Cargando…

Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression

BACKGROUND: Because most pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) will never become malignant, currently advocated long‐term surveillance is low‐yield for most individuals. AIM: To develop a score chart identifying IPMNs at lowest risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Overbeek, Kasper A., Alblas, Maaike, Gausman, Valerie, Kandel, Pujan, Schweber, Adam B., Brooks, Christian, Van Riet, Priscilla A., Wallace, Michael B., Gonda, Tamas A., Cahen, Djuna L., Bruno, Marco J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31429105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15440
_version_ 1783455848425586688
author Overbeek, Kasper A.
Alblas, Maaike
Gausman, Valerie
Kandel, Pujan
Schweber, Adam B.
Brooks, Christian
Van Riet, Priscilla A.
Wallace, Michael B.
Gonda, Tamas A.
Cahen, Djuna L.
Bruno, Marco J.
author_facet Overbeek, Kasper A.
Alblas, Maaike
Gausman, Valerie
Kandel, Pujan
Schweber, Adam B.
Brooks, Christian
Van Riet, Priscilla A.
Wallace, Michael B.
Gonda, Tamas A.
Cahen, Djuna L.
Bruno, Marco J.
author_sort Overbeek, Kasper A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Because most pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) will never become malignant, currently advocated long‐term surveillance is low‐yield for most individuals. AIM: To develop a score chart identifying IPMNs at lowest risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. METHODS: We combined prospectively maintained pancreatic cyst surveillance databases of three academic institutions. Patients were included if they had a presumed side‐branch IPMN, without worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata at baseline (as defined by the 2012 international Fukuoka guidelines), and were followed ≥ 12 months. The endpoint was development of one or more worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata during follow‐up. We created a multivariable prediction model using Cox‐proportional logistic regression analysis and performed an internal‐external validation. RESULTS: 875 patients were included. After a mean follow‐up of 50 months (range 12‐157), 116 (13%) patients developed worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. The final model included cyst size (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09‐1.15), cyst multifocality (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01‐2.18), ever having smoked (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.95‐2.04), history of acute pancreatitis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.21‐3.55), and history of extrapancreatic malignancy (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.91‐1.97). After validation, the model had good discriminative ability (C‐statistic 0.72 in the Mayo cohort, 0.71 in the Columbia cohort, 0.64 in the Erasmus cohort). CONCLUSION: In presumed side branch IPMNs without worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata at baseline, the Dutch‐American Risk stratification Tool (DART‐1) successfully identifies pancreatic lesions at low risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6772152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67721522019-10-07 Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression Overbeek, Kasper A. Alblas, Maaike Gausman, Valerie Kandel, Pujan Schweber, Adam B. Brooks, Christian Van Riet, Priscilla A. Wallace, Michael B. Gonda, Tamas A. Cahen, Djuna L. Bruno, Marco J. Aliment Pharmacol Ther Identifying Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms at Low Risk of Progression BACKGROUND: Because most pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) will never become malignant, currently advocated long‐term surveillance is low‐yield for most individuals. AIM: To develop a score chart identifying IPMNs at lowest risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. METHODS: We combined prospectively maintained pancreatic cyst surveillance databases of three academic institutions. Patients were included if they had a presumed side‐branch IPMN, without worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata at baseline (as defined by the 2012 international Fukuoka guidelines), and were followed ≥ 12 months. The endpoint was development of one or more worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata during follow‐up. We created a multivariable prediction model using Cox‐proportional logistic regression analysis and performed an internal‐external validation. RESULTS: 875 patients were included. After a mean follow‐up of 50 months (range 12‐157), 116 (13%) patients developed worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. The final model included cyst size (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09‐1.15), cyst multifocality (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01‐2.18), ever having smoked (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.95‐2.04), history of acute pancreatitis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.21‐3.55), and history of extrapancreatic malignancy (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.91‐1.97). After validation, the model had good discriminative ability (C‐statistic 0.72 in the Mayo cohort, 0.71 in the Columbia cohort, 0.64 in the Erasmus cohort). CONCLUSION: In presumed side branch IPMNs without worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata at baseline, the Dutch‐American Risk stratification Tool (DART‐1) successfully identifies pancreatic lesions at low risk of developing worrisome features or high‐risk stigmata. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-19 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6772152/ /pubmed/31429105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15440 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Identifying Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms at Low Risk of Progression
Overbeek, Kasper A.
Alblas, Maaike
Gausman, Valerie
Kandel, Pujan
Schweber, Adam B.
Brooks, Christian
Van Riet, Priscilla A.
Wallace, Michael B.
Gonda, Tamas A.
Cahen, Djuna L.
Bruno, Marco J.
Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression
title Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression
title_full Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression
title_fullStr Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression
title_full_unstemmed Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression
title_short Development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression
title_sort development of a stratification tool to identify pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms at lowest risk of progression
topic Identifying Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms at Low Risk of Progression
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31429105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.15440
work_keys_str_mv AT overbeekkaspera developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT alblasmaaike developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT gausmanvalerie developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT kandelpujan developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT schweberadamb developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT brookschristian developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT vanrietpriscillaa developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT wallacemichaelb developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT gondatamasa developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT cahendjunal developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression
AT brunomarcoj developmentofastratificationtooltoidentifypancreaticintraductalpapillarymucinousneoplasmsatlowestriskofprogression