Cargando…

Active head motion reduction in magnetic resonance imaging using tactile feedback

Head motion is a common problem in clinical as well as empirical (functional) magnetic resonance imaging applications, as it can lead to severe artefacts that reduce image quality. The scanned individuals themselves, however, are often not aware of their head motion. The current study explored wheth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krause, Florian, Benjamins, Caroline, Eck, Judith, Lührs, Michael, van Hoof, Rick, Goebel, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24683
_version_ 1783455854947729408
author Krause, Florian
Benjamins, Caroline
Eck, Judith
Lührs, Michael
van Hoof, Rick
Goebel, Rainer
author_facet Krause, Florian
Benjamins, Caroline
Eck, Judith
Lührs, Michael
van Hoof, Rick
Goebel, Rainer
author_sort Krause, Florian
collection PubMed
description Head motion is a common problem in clinical as well as empirical (functional) magnetic resonance imaging applications, as it can lead to severe artefacts that reduce image quality. The scanned individuals themselves, however, are often not aware of their head motion. The current study explored whether providing subjects with this information using tactile feedback would reduce their head motion and consequently improve image quality. In a single session that included six runs, 24 participants performed three different cognitive tasks: (a) passive viewing, (b) mental imagery, and (c) speeded responses. These tasks occurred in two different conditions: (a) with a strip of medical tape applied from one side of the magnetic resonance head coil, via the participant's forehead, to the other side, and (b) without the medical tape being applied. Results revealed that application of medical tape to the forehead of subjects to provide tactile feedback significantly reduced both translational as well as rotational head motion. While this effect did not differ between the three cognitive tasks, there was a negative quadratic relationship between head motion with and without feedback. That is, the more head motion a subject produced without feedback, the stronger the motion reduction given the feedback. In conclusion, the here tested method provides a simple and cost‐efficient way to reduce subjects' head motion, and might be especially beneficial when extensive head motion is expected a priori.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6772179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67721792019-10-07 Active head motion reduction in magnetic resonance imaging using tactile feedback Krause, Florian Benjamins, Caroline Eck, Judith Lührs, Michael van Hoof, Rick Goebel, Rainer Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Head motion is a common problem in clinical as well as empirical (functional) magnetic resonance imaging applications, as it can lead to severe artefacts that reduce image quality. The scanned individuals themselves, however, are often not aware of their head motion. The current study explored whether providing subjects with this information using tactile feedback would reduce their head motion and consequently improve image quality. In a single session that included six runs, 24 participants performed three different cognitive tasks: (a) passive viewing, (b) mental imagery, and (c) speeded responses. These tasks occurred in two different conditions: (a) with a strip of medical tape applied from one side of the magnetic resonance head coil, via the participant's forehead, to the other side, and (b) without the medical tape being applied. Results revealed that application of medical tape to the forehead of subjects to provide tactile feedback significantly reduced both translational as well as rotational head motion. While this effect did not differ between the three cognitive tasks, there was a negative quadratic relationship between head motion with and without feedback. That is, the more head motion a subject produced without feedback, the stronger the motion reduction given the feedback. In conclusion, the here tested method provides a simple and cost‐efficient way to reduce subjects' head motion, and might be especially beneficial when extensive head motion is expected a priori. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6772179/ /pubmed/31179609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24683 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Krause, Florian
Benjamins, Caroline
Eck, Judith
Lührs, Michael
van Hoof, Rick
Goebel, Rainer
Active head motion reduction in magnetic resonance imaging using tactile feedback
title Active head motion reduction in magnetic resonance imaging using tactile feedback
title_full Active head motion reduction in magnetic resonance imaging using tactile feedback
title_fullStr Active head motion reduction in magnetic resonance imaging using tactile feedback
title_full_unstemmed Active head motion reduction in magnetic resonance imaging using tactile feedback
title_short Active head motion reduction in magnetic resonance imaging using tactile feedback
title_sort active head motion reduction in magnetic resonance imaging using tactile feedback
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6772179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31179609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24683
work_keys_str_mv AT krauseflorian activeheadmotionreductioninmagneticresonanceimagingusingtactilefeedback
AT benjaminscaroline activeheadmotionreductioninmagneticresonanceimagingusingtactilefeedback
AT eckjudith activeheadmotionreductioninmagneticresonanceimagingusingtactilefeedback
AT luhrsmichael activeheadmotionreductioninmagneticresonanceimagingusingtactilefeedback
AT vanhoofrick activeheadmotionreductioninmagneticresonanceimagingusingtactilefeedback
AT goebelrainer activeheadmotionreductioninmagneticresonanceimagingusingtactilefeedback