Cargando…

A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy

Transvenous temporary cardiac pacing therapy (TV-TP) is widely used to treat life-threatening arrhythmias. Yet aggregated evidence on TV-TP is limited. We conducted a systematic scoping review to evaluate indications, access routes and complications of TV-TP, as well as permanent pacemaker therapy (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tjong, F. V. Y., de Ruijter, U. W., Beurskens, N. E. G., Knops, R. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01307-x
_version_ 1783455955636191232
author Tjong, F. V. Y.
de Ruijter, U. W.
Beurskens, N. E. G.
Knops, R. E.
author_facet Tjong, F. V. Y.
de Ruijter, U. W.
Beurskens, N. E. G.
Knops, R. E.
author_sort Tjong, F. V. Y.
collection PubMed
description Transvenous temporary cardiac pacing therapy (TV-TP) is widely used to treat life-threatening arrhythmias. Yet aggregated evidence on TV-TP is limited. We conducted a systematic scoping review to evaluate indications, access routes and complications of TV-TP, as well as permanent pacemaker therapy (PPM) following TV-TP. Clinical studies concerning TV-TP were identified in Ovid MEDLINE. Case studies and studies lacking complication rates were excluded. To assess complication incidence over time, differences in mean complication rates between 10-year intervals since the introduction of TV-TP were evaluated. We identified 1398 studies, of which 32 were included, effectively including 4546 patients. Indications varied considerably; however TV-TP was most commonly performed in atrioventricular block (62.7%). The preferred site of access was the femoral vein (47.2%). The mean complication rate was 36.7%, of which 10.2% were considered serious. The incidence of complications decreased significantly between 10-year interval groups, but remained high in the most recent time period (22.9%) (analysis of variance; p < 0.001). PPM was required in 64.2% of cases following TV-TP. Atrioventricular block was the primary indication for TV-TP; however indications varied widely. The femoral vein was the most frequent approach. Complications are common in patients undergoing TV-TP. Although a decrease has been observed since its introduction, the clinical burden remains significant. The majority of patients who underwent TV-TP required PPM therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-01307-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6773795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67737952019-10-17 A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy Tjong, F. V. Y. de Ruijter, U. W. Beurskens, N. E. G. Knops, R. E. Neth Heart J Review Article Transvenous temporary cardiac pacing therapy (TV-TP) is widely used to treat life-threatening arrhythmias. Yet aggregated evidence on TV-TP is limited. We conducted a systematic scoping review to evaluate indications, access routes and complications of TV-TP, as well as permanent pacemaker therapy (PPM) following TV-TP. Clinical studies concerning TV-TP were identified in Ovid MEDLINE. Case studies and studies lacking complication rates were excluded. To assess complication incidence over time, differences in mean complication rates between 10-year intervals since the introduction of TV-TP were evaluated. We identified 1398 studies, of which 32 were included, effectively including 4546 patients. Indications varied considerably; however TV-TP was most commonly performed in atrioventricular block (62.7%). The preferred site of access was the femoral vein (47.2%). The mean complication rate was 36.7%, of which 10.2% were considered serious. The incidence of complications decreased significantly between 10-year interval groups, but remained high in the most recent time period (22.9%) (analysis of variance; p < 0.001). PPM was required in 64.2% of cases following TV-TP. Atrioventricular block was the primary indication for TV-TP; however indications varied widely. The femoral vein was the most frequent approach. Complications are common in patients undergoing TV-TP. Although a decrease has been observed since its introduction, the clinical burden remains significant. The majority of patients who underwent TV-TP required PPM therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-01307-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019-08-07 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6773795/ /pubmed/31392624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01307-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Tjong, F. V. Y.
de Ruijter, U. W.
Beurskens, N. E. G.
Knops, R. E.
A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy
title A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy
title_full A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy
title_fullStr A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy
title_short A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy
title_sort comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01307-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tjongfvy acomprehensivescopingreviewontransvenoustemporarypacingtherapy
AT deruijteruw acomprehensivescopingreviewontransvenoustemporarypacingtherapy
AT beurskensneg acomprehensivescopingreviewontransvenoustemporarypacingtherapy
AT knopsre acomprehensivescopingreviewontransvenoustemporarypacingtherapy
AT tjongfvy comprehensivescopingreviewontransvenoustemporarypacingtherapy
AT deruijteruw comprehensivescopingreviewontransvenoustemporarypacingtherapy
AT beurskensneg comprehensivescopingreviewontransvenoustemporarypacingtherapy
AT knopsre comprehensivescopingreviewontransvenoustemporarypacingtherapy