Cargando…

Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs

Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence‐specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Anajane G., Pereira, Shalini, Jaramillo, Andrés, Stoll, Scott T., Khan, Faisal M., Berka, Noureddine, Mostafa, Ahmed A., Pando, Marcelo J., Usenko, Crystal Y., Bettinotti, Maria P., Pyo, Chul‐Woo, Nelson, Wyatt C., Willis, Amanda, Askar, Medhat, Geraghty, Daniel E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31237117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tan.13619
_version_ 1783455818984718336
author Smith, Anajane G.
Pereira, Shalini
Jaramillo, Andrés
Stoll, Scott T.
Khan, Faisal M.
Berka, Noureddine
Mostafa, Ahmed A.
Pando, Marcelo J.
Usenko, Crystal Y.
Bettinotti, Maria P.
Pyo, Chul‐Woo
Nelson, Wyatt C.
Willis, Amanda
Askar, Medhat
Geraghty, Daniel E.
author_facet Smith, Anajane G.
Pereira, Shalini
Jaramillo, Andrés
Stoll, Scott T.
Khan, Faisal M.
Berka, Noureddine
Mostafa, Ahmed A.
Pando, Marcelo J.
Usenko, Crystal Y.
Bettinotti, Maria P.
Pyo, Chul‐Woo
Nelson, Wyatt C.
Willis, Amanda
Askar, Medhat
Geraghty, Daniel E.
author_sort Smith, Anajane G.
collection PubMed
description Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence‐specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe (SSOP) technology is widely employed for higher volumes. When clinical need mandates high‐resolution data, Sanger sequencing‐based typing (SBT) has been the “gold standard.” However, all those methods commonly yield ambiguous typing results that utilize valuable laboratory resources when resolution is required. In solid organ transplantation, high‐resolution typing may provide critical information for highly sensitized patients with donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), particularly when DSA involve HLA alleles not discriminated by SSOP typing. Arguments against routine use of SBT include assay complexity, long turnaround times (TAT), and increased costs. Here, we compare a next generation sequencing (NGS) technology with SSOP for accuracy, effort, turnaround time, and level of resolution for genotyping of 11 HLA loci among 289 specimens from five clinical laboratories. Results were concordant except for SSOP misassignments in eight specimens and 21 novel sequences uniquely identified by NGS. With few exceptions, SSOP generated ambiguous results while NGS provided unambiguous three‐field allele assignments. For complete HLA genotyping of up to 24 samples by either SSOP or NGS, bench work was completed on day 1 and typing results were available on day 2. This study provides compelling evidence that, although not viable for STAT typing of deceased donors, a single‐pass NGS HLA typing method has direct application for solid organ transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6772026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67720262019-10-07 Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs Smith, Anajane G. Pereira, Shalini Jaramillo, Andrés Stoll, Scott T. Khan, Faisal M. Berka, Noureddine Mostafa, Ahmed A. Pando, Marcelo J. Usenko, Crystal Y. Bettinotti, Maria P. Pyo, Chul‐Woo Nelson, Wyatt C. Willis, Amanda Askar, Medhat Geraghty, Daniel E. HLA Original Articles Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence‐specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe (SSOP) technology is widely employed for higher volumes. When clinical need mandates high‐resolution data, Sanger sequencing‐based typing (SBT) has been the “gold standard.” However, all those methods commonly yield ambiguous typing results that utilize valuable laboratory resources when resolution is required. In solid organ transplantation, high‐resolution typing may provide critical information for highly sensitized patients with donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), particularly when DSA involve HLA alleles not discriminated by SSOP typing. Arguments against routine use of SBT include assay complexity, long turnaround times (TAT), and increased costs. Here, we compare a next generation sequencing (NGS) technology with SSOP for accuracy, effort, turnaround time, and level of resolution for genotyping of 11 HLA loci among 289 specimens from five clinical laboratories. Results were concordant except for SSOP misassignments in eight specimens and 21 novel sequences uniquely identified by NGS. With few exceptions, SSOP generated ambiguous results while NGS provided unambiguous three‐field allele assignments. For complete HLA genotyping of up to 24 samples by either SSOP or NGS, bench work was completed on day 1 and typing results were available on day 2. This study provides compelling evidence that, although not viable for STAT typing of deceased donors, a single‐pass NGS HLA typing method has direct application for solid organ transplantation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-07-15 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6772026/ /pubmed/31237117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tan.13619 Text en © 2019 The Authors. HLA: Immune Response Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Smith, Anajane G.
Pereira, Shalini
Jaramillo, Andrés
Stoll, Scott T.
Khan, Faisal M.
Berka, Noureddine
Mostafa, Ahmed A.
Pando, Marcelo J.
Usenko, Crystal Y.
Bettinotti, Maria P.
Pyo, Chul‐Woo
Nelson, Wyatt C.
Willis, Amanda
Askar, Medhat
Geraghty, Daniel E.
Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs
title Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs
title_full Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs
title_fullStr Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs
title_short Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs
title_sort comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for hla‐a, b, c, drb1, drb3/b4/b5, dqa1, dqb1, dpa1, and dpb1 typing: toward single‐pass high‐resolution hla typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31237117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tan.13619
work_keys_str_mv AT smithanajaneg comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT pereirashalini comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT jaramilloandres comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT stollscottt comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT khanfaisalm comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT berkanoureddine comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT mostafaahmeda comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT pandomarceloj comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT usenkocrystaly comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT bettinottimariap comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT pyochulwoo comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT nelsonwyattc comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT willisamanda comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT askarmedhat comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms
AT geraghtydaniele comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms