Cargando…

Testing Mediators of Youth Intervention Outcomes Using Single‐Case Experimental Designs

The major aim of this manuscript is to bring together two important topics that have recently received much attention in child and adolescent research, albeit separately from each other: single‐case experimental designs and statistical mediation analysis. Single‐case experimental designs (SCEDs) are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geuke, Gemma G. M., Maric, Marija, Miočević, Milica, Wolters, Lidewij H., de Haan, Else
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20310
_version_ 1783455827984646144
author Geuke, Gemma G. M.
Maric, Marija
Miočević, Milica
Wolters, Lidewij H.
de Haan, Else
author_facet Geuke, Gemma G. M.
Maric, Marija
Miočević, Milica
Wolters, Lidewij H.
de Haan, Else
author_sort Geuke, Gemma G. M.
collection PubMed
description The major aim of this manuscript is to bring together two important topics that have recently received much attention in child and adolescent research, albeit separately from each other: single‐case experimental designs and statistical mediation analysis. Single‐case experimental designs (SCEDs) are increasingly recognized as a valuable alternative for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to test intervention effects in youth populations. Statistical mediation analysis helps provide understanding about the most potent mechanisms of change underlying youth intervention outcomes. In this manuscript we: (i) describe the conceptual framework and outline desiderata for methods for mediation analysis in SCEDs; (ii) describe the main aspects of several data‐analytic techniques potentially useful to test mediation in SCEDs; (iii) apply these methods to a single‐case treatment data set from one clinically anxious client; and (iv) discuss pros and cons of these methods for testing mediation in SCEDs, and provide future directions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6772063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67720632019-10-07 Testing Mediators of Youth Intervention Outcomes Using Single‐Case Experimental Designs Geuke, Gemma G. M. Maric, Marija Miočević, Milica Wolters, Lidewij H. de Haan, Else New Dir Child Adolesc Dev Reviews The major aim of this manuscript is to bring together two important topics that have recently received much attention in child and adolescent research, albeit separately from each other: single‐case experimental designs and statistical mediation analysis. Single‐case experimental designs (SCEDs) are increasingly recognized as a valuable alternative for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to test intervention effects in youth populations. Statistical mediation analysis helps provide understanding about the most potent mechanisms of change underlying youth intervention outcomes. In this manuscript we: (i) describe the conceptual framework and outline desiderata for methods for mediation analysis in SCEDs; (ii) describe the main aspects of several data‐analytic techniques potentially useful to test mediation in SCEDs; (iii) apply these methods to a single‐case treatment data set from one clinically anxious client; and (iv) discuss pros and cons of these methods for testing mediation in SCEDs, and provide future directions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-11 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6772063/ /pubmed/31507070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20310 Text en © 2019 The Authors. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Geuke, Gemma G. M.
Maric, Marija
Miočević, Milica
Wolters, Lidewij H.
de Haan, Else
Testing Mediators of Youth Intervention Outcomes Using Single‐Case Experimental Designs
title Testing Mediators of Youth Intervention Outcomes Using Single‐Case Experimental Designs
title_full Testing Mediators of Youth Intervention Outcomes Using Single‐Case Experimental Designs
title_fullStr Testing Mediators of Youth Intervention Outcomes Using Single‐Case Experimental Designs
title_full_unstemmed Testing Mediators of Youth Intervention Outcomes Using Single‐Case Experimental Designs
title_short Testing Mediators of Youth Intervention Outcomes Using Single‐Case Experimental Designs
title_sort testing mediators of youth intervention outcomes using single‐case experimental designs
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20310
work_keys_str_mv AT geukegemmagm testingmediatorsofyouthinterventionoutcomesusingsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns
AT maricmarija testingmediatorsofyouthinterventionoutcomesusingsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns
AT miocevicmilica testingmediatorsofyouthinterventionoutcomesusingsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns
AT wolterslidewijh testingmediatorsofyouthinterventionoutcomesusingsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns
AT dehaanelse testingmediatorsofyouthinterventionoutcomesusingsinglecaseexperimentaldesigns