Cargando…

Peer‐supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review

CONTEXT: The use of peer support as a faculty development technique to improve clinical teaching is uncommon in medical education, despite the benefits of situating learning in the workplace. The authors therefore conducted a broad search seeking theoretical and empirical literature describing peer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, Narelle, Wozniak, Helen, Philip, Robyn L, Damarell, Raechel A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13896
_version_ 1783455803916681216
author Campbell, Narelle
Wozniak, Helen
Philip, Robyn L
Damarell, Raechel A
author_facet Campbell, Narelle
Wozniak, Helen
Philip, Robyn L
Damarell, Raechel A
author_sort Campbell, Narelle
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: The use of peer support as a faculty development technique to improve clinical teaching is uncommon in medical education, despite the benefits of situating learning in the workplace. The authors therefore conducted a broad search seeking theoretical and empirical literature describing peer support strategies for clinical teachers in health care workplaces. This included descriptive and non‐experimental studies that are often excluded from reviews. The review aimed to identify and assess existing initiatives and to synthesise key challenges and benefits. METHODS: An integrative literature review was undertaken (2004–2017), based on searches of eight international electronic databases and targeted manual searches. Key concepts, elements and models were mapped using an iterative, constant comparative method. An evaluative framework, drawing on previous research, informed conclusions regarding the quality of evidence. RESULTS: From a pool of 5735 papers, 34 met the inclusion criteria. The majority referred to studies conducted in the USA (59%) and in the medical profession (71%). Analysis revealed a trend towards using a collaborative model (56%), voluntary participation (59%), and direct workplace observation by a peer clinician (68%). Design features of the peer support strategy were commonly reported (65%), with half providing outcome measures (56%). Few papers reported on process evaluation (15%) or evidence of programme sustainability (15%). Despite logistical and time‐associated challenges, benefits accrued to individuals and the workplace, and included improved teaching practices. Embedding the peer support strategy into routine organisational practice proved effective. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that a workplace‐based peer support model is an acceptable and effective faculty development strategy for health care clinical teachers. Conceptualising workplace‐based peer support via a sociocultural model that acknowledges the significance of educational design, peers as collaborators and the importance of workplace context and culture is emphasised. Future research should focus on clarification studies informed by contemporary models of faculty development, in which factors impacting the health care workplace are considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6771963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67719632019-10-07 Peer‐supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review Campbell, Narelle Wozniak, Helen Philip, Robyn L Damarell, Raechel A Med Educ Medical Education in Reviews CONTEXT: The use of peer support as a faculty development technique to improve clinical teaching is uncommon in medical education, despite the benefits of situating learning in the workplace. The authors therefore conducted a broad search seeking theoretical and empirical literature describing peer support strategies for clinical teachers in health care workplaces. This included descriptive and non‐experimental studies that are often excluded from reviews. The review aimed to identify and assess existing initiatives and to synthesise key challenges and benefits. METHODS: An integrative literature review was undertaken (2004–2017), based on searches of eight international electronic databases and targeted manual searches. Key concepts, elements and models were mapped using an iterative, constant comparative method. An evaluative framework, drawing on previous research, informed conclusions regarding the quality of evidence. RESULTS: From a pool of 5735 papers, 34 met the inclusion criteria. The majority referred to studies conducted in the USA (59%) and in the medical profession (71%). Analysis revealed a trend towards using a collaborative model (56%), voluntary participation (59%), and direct workplace observation by a peer clinician (68%). Design features of the peer support strategy were commonly reported (65%), with half providing outcome measures (56%). Few papers reported on process evaluation (15%) or evidence of programme sustainability (15%). Despite logistical and time‐associated challenges, benefits accrued to individuals and the workplace, and included improved teaching practices. Embedding the peer support strategy into routine organisational practice proved effective. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that a workplace‐based peer support model is an acceptable and effective faculty development strategy for health care clinical teachers. Conceptualising workplace‐based peer support via a sociocultural model that acknowledges the significance of educational design, peers as collaborators and the importance of workplace context and culture is emphasised. Future research should focus on clarification studies informed by contemporary models of faculty development, in which factors impacting the health care workplace are considered. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-25 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6771963/ /pubmed/31238387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13896 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Education in Reviews
Campbell, Narelle
Wozniak, Helen
Philip, Robyn L
Damarell, Raechel A
Peer‐supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review
title Peer‐supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review
title_full Peer‐supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review
title_fullStr Peer‐supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Peer‐supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review
title_short Peer‐supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review
title_sort peer‐supported faculty development and workplace teaching: an integrative review
topic Medical Education in Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.13896
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellnarelle peersupportedfacultydevelopmentandworkplaceteachinganintegrativereview
AT wozniakhelen peersupportedfacultydevelopmentandworkplaceteachinganintegrativereview
AT philiprobynl peersupportedfacultydevelopmentandworkplaceteachinganintegrativereview
AT damarellraechela peersupportedfacultydevelopmentandworkplaceteachinganintegrativereview