Cargando…

Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study

BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) has become a popular tool in primary care. The clinical value of the ECG depends on the appropriateness of the indication and the interpretation skills of the general practitioner (GP). OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of electrocardiography in primary care and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagenvoort, L. M. E., Willemsen, R. T. A., Konings, K. T. S., Stoffers, H. E. J. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y
_version_ 1783455956351320064
author Wagenvoort, L. M. E.
Willemsen, R. T. A.
Konings, K. T. S.
Stoffers, H. E. J. H.
author_facet Wagenvoort, L. M. E.
Willemsen, R. T. A.
Konings, K. T. S.
Stoffers, H. E. J. H.
author_sort Wagenvoort, L. M. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) has become a popular tool in primary care. The clinical value of the ECG depends on the appropriateness of the indication and the interpretation skills of the general practitioner (GP). OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of electrocardiography in primary care and to assess the performance of GPs in interpreting ECGs and making subsequent management decisions. METHODS: Three hundred ECGs, recorded during daily practice in symptomatic patients by 14 GPs who regularly perform electrocardiography, were selected. Corresponding data of the indications, interpretations and subsequent management actions were extracted from the associated medical records. A panel consisting of an expert GP and a cardiologist reviewed the ECGs and specified their agreement with the findings and actions of the study GPs. RESULTS: The most common indications were suspicion of a rhythm abnormality (43.7%), ischaemic heart disease (42.7%) and patient reassurance (14.3%). The study GPs interpreted 53.3% of the ECGs as showing no (new or acute) abnormality, whereas supraventricular rhythm disorders (12.3%), conduction disorders (7.7%) and repolarisation disorders (7.0%) were the most frequently reported pathological findings. Overall, the expert panel disagreed with the interpretations of the study GPs in 16.2% of cases, and with the GPs’ management actions in 11.7%. Learning goals for GPs performing electrocardiography could be formulated for acute coronary syndrome, rhythm disorders, pulmonary embolism, reassurance, left ventricular hypertrophy and premature ventricular complexes. CONCLUSION: GPs who feel competent in electrocardiography performed well in the opinion of the expert panel. We formulated various learning objectives for GPs performing electrocardiography. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6773798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67737982019-10-17 Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study Wagenvoort, L. M. E. Willemsen, R. T. A. Konings, K. T. S. Stoffers, H. E. J. H. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) has become a popular tool in primary care. The clinical value of the ECG depends on the appropriateness of the indication and the interpretation skills of the general practitioner (GP). OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of electrocardiography in primary care and to assess the performance of GPs in interpreting ECGs and making subsequent management decisions. METHODS: Three hundred ECGs, recorded during daily practice in symptomatic patients by 14 GPs who regularly perform electrocardiography, were selected. Corresponding data of the indications, interpretations and subsequent management actions were extracted from the associated medical records. A panel consisting of an expert GP and a cardiologist reviewed the ECGs and specified their agreement with the findings and actions of the study GPs. RESULTS: The most common indications were suspicion of a rhythm abnormality (43.7%), ischaemic heart disease (42.7%) and patient reassurance (14.3%). The study GPs interpreted 53.3% of the ECGs as showing no (new or acute) abnormality, whereas supraventricular rhythm disorders (12.3%), conduction disorders (7.7%) and repolarisation disorders (7.0%) were the most frequently reported pathological findings. Overall, the expert panel disagreed with the interpretations of the study GPs in 16.2% of cases, and with the GPs’ management actions in 11.7%. Learning goals for GPs performing electrocardiography could be formulated for acute coronary syndrome, rhythm disorders, pulmonary embolism, reassurance, left ventricular hypertrophy and premature ventricular complexes. CONCLUSION: GPs who feel competent in electrocardiography performed well in the opinion of the expert panel. We formulated various learning objectives for GPs performing electrocardiography. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019-07-12 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6773798/ /pubmed/31301001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wagenvoort, L. M. E.
Willemsen, R. T. A.
Konings, K. T. S.
Stoffers, H. E. J. H.
Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study
title Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study
title_full Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study
title_fullStr Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study
title_full_unstemmed Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study
title_short Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study
title_sort interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wagenvoortlme interpretationsofandmanagementactionsfollowingelectrocardiogramsinsymptomaticpatientsinprimarycarearetrospectivedossierstudy
AT willemsenrta interpretationsofandmanagementactionsfollowingelectrocardiogramsinsymptomaticpatientsinprimarycarearetrospectivedossierstudy
AT koningskts interpretationsofandmanagementactionsfollowingelectrocardiogramsinsymptomaticpatientsinprimarycarearetrospectivedossierstudy
AT stoffershejh interpretationsofandmanagementactionsfollowingelectrocardiogramsinsymptomaticpatientsinprimarycarearetrospectivedossierstudy