Cargando…
Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments
ChildFund International (ChildFund) is a child‐focused International Non‐Governmental Organization (INGO) which, since 1938, has worked with local implementing partners (LIPs), government, and other partner organizations to help create the safe environments children need to thrive. The purpose of th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20315 |
_version_ | 1783455852218286080 |
---|---|
author | Strouse, Darcy L. Moore, Kathryn |
author_facet | Strouse, Darcy L. Moore, Kathryn |
author_sort | Strouse, Darcy L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ChildFund International (ChildFund) is a child‐focused International Non‐Governmental Organization (INGO) which, since 1938, has worked with local implementing partners (LIPs), government, and other partner organizations to help create the safe environments children need to thrive. The purpose of this commentary is to reflect on the utility and possible application of the suggestions and study designs in this special issue to real‐life intervention studies in dynamic context settings. The commentary provides three regional case examples with evaluation study lessons learned from ChildFund's global evaluation work. Specific insights from this issue are discussed regarding their application to effectiveness studies for projects delivered by a child‐focused INGO, like ChildFund, in resource‐limited settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6772167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67721672019-10-07 Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments Strouse, Darcy L. Moore, Kathryn New Dir Child Adolesc Dev Opinion ChildFund International (ChildFund) is a child‐focused International Non‐Governmental Organization (INGO) which, since 1938, has worked with local implementing partners (LIPs), government, and other partner organizations to help create the safe environments children need to thrive. The purpose of this commentary is to reflect on the utility and possible application of the suggestions and study designs in this special issue to real‐life intervention studies in dynamic context settings. The commentary provides three regional case examples with evaluation study lessons learned from ChildFund's global evaluation work. Specific insights from this issue are discussed regarding their application to effectiveness studies for projects delivered by a child‐focused INGO, like ChildFund, in resource‐limited settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-11 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6772167/ /pubmed/31507038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20315 Text en © 2019 The Authors. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Opinion Strouse, Darcy L. Moore, Kathryn Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments |
title | Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments |
title_full | Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments |
title_fullStr | Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments |
title_full_unstemmed | Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments |
title_short | Commentary: Contextualizing Alternatives to RCTs: Measuring the Impact of a Non‐Governmental Sponsorship Organization's Projects to Strengthen Children's Supportive Environments |
title_sort | commentary: contextualizing alternatives to rcts: measuring the impact of a non‐governmental sponsorship organization's projects to strengthen children's supportive environments |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31507038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20315 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strousedarcyl commentarycontextualizingalternativestorctsmeasuringtheimpactofanongovernmentalsponsorshiporganizationsprojectstostrengthenchildrenssupportiveenvironments AT moorekathryn commentarycontextualizingalternativestorctsmeasuringtheimpactofanongovernmentalsponsorshiporganizationsprojectstostrengthenchildrenssupportiveenvironments |