Cargando…
An observational study to examine how cumulative impact zones influence alcohol availability from different types of licensed outlets in an inner London Borough
OBJECTIVES: Cumulative impact zones (CIZs) are a widely implemented local policy intended to restrict alcohol availability in areas proliferated with licensed outlets. Limited previous research has questioned their effectiveness and suggested they may play a more nuanced role in shaping local alcoho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31551372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027320 |
_version_ | 1783455896126357504 |
---|---|
author | Sharpe, Carolyn A Poots, Alan Watt, Hilary Williamson, Chris Franklin, David Pinder, Richard J |
author_facet | Sharpe, Carolyn A Poots, Alan Watt, Hilary Williamson, Chris Franklin, David Pinder, Richard J |
author_sort | Sharpe, Carolyn A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Cumulative impact zones (CIZs) are a widely implemented local policy intended to restrict alcohol availability in areas proliferated with licensed outlets. Limited previous research has questioned their effectiveness and suggested they may play a more nuanced role in shaping local alcohol environments. This study evaluates the association between CIZ implementation and the number of licence applications made, and the number issued, relative to a control region. DESIGN: A quantitative observational study. SETTING: The inner London Borough of Southwark, which currently enforces three CIZs. POPULATION: Licence applications received by Southwark Council’s Licensing Authority between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2017 (n=1254). INTERVENTIONS: CIZ implementation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Five outlet types were categorised and evaluated: drinking establishments, eateries, takeaways, off sales and other outlets. Primary outcome measures were the number of applications received and the number of licences issued. These were analysed using Poisson regression of counts over time. RESULTS: Across all CIZs, implementation was associated with greater increases in the number of eateries in CIZ regions (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=1.58, 95% CI: 1.02–2.45, p=0.04) and number of takeaway venues (IRR=3.89, 95% CI: 1.32–11.49, p=0.01), relative to the control area. No discernible association was found for the remaining outlet types. Disaggregating by area indicated a 10-fold relative increase in the number of new eateries in Peckham CIZ (IRR=10.38, 95% CI: 1.39–77.66, p=0.02) and a fourfold relative increase in the number of newly licensed takeaways in Bankside CIZ (IRR=4.38, 95% CI: 1.20–15.91, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CIZs may be useful as policy levers to shape local alcohol environments to support the licensing goals of specific geographical areas and diversify the night-time economy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6773415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67734152019-10-21 An observational study to examine how cumulative impact zones influence alcohol availability from different types of licensed outlets in an inner London Borough Sharpe, Carolyn A Poots, Alan Watt, Hilary Williamson, Chris Franklin, David Pinder, Richard J BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Cumulative impact zones (CIZs) are a widely implemented local policy intended to restrict alcohol availability in areas proliferated with licensed outlets. Limited previous research has questioned their effectiveness and suggested they may play a more nuanced role in shaping local alcohol environments. This study evaluates the association between CIZ implementation and the number of licence applications made, and the number issued, relative to a control region. DESIGN: A quantitative observational study. SETTING: The inner London Borough of Southwark, which currently enforces three CIZs. POPULATION: Licence applications received by Southwark Council’s Licensing Authority between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2017 (n=1254). INTERVENTIONS: CIZ implementation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Five outlet types were categorised and evaluated: drinking establishments, eateries, takeaways, off sales and other outlets. Primary outcome measures were the number of applications received and the number of licences issued. These were analysed using Poisson regression of counts over time. RESULTS: Across all CIZs, implementation was associated with greater increases in the number of eateries in CIZ regions (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=1.58, 95% CI: 1.02–2.45, p=0.04) and number of takeaway venues (IRR=3.89, 95% CI: 1.32–11.49, p=0.01), relative to the control area. No discernible association was found for the remaining outlet types. Disaggregating by area indicated a 10-fold relative increase in the number of new eateries in Peckham CIZ (IRR=10.38, 95% CI: 1.39–77.66, p=0.02) and a fourfold relative increase in the number of newly licensed takeaways in Bankside CIZ (IRR=4.38, 95% CI: 1.20–15.91, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CIZs may be useful as policy levers to shape local alcohol environments to support the licensing goals of specific geographical areas and diversify the night-time economy. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6773415/ /pubmed/31551372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027320 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Sharpe, Carolyn A Poots, Alan Watt, Hilary Williamson, Chris Franklin, David Pinder, Richard J An observational study to examine how cumulative impact zones influence alcohol availability from different types of licensed outlets in an inner London Borough |
title | An observational study to examine how cumulative impact zones influence alcohol availability from different types of licensed outlets in an inner London Borough |
title_full | An observational study to examine how cumulative impact zones influence alcohol availability from different types of licensed outlets in an inner London Borough |
title_fullStr | An observational study to examine how cumulative impact zones influence alcohol availability from different types of licensed outlets in an inner London Borough |
title_full_unstemmed | An observational study to examine how cumulative impact zones influence alcohol availability from different types of licensed outlets in an inner London Borough |
title_short | An observational study to examine how cumulative impact zones influence alcohol availability from different types of licensed outlets in an inner London Borough |
title_sort | observational study to examine how cumulative impact zones influence alcohol availability from different types of licensed outlets in an inner london borough |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31551372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharpecarolyna anobservationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT pootsalan anobservationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT watthilary anobservationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT williamsonchris anobservationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT franklindavid anobservationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT pinderrichardj anobservationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT sharpecarolyna observationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT pootsalan observationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT watthilary observationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT williamsonchris observationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT franklindavid observationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough AT pinderrichardj observationalstudytoexaminehowcumulativeimpactzonesinfluencealcoholavailabilityfromdifferenttypesoflicensedoutletsinaninnerlondonborough |