D2 to D12, n = 15 by group). Duck performances, anatomical dissections and physical and biochemical liver characteristics were registered. The performances were equivalent in the groups (P > 0.1). The evolution of the liver weight was then analyzed in detail in relation with the evolution of its biochemical composition. A two-step evolution occurred in the liver metabolism, first a main glycogen storage and then a strong lipid storage. A model to predict the liver weight was established with only BWs and feed intakes (R² = 0.83). The technological yield was determined on foie gras weighing more than 300 g (D6 to D12). The melting process was high during the last 2 D. The technological yield reached 72% at D12, for 758 g foie gras, and a strong negative correlation was observed with liver weight (−0.83; P < 0.001). A model to predict the technological yield was established with the liver weight and the liver color parameters (R² = 0.71). This study highlights the compromise between foie gras weight and its quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6771768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Poultry Science Association, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67717682019-10-07 Evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck Bonnefont, Cécile M D Molette, Caroline Lavigne, Franck Manse, Hélène Bravo, Céline Lo, Bara Rémignon, Hervé Arroyo, Julien Bouillier-Oudot, Michel Poult Sci Metabolism and Nutrition In foie gras production the technological yield after the cooking process is one of the main issues of processors as it is closely linked to the cooking melting rate. This rate is subjected to strict laws and regulations since it directly affects the organoleptic and technological qualities of this gourmet product. The objective of the study was to better understand the liver fattening and the technological yield decrease during the overfeeding kinetics. A flock of 210 mule ducks was reared and then overfed during 12 D with 2 overfeeding programs; in the test group the amounts of corn in the first meals were higher than in the control group (+430 g during the whole period). Ducks were slaughtered at the end of the rearing period (D0, n = 15) and every other day (D2 to D12, n = 15 by group). Duck performances, anatomical dissections and physical and biochemical liver characteristics were registered. The performances were equivalent in the groups (P > 0.1). The evolution of the liver weight was then analyzed in detail in relation with the evolution of its biochemical composition. A two-step evolution occurred in the liver metabolism, first a main glycogen storage and then a strong lipid storage. A model to predict the liver weight was established with only BWs and feed intakes (R² = 0.83). The technological yield was determined on foie gras weighing more than 300 g (D6 to D12). The melting process was high during the last 2 D. The technological yield reached 72% at D12, for 758 g foie gras, and a strong negative correlation was observed with liver weight (−0.83; P < 0.001). A model to predict the technological yield was established with the liver weight and the liver color parameters (R² = 0.71). This study highlights the compromise between foie gras weight and its quality. Poultry Science Association, Inc. 2019-11 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6771768/ /pubmed/31347676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez359 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Metabolism and Nutrition
Bonnefont, Cécile M D
Molette, Caroline
Lavigne, Franck
Manse, Hélène
Bravo, Céline
Lo, Bara
Rémignon, Hervé
Arroyo, Julien
Bouillier-Oudot, Michel
Evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck
title Evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck
title_full Evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck
title_fullStr Evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck
title_short Evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck
title_sort evolution of liver fattening and foie gras technological yield during the overfeeding period in mule duck
topic Metabolism and Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31347676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez359
work_keys_str_mv AT bonnefontcecilemd evolutionofliverfatteningandfoiegrastechnologicalyieldduringtheoverfeedingperiodinmuleduck
AT molettecaroline evolutionofliverfatteningandfoiegrastechnologicalyieldduringtheoverfeedingperiodinmuleduck
AT lavignefranck evolutionofliverfatteningandfoiegrastechnologicalyieldduringtheoverfeedingperiodinmuleduck
AT mansehelene evolutionofliverfatteningandfoiegrastechnologicalyieldduringtheoverfeedingperiodinmuleduck
AT bravoceline evolutionofliverfatteningandfoiegrastechnologicalyieldduringtheoverfeedingperiodinmuleduck
AT lobara evolutionofliverfatteningandfoiegrastechnologicalyieldduringtheoverfeedingperiodinmuleduck
AT remignonherve evolutionofliverfatteningandfoiegrastechnologicalyieldduringtheoverfeedingperiodinmuleduck
AT arroyojulien evolutionofliverfatteningandfoiegrastechnologicalyieldduringtheoverfeedingperiodinmuleduck
AT bouillieroudotmichel evolutionofliverfatteningandfoiegrastechnologicalyieldduringtheoverfeedingperiodinmuleduck