Cargando…
Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs
Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence‐specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31237117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tan.13619 |
_version_ | 1783455818984718336 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Anajane G. Pereira, Shalini Jaramillo, Andrés Stoll, Scott T. Khan, Faisal M. Berka, Noureddine Mostafa, Ahmed A. Pando, Marcelo J. Usenko, Crystal Y. Bettinotti, Maria P. Pyo, Chul‐Woo Nelson, Wyatt C. Willis, Amanda Askar, Medhat Geraghty, Daniel E. |
author_facet | Smith, Anajane G. Pereira, Shalini Jaramillo, Andrés Stoll, Scott T. Khan, Faisal M. Berka, Noureddine Mostafa, Ahmed A. Pando, Marcelo J. Usenko, Crystal Y. Bettinotti, Maria P. Pyo, Chul‐Woo Nelson, Wyatt C. Willis, Amanda Askar, Medhat Geraghty, Daniel E. |
author_sort | Smith, Anajane G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence‐specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe (SSOP) technology is widely employed for higher volumes. When clinical need mandates high‐resolution data, Sanger sequencing‐based typing (SBT) has been the “gold standard.” However, all those methods commonly yield ambiguous typing results that utilize valuable laboratory resources when resolution is required. In solid organ transplantation, high‐resolution typing may provide critical information for highly sensitized patients with donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), particularly when DSA involve HLA alleles not discriminated by SSOP typing. Arguments against routine use of SBT include assay complexity, long turnaround times (TAT), and increased costs. Here, we compare a next generation sequencing (NGS) technology with SSOP for accuracy, effort, turnaround time, and level of resolution for genotyping of 11 HLA loci among 289 specimens from five clinical laboratories. Results were concordant except for SSOP misassignments in eight specimens and 21 novel sequences uniquely identified by NGS. With few exceptions, SSOP generated ambiguous results while NGS provided unambiguous three‐field allele assignments. For complete HLA genotyping of up to 24 samples by either SSOP or NGS, bench work was completed on day 1 and typing results were available on day 2. This study provides compelling evidence that, although not viable for STAT typing of deceased donors, a single‐pass NGS HLA typing method has direct application for solid organ transplantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6772026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67720262019-10-07 Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs Smith, Anajane G. Pereira, Shalini Jaramillo, Andrés Stoll, Scott T. Khan, Faisal M. Berka, Noureddine Mostafa, Ahmed A. Pando, Marcelo J. Usenko, Crystal Y. Bettinotti, Maria P. Pyo, Chul‐Woo Nelson, Wyatt C. Willis, Amanda Askar, Medhat Geraghty, Daniel E. HLA Original Articles Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence‐specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe (SSOP) technology is widely employed for higher volumes. When clinical need mandates high‐resolution data, Sanger sequencing‐based typing (SBT) has been the “gold standard.” However, all those methods commonly yield ambiguous typing results that utilize valuable laboratory resources when resolution is required. In solid organ transplantation, high‐resolution typing may provide critical information for highly sensitized patients with donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), particularly when DSA involve HLA alleles not discriminated by SSOP typing. Arguments against routine use of SBT include assay complexity, long turnaround times (TAT), and increased costs. Here, we compare a next generation sequencing (NGS) technology with SSOP for accuracy, effort, turnaround time, and level of resolution for genotyping of 11 HLA loci among 289 specimens from five clinical laboratories. Results were concordant except for SSOP misassignments in eight specimens and 21 novel sequences uniquely identified by NGS. With few exceptions, SSOP generated ambiguous results while NGS provided unambiguous three‐field allele assignments. For complete HLA genotyping of up to 24 samples by either SSOP or NGS, bench work was completed on day 1 and typing results were available on day 2. This study provides compelling evidence that, although not viable for STAT typing of deceased donors, a single‐pass NGS HLA typing method has direct application for solid organ transplantation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-07-15 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6772026/ /pubmed/31237117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tan.13619 Text en © 2019 The Authors. HLA: Immune Response Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Smith, Anajane G. Pereira, Shalini Jaramillo, Andrés Stoll, Scott T. Khan, Faisal M. Berka, Noureddine Mostafa, Ahmed A. Pando, Marcelo J. Usenko, Crystal Y. Bettinotti, Maria P. Pyo, Chul‐Woo Nelson, Wyatt C. Willis, Amanda Askar, Medhat Geraghty, Daniel E. Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs |
title | Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs |
title_full | Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs |
title_fullStr | Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs |
title_short | Comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA‐A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single‐pass high‐resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs |
title_sort | comparison of sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for hla‐a, b, c, drb1, drb3/b4/b5, dqa1, dqb1, dpa1, and dpb1 typing: toward single‐pass high‐resolution hla typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31237117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tan.13619 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithanajaneg comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT pereirashalini comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT jaramilloandres comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT stollscottt comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT khanfaisalm comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT berkanoureddine comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT mostafaahmeda comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT pandomarceloj comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT usenkocrystaly comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT bettinottimariap comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT pyochulwoo comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT nelsonwyattc comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT willisamanda comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT askarmedhat comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms AT geraghtydaniele comparisonofsequencespecificoligonucleotideprobevsnextgenerationsequencingforhlaabcdrb1drb3b4b5dqa1dqb1dpa1anddpb1typingtowardsinglepasshighresolutionhlatypinginsupportofsolidorganandhematopoieticcelltransplantprograms |