Cargando…
Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays
Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have reached sensitivity levels that make them viable portable alternatives to traditional superconducting technology for magnetoencephalography (MEG). OPMs do not require cryogenic cooling and can therefore be placed directly on the scalp surface. Unlike cryoge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24707 |
_version_ | 1783455828209041408 |
---|---|
author | Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo Tierney, Tim M. Meyer, Sofie S. Boto, Elena Holmes, Niall Roberts, Gillian Leggett, James Vargas‐Bonilla, J. F. Bowtell, Richard Brookes, Matthew J. López, Jose D. Barnes, Gareth R. |
author_facet | Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo Tierney, Tim M. Meyer, Sofie S. Boto, Elena Holmes, Niall Roberts, Gillian Leggett, James Vargas‐Bonilla, J. F. Bowtell, Richard Brookes, Matthew J. López, Jose D. Barnes, Gareth R. |
author_sort | Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have reached sensitivity levels that make them viable portable alternatives to traditional superconducting technology for magnetoencephalography (MEG). OPMs do not require cryogenic cooling and can therefore be placed directly on the scalp surface. Unlike cryogenic systems, based on a well‐characterised fixed arrays essentially linear in applied flux, OPM devices, based on different physical principles, present new modelling challenges. Here, we outline an empirical Bayesian framework that can be used to compare between and optimise sensor arrays. We perturb the sensor geometry (via simulation) and with analytic model comparison methods estimate the true sensor geometry. The width of these perturbation curves allows us to compare different MEG systems. We test this technique using simulated and real data from SQUID and OPM recordings using head‐casts and scanner‐casts. Finally, we show that given knowledge of underlying brain anatomy, it is possible to estimate the true sensor geometry from the OPM data themselves using a model comparison framework. This implies that the requirement for accurate knowledge of the sensor positions and orientations a priori may be relaxed. As this procedure uses the cortical manifold as spatial support there is no co‐registration procedure or reliance on scalp landmarks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6772064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67720642019-10-07 Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo Tierney, Tim M. Meyer, Sofie S. Boto, Elena Holmes, Niall Roberts, Gillian Leggett, James Vargas‐Bonilla, J. F. Bowtell, Richard Brookes, Matthew J. López, Jose D. Barnes, Gareth R. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have reached sensitivity levels that make them viable portable alternatives to traditional superconducting technology for magnetoencephalography (MEG). OPMs do not require cryogenic cooling and can therefore be placed directly on the scalp surface. Unlike cryogenic systems, based on a well‐characterised fixed arrays essentially linear in applied flux, OPM devices, based on different physical principles, present new modelling challenges. Here, we outline an empirical Bayesian framework that can be used to compare between and optimise sensor arrays. We perturb the sensor geometry (via simulation) and with analytic model comparison methods estimate the true sensor geometry. The width of these perturbation curves allows us to compare different MEG systems. We test this technique using simulated and real data from SQUID and OPM recordings using head‐casts and scanner‐casts. Finally, we show that given knowledge of underlying brain anatomy, it is possible to estimate the true sensor geometry from the OPM data themselves using a model comparison framework. This implies that the requirement for accurate knowledge of the sensor positions and orientations a priori may be relaxed. As this procedure uses the cortical manifold as spatial support there is no co‐registration procedure or reliance on scalp landmarks. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6772064/ /pubmed/31294909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24707 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo Tierney, Tim M. Meyer, Sofie S. Boto, Elena Holmes, Niall Roberts, Gillian Leggett, James Vargas‐Bonilla, J. F. Bowtell, Richard Brookes, Matthew J. López, Jose D. Barnes, Gareth R. Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays |
title | Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays |
title_full | Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays |
title_fullStr | Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays |
title_full_unstemmed | Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays |
title_short | Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays |
title_sort | data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24707 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duquemunozleonardo datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT tierneytimm datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT meyersofies datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT botoelena datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT holmesniall datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT robertsgillian datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT leggettjames datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT vargasbonillajf datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT bowtellrichard datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT brookesmatthewj datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT lopezjosed datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays AT barnesgarethr datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays |