Cargando…
Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study
BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) has become a popular tool in primary care. The clinical value of the ECG depends on the appropriateness of the indication and the interpretation skills of the general practitioner (GP). OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of electrocardiography in primary care and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y |
_version_ | 1783455956351320064 |
---|---|
author | Wagenvoort, L. M. E. Willemsen, R. T. A. Konings, K. T. S. Stoffers, H. E. J. H. |
author_facet | Wagenvoort, L. M. E. Willemsen, R. T. A. Konings, K. T. S. Stoffers, H. E. J. H. |
author_sort | Wagenvoort, L. M. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) has become a popular tool in primary care. The clinical value of the ECG depends on the appropriateness of the indication and the interpretation skills of the general practitioner (GP). OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of electrocardiography in primary care and to assess the performance of GPs in interpreting ECGs and making subsequent management decisions. METHODS: Three hundred ECGs, recorded during daily practice in symptomatic patients by 14 GPs who regularly perform electrocardiography, were selected. Corresponding data of the indications, interpretations and subsequent management actions were extracted from the associated medical records. A panel consisting of an expert GP and a cardiologist reviewed the ECGs and specified their agreement with the findings and actions of the study GPs. RESULTS: The most common indications were suspicion of a rhythm abnormality (43.7%), ischaemic heart disease (42.7%) and patient reassurance (14.3%). The study GPs interpreted 53.3% of the ECGs as showing no (new or acute) abnormality, whereas supraventricular rhythm disorders (12.3%), conduction disorders (7.7%) and repolarisation disorders (7.0%) were the most frequently reported pathological findings. Overall, the expert panel disagreed with the interpretations of the study GPs in 16.2% of cases, and with the GPs’ management actions in 11.7%. Learning goals for GPs performing electrocardiography could be formulated for acute coronary syndrome, rhythm disorders, pulmonary embolism, reassurance, left ventricular hypertrophy and premature ventricular complexes. CONCLUSION: GPs who feel competent in electrocardiography performed well in the opinion of the expert panel. We formulated various learning objectives for GPs performing electrocardiography. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6773798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67737982019-10-17 Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study Wagenvoort, L. M. E. Willemsen, R. T. A. Konings, K. T. S. Stoffers, H. E. J. H. Neth Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: The electrocardiogram (ECG) has become a popular tool in primary care. The clinical value of the ECG depends on the appropriateness of the indication and the interpretation skills of the general practitioner (GP). OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of electrocardiography in primary care and to assess the performance of GPs in interpreting ECGs and making subsequent management decisions. METHODS: Three hundred ECGs, recorded during daily practice in symptomatic patients by 14 GPs who regularly perform electrocardiography, were selected. Corresponding data of the indications, interpretations and subsequent management actions were extracted from the associated medical records. A panel consisting of an expert GP and a cardiologist reviewed the ECGs and specified their agreement with the findings and actions of the study GPs. RESULTS: The most common indications were suspicion of a rhythm abnormality (43.7%), ischaemic heart disease (42.7%) and patient reassurance (14.3%). The study GPs interpreted 53.3% of the ECGs as showing no (new or acute) abnormality, whereas supraventricular rhythm disorders (12.3%), conduction disorders (7.7%) and repolarisation disorders (7.0%) were the most frequently reported pathological findings. Overall, the expert panel disagreed with the interpretations of the study GPs in 16.2% of cases, and with the GPs’ management actions in 11.7%. Learning goals for GPs performing electrocardiography could be formulated for acute coronary syndrome, rhythm disorders, pulmonary embolism, reassurance, left ventricular hypertrophy and premature ventricular complexes. CONCLUSION: GPs who feel competent in electrocardiography performed well in the opinion of the expert panel. We formulated various learning objectives for GPs performing electrocardiography. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2019-07-12 2019-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6773798/ /pubmed/31301001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wagenvoort, L. M. E. Willemsen, R. T. A. Konings, K. T. S. Stoffers, H. E. J. H. Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study |
title | Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study |
title_full | Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study |
title_fullStr | Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study |
title_short | Interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study |
title_sort | interpretations of and management actions following electrocardiograms in symptomatic patients in primary care: a retrospective dossier study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31301001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01306-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagenvoortlme interpretationsofandmanagementactionsfollowingelectrocardiogramsinsymptomaticpatientsinprimarycarearetrospectivedossierstudy AT willemsenrta interpretationsofandmanagementactionsfollowingelectrocardiogramsinsymptomaticpatientsinprimarycarearetrospectivedossierstudy AT koningskts interpretationsofandmanagementactionsfollowingelectrocardiogramsinsymptomaticpatientsinprimarycarearetrospectivedossierstudy AT stoffershejh interpretationsofandmanagementactionsfollowingelectrocardiogramsinsymptomaticpatientsinprimarycarearetrospectivedossierstudy |