Cargando…

Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments

ChildFund International (ChildFund) is a child‐focused International Non‐Governmental Organization (INGO) which, since 1938, has worked with local implementing partners (LIPs), government, and other partner organizations to help create the safe environments children need to thrive. The purpose of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strouse, Darcy L., Moore, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20315
_version_ 1783455852218286080
author Strouse, Darcy L.
Moore, Kathryn
author_facet Strouse, Darcy L.
Moore, Kathryn
author_sort Strouse, Darcy L.
collection PubMed
description ChildFund International (ChildFund) is a child‐focused International Non‐Governmental Organization (INGO) which, since 1938, has worked with local implementing partners (LIPs), government, and other partner organizations to help create the safe environments children need to thrive. The purpose of this commentary is to reflect on the utility and possible application of the suggestions and study designs in this special issue to real‐life intervention studies in dynamic context settings. The commentary provides three regional case examples with evaluation study lessons learned from ChildFund's global evaluation work. Specific insights from this issue are discussed regarding their application to effectiveness studies for projects delivered by a child‐focused INGO, like ChildFund, in resource‐limited settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6772167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67721672019-10-07 Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments Strouse, Darcy L. Moore, Kathryn New Dir Child Adolesc Dev Opinion ChildFund International (ChildFund) is a child‐focused International Non‐Governmental Organization (INGO) which, since 1938, has worked with local implementing partners (LIPs), government, and other partner organizations to help create the safe environments children need to thrive. The purpose of this commentary is to reflect on the utility and possible application of the suggestions and study designs in this special issue to real‐life intervention studies in dynamic context settings. The commentary provides three regional case examples with evaluation study lessons learned from ChildFund's global evaluation work. Specific insights from this issue are discussed regarding their application to effectiveness studies for projects delivered by a child‐focused INGO, like ChildFund, in resource‐limited settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-11 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6772167/ /pubmed/31507038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20315 Text en © 2019 The Authors. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Opinion
Strouse, Darcy L.
Moore, Kathryn
Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments
title Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments
title_full Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments
title_fullStr Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments
title_full_unstemmed Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments
title_short Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments
title_sort commentary: contextualizing alternatives to rcts: measuring the impact of a non‐governmental sponsorship organization's projects to strengthen children's supportive environments
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20315
work_keys_str_mv AT strousedarcyl commentarycontextualizingalternativestorctsmeasuringtheimpactofanongovernmentalsponsorshiporganizationsprojectstostrengthenchildrenssupportiveenvironments
AT moorekathryn commentarycontextualizingalternativestorctsmeasuringtheimpactofanongovernmentalsponsorshiporganizationsprojectstostrengthenchildrenssupportiveenvironments