Cargando…

Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays

Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have reached sensitivity levels that make them viable portable alternatives to traditional superconducting technology for magnetoencephalography (MEG). OPMs do not require cryogenic cooling and can therefore be placed directly on the scalp surface. Unlike cryoge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo, Tierney, Tim M., Meyer, Sofie S., Boto, Elena, Holmes, Niall, Roberts, Gillian, Leggett, James, Vargas‐Bonilla, J. F., Bowtell, Richard, Brookes, Matthew J., López, Jose D., Barnes, Gareth R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24707
_version_ 1783455828209041408
author Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo
Tierney, Tim M.
Meyer, Sofie S.
Boto, Elena
Holmes, Niall
Roberts, Gillian
Leggett, James
Vargas‐Bonilla, J. F.
Bowtell, Richard
Brookes, Matthew J.
López, Jose D.
Barnes, Gareth R.
author_facet Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo
Tierney, Tim M.
Meyer, Sofie S.
Boto, Elena
Holmes, Niall
Roberts, Gillian
Leggett, James
Vargas‐Bonilla, J. F.
Bowtell, Richard
Brookes, Matthew J.
López, Jose D.
Barnes, Gareth R.
author_sort Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have reached sensitivity levels that make them viable portable alternatives to traditional superconducting technology for magnetoencephalography (MEG). OPMs do not require cryogenic cooling and can therefore be placed directly on the scalp surface. Unlike cryogenic systems, based on a well‐characterised fixed arrays essentially linear in applied flux, OPM devices, based on different physical principles, present new modelling challenges. Here, we outline an empirical Bayesian framework that can be used to compare between and optimise sensor arrays. We perturb the sensor geometry (via simulation) and with analytic model comparison methods estimate the true sensor geometry. The width of these perturbation curves allows us to compare different MEG systems. We test this technique using simulated and real data from SQUID and OPM recordings using head‐casts and scanner‐casts. Finally, we show that given knowledge of underlying brain anatomy, it is possible to estimate the true sensor geometry from the OPM data themselves using a model comparison framework. This implies that the requirement for accurate knowledge of the sensor positions and orientations a priori may be relaxed. As this procedure uses the cortical manifold as spatial support there is no co‐registration procedure or reliance on scalp landmarks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6772064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67720642019-10-07 Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo Tierney, Tim M. Meyer, Sofie S. Boto, Elena Holmes, Niall Roberts, Gillian Leggett, James Vargas‐Bonilla, J. F. Bowtell, Richard Brookes, Matthew J. López, Jose D. Barnes, Gareth R. Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have reached sensitivity levels that make them viable portable alternatives to traditional superconducting technology for magnetoencephalography (MEG). OPMs do not require cryogenic cooling and can therefore be placed directly on the scalp surface. Unlike cryogenic systems, based on a well‐characterised fixed arrays essentially linear in applied flux, OPM devices, based on different physical principles, present new modelling challenges. Here, we outline an empirical Bayesian framework that can be used to compare between and optimise sensor arrays. We perturb the sensor geometry (via simulation) and with analytic model comparison methods estimate the true sensor geometry. The width of these perturbation curves allows us to compare different MEG systems. We test this technique using simulated and real data from SQUID and OPM recordings using head‐casts and scanner‐casts. Finally, we show that given knowledge of underlying brain anatomy, it is possible to estimate the true sensor geometry from the OPM data themselves using a model comparison framework. This implies that the requirement for accurate knowledge of the sensor positions and orientations a priori may be relaxed. As this procedure uses the cortical manifold as spatial support there is no co‐registration procedure or reliance on scalp landmarks. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6772064/ /pubmed/31294909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24707 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Duque‐Muñoz, Leonardo
Tierney, Tim M.
Meyer, Sofie S.
Boto, Elena
Holmes, Niall
Roberts, Gillian
Leggett, James
Vargas‐Bonilla, J. F.
Bowtell, Richard
Brookes, Matthew J.
López, Jose D.
Barnes, Gareth R.
Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays
title Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays
title_full Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays
title_fullStr Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays
title_full_unstemmed Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays
title_short Data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays
title_sort data‐driven model optimization for optically pumped magnetometer sensor arrays
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24707
work_keys_str_mv AT duquemunozleonardo datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT tierneytimm datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT meyersofies datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT botoelena datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT holmesniall datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT robertsgillian datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT leggettjames datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT vargasbonillajf datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT bowtellrichard datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT brookesmatthewj datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT lopezjosed datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays
AT barnesgarethr datadrivenmodeloptimizationforopticallypumpedmagnetometersensorarrays