Cargando…

Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?

Purpose: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children younger than 1 year of age is still debatable due to its supposed technical difficulties and failure rate. We present our experience and outcome in infants. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 3 Departments of Pediatric Surgery....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zamfir Snykers, Corina, De Plaen, Elea, Vermersch, Sophie, Lopez, Manuel, Khelif, Karim, Luyckx, Stephane, Philippe, Paul, Varlet, Francois, Steyaert, Henri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00352
_version_ 1783455958915088384
author Zamfir Snykers, Corina
De Plaen, Elea
Vermersch, Sophie
Lopez, Manuel
Khelif, Karim
Luyckx, Stephane
Philippe, Paul
Varlet, Francois
Steyaert, Henri
author_facet Zamfir Snykers, Corina
De Plaen, Elea
Vermersch, Sophie
Lopez, Manuel
Khelif, Karim
Luyckx, Stephane
Philippe, Paul
Varlet, Francois
Steyaert, Henri
author_sort Zamfir Snykers, Corina
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children younger than 1 year of age is still debatable due to its supposed technical difficulties and failure rate. We present our experience and outcome in infants. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 3 Departments of Pediatric Surgery. We reviewed the records of the children under 1 year of age operated on for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), between 2007 and 2017. Anderson-Hynes laparoscopic transabdominal dismembered pyeloplasty was performed. Patients' demographics, results of preoperative and postoperative exams, perioperative details, complications, hospital stay, and long-term follow-up results were analyzed. Results: Sixty cases were operated on during this period (49 boys, 11 girls). Mean age at operation was 4.5 months (1–12 months). Mean operating time was 140 min (80–240 min). There was no conversion in this group. There were four early complications: 1 ileus, 1 hypertension immediately post-operatively requiring medical treatment, 1 omental herniation through a drain orifice, and 1 percutaneous transanastomotic stent migrated intra-abdominally. The two last children had to be reoperated. Mean hospital stay was of 2 days (1–10 days). Late complications: two patients (3.4%) presented a recurrence of UPJO, one had been re-operated 15 months later and for the patient with persistent hypertension, nephropexy was performed for malrotated kidney, 1 year after pyeloplasty. Long term follow-up with a mean of 2.8 years (1–10 years) showed that surgery improved mean pelvic dilatation from 31.8 mm (13–63 mm) preoperatively to 15.3 mm (4–40 mm) postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The renal function slightly improved, from a mean of 35.7% (5–55%) it passed to 40.5% (0–54%), p = 0.137. In three cases the operated kidney became finally non-functional and atrophic. Conclusions: Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty is feasible and safe in children younger than 1 year of age. Nevertheless, it requires experience and good intra-abdominal suturing skills. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has a success rate comparable with open treatment but with less morbidity and better cosmetic results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6773808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67738082019-10-13 Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option? Zamfir Snykers, Corina De Plaen, Elea Vermersch, Sophie Lopez, Manuel Khelif, Karim Luyckx, Stephane Philippe, Paul Varlet, Francois Steyaert, Henri Front Pediatr Pediatrics Purpose: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children younger than 1 year of age is still debatable due to its supposed technical difficulties and failure rate. We present our experience and outcome in infants. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 3 Departments of Pediatric Surgery. We reviewed the records of the children under 1 year of age operated on for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), between 2007 and 2017. Anderson-Hynes laparoscopic transabdominal dismembered pyeloplasty was performed. Patients' demographics, results of preoperative and postoperative exams, perioperative details, complications, hospital stay, and long-term follow-up results were analyzed. Results: Sixty cases were operated on during this period (49 boys, 11 girls). Mean age at operation was 4.5 months (1–12 months). Mean operating time was 140 min (80–240 min). There was no conversion in this group. There were four early complications: 1 ileus, 1 hypertension immediately post-operatively requiring medical treatment, 1 omental herniation through a drain orifice, and 1 percutaneous transanastomotic stent migrated intra-abdominally. The two last children had to be reoperated. Mean hospital stay was of 2 days (1–10 days). Late complications: two patients (3.4%) presented a recurrence of UPJO, one had been re-operated 15 months later and for the patient with persistent hypertension, nephropexy was performed for malrotated kidney, 1 year after pyeloplasty. Long term follow-up with a mean of 2.8 years (1–10 years) showed that surgery improved mean pelvic dilatation from 31.8 mm (13–63 mm) preoperatively to 15.3 mm (4–40 mm) postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The renal function slightly improved, from a mean of 35.7% (5–55%) it passed to 40.5% (0–54%), p = 0.137. In three cases the operated kidney became finally non-functional and atrophic. Conclusions: Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty is feasible and safe in children younger than 1 year of age. Nevertheless, it requires experience and good intra-abdominal suturing skills. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has a success rate comparable with open treatment but with less morbidity and better cosmetic results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6773808/ /pubmed/31608264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00352 Text en Copyright © 2019 Zamfir Snykers, De Plaen, Vermersch, Lopez, Khelif, Luyckx, Philippe, Varlet and Steyaert. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Zamfir Snykers, Corina
De Plaen, Elea
Vermersch, Sophie
Lopez, Manuel
Khelif, Karim
Luyckx, Stephane
Philippe, Paul
Varlet, Francois
Steyaert, Henri
Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?
title Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?
title_full Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?
title_fullStr Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?
title_full_unstemmed Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?
title_short Is Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Infants Under 1 Year of Age a Good Option?
title_sort is laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants under 1 year of age a good option?
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6773808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31608264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00352
work_keys_str_mv AT zamfirsnykerscorina islaparoscopicpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstructionininfantsunder1yearofageagoodoption
AT deplaenelea islaparoscopicpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstructionininfantsunder1yearofageagoodoption
AT vermerschsophie islaparoscopicpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstructionininfantsunder1yearofageagoodoption
AT lopezmanuel islaparoscopicpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstructionininfantsunder1yearofageagoodoption
AT khelifkarim islaparoscopicpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstructionininfantsunder1yearofageagoodoption
AT luyckxstephane islaparoscopicpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstructionininfantsunder1yearofageagoodoption
AT philippepaul islaparoscopicpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstructionininfantsunder1yearofageagoodoption
AT varletfrancois islaparoscopicpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstructionininfantsunder1yearofageagoodoption
AT steyaerthenri islaparoscopicpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstructionininfantsunder1yearofageagoodoption