Cargando…
Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression
BACKGROUND: Because most pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) will never become malignant, currently advocated long‐term surveillance is low‐yield for most individuals. AIM: To develop a score chart identifying IPMNs at lowest risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31429105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15440 |
_version_ | 1783455848425586688 |
---|---|
author | Overbeek, Kasper A. Alblas, Maaike Gausman, Valerie Kandel, Pujan Schweber, Adam B. Brooks, Christian Van Riet, Priscilla A. Wallace, Michael B. Gonda, Tamas A. Cahen, Djuna L. Bruno, Marco J. |
author_facet | Overbeek, Kasper A. Alblas, Maaike Gausman, Valerie Kandel, Pujan Schweber, Adam B. Brooks, Christian Van Riet, Priscilla A. Wallace, Michael B. Gonda, Tamas A. Cahen, Djuna L. Bruno, Marco J. |
author_sort | Overbeek, Kasper A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Because most pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) will never become malignant, currently advocated long‐term surveillance is low‐yield for most individuals. AIM: To develop a score chart identifying IPMNs at lowest risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. METHODS: We combined prospectively maintained pancreatic cyst surveillance databases of three academic institutions. Patients were included if they had a presumed side‐branch IPMN, without worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata at baseline (as defined by the 2012 international Fukuoka guidelines), and were followed ≥ 12 months. The endpoint was development of one or more worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata during follow‐up. We created a multivariable prediction model using Cox‐proportional logistic regression analysis and performed an internal‐external validation. RESULTS: 875 patients were included. After a mean follow‐up of 50 months (range 12‐157), 116 (13%) patients developed worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. The final model included cyst size (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09‐1.15), cyst multifocality (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01‐2.18), ever having smoked (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.95‐2.04), history of acute pancreatitis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.21‐3.55), and history of extrapancreatic malignancy (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.91‐1.97). After validation, the model had good discriminative ability (C‐statistic 0.72 in the Mayo cohort, 0.71 in the Columbia cohort, 0.64 in the Erasmus cohort). CONCLUSION: In presumed side branch IPMNs without worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata at baseline, the Dutch‐American Risk stratification Tool (DART‐1) successfully identifies pancreatic lesions at low risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6772152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67721522019-10-07 Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression Overbeek, Kasper A. Alblas, Maaike Gausman, Valerie Kandel, Pujan Schweber, Adam B. Brooks, Christian Van Riet, Priscilla A. Wallace, Michael B. Gonda, Tamas A. Cahen, Djuna L. Bruno, Marco J. Aliment Pharmacol Ther Identifying Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms at Low Risk of Progression BACKGROUND: Because most pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) will never become malignant, currently advocated long‐term surveillance is low‐yield for most individuals. AIM: To develop a score chart identifying IPMNs at lowest risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. METHODS: We combined prospectively maintained pancreatic cyst surveillance databases of three academic institutions. Patients were included if they had a presumed side‐branch IPMN, without worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata at baseline (as defined by the 2012 international Fukuoka guidelines), and were followed ≥ 12 months. The endpoint was development of one or more worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata during follow‐up. We created a multivariable prediction model using Cox‐proportional logistic regression analysis and performed an internal‐external validation. RESULTS: 875 patients were included. After a mean follow‐up of 50 months (range 12‐157), 116 (13%) patients developed worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. The final model included cyst size (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09‐1.15), cyst multifocality (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01‐2.18), ever having smoked (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.95‐2.04), history of acute pancreatitis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.21‐3.55), and history of extrapancreatic malignancy (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.91‐1.97). After validation, the model had good discriminative ability (C‐statistic 0.72 in the Mayo cohort, 0.71 in the Columbia cohort, 0.64 in the Erasmus cohort). CONCLUSION: In presumed side branch IPMNs without worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata at baseline, the Dutch‐American Risk stratification Tool (DART‐1) successfully identifies pancreatic lesions at low risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-19 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6772152/ /pubmed/31429105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15440 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Identifying Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms at Low Risk of Progression Overbeek, Kasper A. Alblas, Maaike Gausman, Valerie Kandel, Pujan Schweber, Adam B. Brooks, Christian Van Riet, Priscilla A. Wallace, Michael B. Gonda, Tamas A. Cahen, Djuna L. Bruno, Marco J. Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression |
title | Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression |
title_full | Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression |
title_fullStr | Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression |
title_short | Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression |
title_sort | development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression |
topic | Identifying Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms at Low Risk of Progression |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31429105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT overbeekkaspera developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT alblasmaaike developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT gausmanvalerie developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT kandelpujan developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT schweberadamb developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT brookschristian developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT vanrietpriscillaa developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT wallacemichaelb developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT gondatamasa developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT cahendjunal developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression AT brunomarcoj developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression |